Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:38:28.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetization Measurements of 5µm Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 Crystals: Approach to Intrinsic Behavior with Decreasing Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

G. S. Grader
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
A.F. Hebard
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
L. F. Schneemeyer
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

Magnetization measurements on cubic Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 crystals, approximately 5µm in radius, have been obtained using a recently-developed electrodynamic force balance technique. The onset of flux entry in an external filed H is marked by a pronounced deviation from a linear magnetization at a critical field H* c1 together with a noticeable reorientation of the crystal near H = 0, a reorientation caused by a field-induced torque on the remanent moment. The dependence of H* c1 on temperature is linear over the temperature range 7K≤T≤30K with a slope approximately a factor of three higher than published values. These higher values of H* c1 imply either intrinsically cleaner material with a reduced Ginzburg-Landau parameter K or higher surface critical fields. These results suggest that the intrinsic properties of high-Tc superconductors may be more accurately reflected in small crystals which are more likely to be of higher quality than larger crystals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Batlogg, B., Cava, R. J., Rupp, L. W. Jr., Musjsce, A. M., Krajewski, J. J., Remeika, J. P., Peck, W. F. Jr., Cooper, A. S., and Espinosa, G. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1670(1988).Google Scholar
2 Grader, G. S., Hebard, A. F. and Eick, R. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 2238(1988).Google Scholar
3 Schneemeyer, L. F., Thomas, J. K., Siegrist, T., Batlogg, B., Rupp, L. W., Opila, R. L., Cava, R. J., and Murphy, D. W., Nature 335, 421(1988).Google Scholar
4 Sageev (Grader), G., Sienfeld, J. H., and Flagan, R. C., Rev. Sei. Instrum. 57, 933(1986).Google Scholar
5 Bean, C. P. and Livingston, J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 14(1964).Google Scholar