Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T09:23:29.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laser-Assisted Deposition of Fe and W: Photodecomposition of Fe(CO)5, and W(CO)6 on Si(111)-(7×7)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jon R. Swanson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Dept. of Chemistry, 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138
C.M. Friend
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Dept. of Chemistry, 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138
Y.J. Chabal
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Labs, 600 Mountain Ave., Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

The laser-assisted chemical vapor deposition (LCVD) of Fe and W on Si(lll)-(7×7) was investigated under ultrahigh vacuum conditions at 120 K. Multiple internal reflection Fourier transform infrared and Auger electron spectroscopies and temperature programmed desorption and low energy electron diffraction were used to study the adsorption and decomposition of Fe(C0)5 and w(C0)6 on the surface. Neither of the molecules thermally reacts in temperature programmed desorption experiments. Reversible molecular desorption is exclusively observed. Decomposition of both molecules via electronic excitation was induced by ultraviolet, but not visible photons. This was shown by measuring the photodecomposition yield as a function of wavelength. Visible photolysis (λ=720 nm) had no observable effect on either molecule. No surface stable, partially decarbonylated, Fe(C0), x<5, fragments observable with infrared spectroscopy were produced by photolysis. Also, no new features were observed in temperature programmed desorption experiments and only iron was detected on the surface after photolysis. In contrast, initial results indicate that photolysis of W(C0)fi does produce surface stable, W(C0), x<6, fragments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Part of this work was supported by the NSF (#CHE-83-09455) and (#CHE-84-51307) and the Harvard University Materials Research Lab (NSF DMR-83-169790).

References

REFERENCES

1 Ehrlich, D.J., Osgood, R.M. jr. and Deutsch, T.F., IEEE J. Quantum Elec. JL6, 1233 (1980).Google Scholar
2 Yardley, J.T., Gitlin, B., Nathanson, G. and Rosan, A.M., J. Chem. Phys. 74, 361 (1981).Google Scholar
3 Yardley, J.T., Gitlin, B., Nathanson, G. and Rosan, A.M., J. Chem. Phys. 74, 370 (1981).Google Scholar
4 Beach, N.A. and Gray, H.B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 5713 (1968).Google Scholar
5 Horak, D.V. and Winn, J.S., J. Chem. Phys. 87, 265 (1983).Google Scholar
6 Lewis, K.E., Golden, D.M. and Smith, G.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 3905 (1984).Google Scholar
7 Connor, J.A., Topics in Curr. Chem. 71, 71 (1977).Google Scholar
8 Celii, F.G., Whitmore, P.M. and Janda, K.C., Chem. Phys. Lett. 138, 257 (1987).Google Scholar
9 Bartosch, C.E., Gluck, N.S., Ho, W. and Ying, Z., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1425 (1986).Google Scholar
10 Poliakoff, M., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1974, 210.Google Scholar
11 Graham, M.A., Poliakoff, M. and Turner, J.J., J. Chem. Soc. A 1971, 2939.Google Scholar
12 Ouderkirk, A.J. and Weitz, E., J. Chem. Phys. 79, 1089 (1983).Google Scholar
13 Swanson, J.R., Friend, C.M. and Chabal, Y.J., J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5028 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Cataliotti, R., Foffani, A. and Marchetti, L., Inorg. Chem. 10, 1595 (1971).Google Scholar
15 Chabal, Y.J., Hiqashi, G.S. and Christman, S.B., Phys. Rev. B 28, 4472 (1983).Google Scholar
16 Adams, D.M. and Taylor, I.D., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 78, 1051 (1982).Google Scholar
17 Amer. Inst, of Phys. Handbook, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972) Sec.6g.Google Scholar
18 The mass spectrometer did not have line of sight detection during photolysis.Google Scholar