Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:48:26.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interphase Integrity of Neutron Irradiated SIC Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. L. Snead
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. 0. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37830-6087, SneadLL@oml.gov
E. Lara-Curzio
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. 0. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37830-6087
Get access

Abstract

SiC/SiC composites were fabricated from Hi-Nicalon™ fibers with carbon, porous SiC and multilayer SiC interphases. These materials were then irradiated in the High Flux Beam Reactor with fast neutrons at 260 and 900–1060°C to a dose of l.1×1025 n/m2 corresponding to 1.1 displacements per atom (dpa). Results are presented for bend strength of both non-irradiated and irradiated materials. Within the interphases studied the multilayer SiC interphase material showed the least degradation (8-20%) in ultimate bend stress, while porous SiC underwent the greatest degradation (∼35%). The fiber matrix interphases are studied with TEM for both non- irradiated and irradiated materials. While no irradiation induced microstructural evolution of the interphase was observed, debonding of the interphase from the fiber was observed for all cases. This debonding is attributed to tensile stresses developed at the interface due to densification of the Hi-Nicalon™ fiber. Residual stress analysis of the fiber matrix interface indicates that the irradiation-induced densification of Hi-Nicalon™ and the volumetric expansion of the CVD SiC matrix cause tensile stresses well in excess of those which can be withstood by these, or any other viable SiC composite interphase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Price, R. J., Nucl. Tech., 35 (1970) 320.Google Scholar
2. Price, R. J., J. Nucl. Mater 33 (1969) pp. 1722.Google Scholar
3. Dienst, W., Fusion Eng. Design, 16 (1991) pp. 311316.Google Scholar
4. Hollenberg, G. W. et al. J. Nucl. Mater. 219 (1995) pp. 7086.Google Scholar
5. Price, R. J. and Hopkins, G. R. J. Nucl. Mater. 108–109 (1982) pp. 732.Google Scholar
6. Okamura, K. et al. J. Nucl. Mat., 155–157 (1988) pp. 329333.Google Scholar
7. Kohyama, A., Tezuka, H. and Saito, S., J. Nucl. Mater. 155–157 (1988) pp. 334339.Google Scholar
8. Kohyama, A., Sata, S. and Hamada, K., 15th ASTM International Symposium on Effects of Radiation on Materials. Stoller, R. E. et al. , eds. ASTM 1125 (1990) pp. 785796.Google Scholar
9. Kohyama, A., Tezuka, H. and Saito, S., in Interfaces in Polymer, Ceramic, and Metal Matrix Composites. ed. Ishida, Hatsuo. (Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. 1988).Google Scholar
10. Okamura, K., Matsuzawa, T., Sato, M., Higashiguchi, Y. and Morozumi, S., J. Nucl. Mater. 133–134 (1985) pp. 705.Google Scholar
11. Snead, L. L., M. C. Osborne and More, K. L., J. Mater. Res. Vol.10 [3](1995).pp. 736747.Google Scholar
12. Snead, L. L., Zinkle, S.J., Steiner, D.. J. Nucl. Mater. 191–194 (1992) pp. 560565.Google Scholar
13. Seguchi, T., N. Kasai and Okamura, K., Proceedings of International Conference on Evolution in Beam Applications, 1991. L. L. Snead, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 253 (1997) pp. 20.Google Scholar
14. Lowden, R. A. and More, K. L., in Interfaces in Composites, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, [170], C. G. Pantano and E. J. H. Chen, eds., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh (1990) pp. 273.Google Scholar
16. Besmann, T.M. et al. , J. de Physique 50 (1988) pp. 273.Google Scholar
17. Lara-Curzio, E and Snead, L. L.. To be submitted. J. Nuclear Materials.Google Scholar