No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Influence Of Donor, Acceptor, And Isovalent Impurity Doping On Arsenic Excess And Point Defects In Low Temperature Grown GaAs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2011
Abstract
We show that in contrast to Si donor and Be acceptor doping, isovalent In impurity doping enhances arsenic excess in the GaAs films grown by molecular beam epitaxy at low temperature. This effect is due to an increase in the concentration of arsenic antisite defects. Gallium vacancy related defects are detected only in the samples annealed at high temperature. Their concentration is found to be higher in the indium-free material than in the indium doped one
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997
References
1.
Smith, F. W., Calawa, A. R., Chen, C. L., Mantra, M. J., and Mahoney, L. J., Electron Dev.Lett.
9, 77 (1988).Google Scholar
2.
Kaminska, M., Liliental-Weber, Z., Weber, E. R., George, T., Kortright, J. B., W.Smith, F., Tsaur, B.Y., and Calawa, A. R., Appl.Phys.Lett.
54, 1831 (1989).Google Scholar
3.
Melloch, M. R., Mahalingam, K., Otsuka, N., Woodall, J. M., and Warren, A.C., J.Cryst.Growth
111, 39(1991).Google Scholar
4.
Bert, N. A., Veinger, A. I., Vilisova, M. D., Goloshchapov, S. I., Ivonin, I. V., Kozyrev, S. V., Kunitsyn, A. E., Lavrentieva, L. G., Lubyshev, D. I., Preobrazhenskii, V. V., Semyagin, B. R., Tretyakov, V. V., Chaldyshev, V. V., and Yakubenya, M. P., Phys.Solid State
35, 1289 (1993).Google Scholar
5.
Bert, N. A., Chaldyshev, V. V., Goloshchapov, S. I., Kozyrev, S. V., Kunitsyn, A. E., Tretyakov, V. V., Veinger, A. I., Ivonin, I. V., Lavrentieva, L. G., Vilisova, M. D., Yakubenya, M. P., Lubyshev, D. I., Preobrazhenskii, V. V., and Semyagin, B. R., in: Physics and Applications of Defects in Advanced Semiconductors (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.
325, 1994), pp.401–406.Google Scholar
6.
Liliental-Weber, Z., Swider, W., Yu, K. M., Kortright, J., Smith, F. W., and Calawa., A. R.
Appl.Phys.Lett.
58, 2153 (1991).Google Scholar
7.
Pritchard, R. E., McQuaid, S. A., Hart, L., Newman, R. C., Makinen, J., Bardeleben, H. J. von, and Missous, M.. J. Appl. Phys., 78, 2411 (1995)Google Scholar
8.
Liu, X., Prasad, A., Nishio, J., Weber, E. R., Liliental-Weber, Z., and Walukiewicz, W.. Appl. Phys. Lett.
67, 279 (1995).Google Scholar
9.
Gutkin, A. A., Averkiev, N. S., Reshchikov, M. A., and Sedov, V. E.. Mat. Sci. Forum
196–201, 231, (1995).Google Scholar
10.
Biryulin, Yu. F., Ganina, N. V., Milvidskii, M. G., Shmartsev, Yu.V. and Chaldyshev, V. V.. Soy. Phys. Semicond., 17, 108 (1983)Google Scholar
11.
Chaldyshev, V. V., Astrova, E. V., Lebedev, A. A., Bobrovnikova, I. A., Chernov, N. A., Ivleva, O. M., Lavrentieva, L.G., Teterkina, I. V., and Vilisova, M. D. J. Cryst. Growth, 146, 246 (1995)Google Scholar