Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:32:03.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Critical Resolved Shear Stresses for Various Plastic Deformation Mechanisms To Understand Mechanical Properties of Magnesium-Yttrium Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2015

T. Mineta
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628
S. Miura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628
Get access

Abstract

In order to understand enhanced mechanical properties of magnesium-yttrium (Mg-Y) alloys, applied stresses which were required to operate independent plastic deformation mechanisms on various stress axes were evaluated. Moreover, for this analysis, mechanical tests including newly-established testing method “pure-shear test” were conducted to evaluate Critical Resolved Shear Stresses (CRSSes) for various plastic deformation mechanisms of Mg-Y solid solution alloy single crystals with various Y concentration. Relatively higher solid solution strengthening of dominant plastic deformation mechanisms such as basal slip and extension twin at room temperature, results in increase in the activation of non-basal slip system. By a simple analysis based on von-Mises criterion with experimental CRSS values, it is revealed that enhanced mechanical properties of Mg-Y alloys might be attributed to the decrease of difference in the activity of plastic deformation mechanisms by Y addition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yoshinaga, H. and Horiuchi, R., Trans. JIM, 4,1 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obara, T., Yoshinaga, H. and Morozumi, S., ActaMetallurgica, 21, 845 (1973).Google Scholar
Yoshinaga, H. and Horiuchi, R., Trans. JIM, 4, 134 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshinaga, H., Obara, T. and Morozumi, S., Mater. Sci. Eng.,12, 255(1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, S., Nakamura, K., Takashima, K. and Tonda, H., Keikinzoku, 42, 765 (1992).Google Scholar
Uesugi, T., Kohyama, M., Kohzu, M., Higashi, K., JSME annual meeting,2002-6, 217 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R. L. and Cahn, R. W., Proc. Roy. Soc. A239, 494 (1957).Google Scholar
Chino, Y., Kado, M. and Mabuchi, M., Materials Science and Engineering A,494, 343 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandlöbes, S., Friák, M., Zaefferer, S., Dick, A., Yi, S., Letzig, D., Pei, Z., Zhu, L.-F., Neugebauer, J. and Raabe, D., Acta Materialia,60, 3011 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, S. R., Yoo, M. H. and Tome, C. N., Acta Materialia,49, 4277 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, S., Imagawa, S., Toyoda, T., Ohkubo, K. and Mohri, T., Materials Transactions, JIM, 49, 952 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mineta, T., Miura, S., Mukai, T., Ueda, M. and Mohri, T., J. Japan Inst. Met. Mater, 77, 466(2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hußnätter, W., Merklein, M., International Journal of Material Forming, 1, 233 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, A. and Teghtsoonian, E., Acta Metallurgica,17, 1351 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, P. W., J. Mote and J. E. Dorn,Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 221, 1148 (1961).Google Scholar
Ando, S., Tsushida, M. and Kitahara, H., Collected Abstracts of the 2013 Spring Meeting of the Japan Inst. Metals and Materials, No. 413 (2013).Google Scholar
Stohr, J. F. and Poirier, J. P., Philos. Mag., 25, 1313(1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, R. v., Angew, Z., Jounal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 8, 161 (1928)Google Scholar
Cotton, J. D. and Kaufman, M. J., Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia, 25, 2395 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar