Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T13:56:45.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Rhenium Alloying on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Directionally Solidified NiAl-Mo Eutectic Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Misra
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136.
Z. L. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136.
R. Gibala
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–2136.
Get access

Abstract

Low ductility of the reinforcing bcc metal phase at room temperature and weak interfaces can limit the intrinsic toughness and ductility of NiAl-bcc metal eutectic composites. The potential of rhenium (Re) addition, which is known to solid solution soften and lower the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of various bcc metals, to enhance the ductility and toughness of a directionally solidified NiAl-9 at.% Mo eutectic alloy was investigated. Re partitioned to the bcc metal phase and formed a substitutional solid solution. The interface morphology was changed from a faceted to a non-faceted one. Re alloying caused softening of the Mo fibers, and as a result NiAl-Mo(Re) alloys were softer in compression and flexure and had ∼20% higher fracture toughness values as compared to the transverse orientation toughness of NiAl-9Mo alloy. The toughness of the NiAl-Mo(Re) alloys was lower man the longitudinal orientation toughness of the NiAl-9Mo alloy due to the poor alignment of the Mo(Re) phase with the growth direction. The toughening mechanisms have been evaluated and schemes for processing NiAl-Mo(Re) alloys for higher toughness in the longitudinal orientation are suggested. The role of the residual interstitial impurities and partitioning of Ni and Al to Mo fibers on the mechanical properties are highlighted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pope, D.P. and Darolia, R., MRS Bulletin, May 1996, pp. 3036.Google Scholar
2. Walter, J.L. and Cline, H.E., Met. Trans., vol. 1, 1970, pp. 1221–29.Google Scholar
3. Walter, J.L. and Cline, H.E., Met. Trans., vol. 4, 1973, pp. 3338.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, D.R., Chen, X.F., Oliver, B.F., Noebe, R.D. and Whittenberger, J.D., Intermetallics, vol. 3, 1995, pp. 99113.Google Scholar
5. Heredia, F.E., He, M.Y., Lucas, G.E., Evans, A.G., Deve, H.E. and Konitzer, D., Acta Met., vol. 41, 1993, pp. 505511.Google Scholar
6. Joslin, S.M., Chen, X.F., Oliver, B.F. and Noebe, R.D., Mat. Sci. Engg., vol. 196A, 1995, pp. 918.Google Scholar
7. Misra, A. and Gibala, R., Met. Mater. Trans., in press.Google Scholar
8. Klopp, W.D., J. Less-Common Metals, vol. 42, 1975, pp. 261278.Google Scholar
9. Hahn, G.T., Gilbert, A. and Jaffee, R.I., in Refractory Metals and Alloys II, ed. by Semchyshen, M. and Perlmutter, I., Interscience Publishers, 1963, pp. 2364.Google Scholar
10. Brown, W. F. and Srawley, J.E., in Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials, ASTM STP No. 410, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1966, pp. 1314.Google Scholar
11. Hack, J.E., Brzeski, J.M., and Darolia, R., Scripta Metall. Mater, vol. 27, 1992, pp. 1259–64.Google Scholar
12. Levit, V.I., Bul, I.A., Hu, J. and Kaufman, M.J., Scripta Mat., vol. 34, 1996, pp. 19251930.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, D.R., Joslin, S.M., Reviere, R.D., Oliver, B.F. and Noebe, R.D., in Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials for High Temperature Applications-II, Ravi, V. A. and Srivatsan, T.S., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993, pp. 7790.Google Scholar
14. Subramaniam, P.R., Mendiratta, M.G. and Miracle, D.B., Metall. Mater. Trans., vol. 25A, 1994, pp. 27692781.Google Scholar
15. Cline, H.E., Walter, J.L., Koch, E.F. and Osika, L.M., Acta Met., vol. 19, 1971, pp. 405414.Google Scholar
16. Shang, J.K. and Ritchie, R.O., Metall. Trans., vol. 20A, 1989, pp. 897908.Google Scholar
17. Garmong, G. and Williams, J.C., Met. Trans., vol. 6A, 1975, pp. 17111719.Google Scholar
18. Chang, K.M., Darolia, R. and Lipsitt, H.A., Acta Metall. Mater., vol. 40, 1992, pp. 27272737.Google Scholar
19. Ravichandran, K.S., Scripta Metall. Mater., vol. 26, 1992, pp. 13891393.Google Scholar
20. Ashby, M.F. and Embury, J.D., Scripta Metall., vol. 19, 1986, pp. 557562.Google Scholar
21. Deve, H.E. and Maloney, M.J., Acta Metall. Mater., vol. 39, 1991, pp. 22752284.Google Scholar
22. Noebe, R.D., Misra, A. and Gibala, R., ISIJ International, vol. 31, 1991, pp. 11721185.Google Scholar
23. Venkateswara Rao, K.T., Soboyejo, W.O. and Ritchie, R.O., Metall. Trans., vol. 23A, 1992, pp. 22492257.Google Scholar
24. Guha, S., Munroe, P.R. and Baker, I., Mat. Sci. Engg., vol. 131A, 1991, pp. 2737.Google Scholar
25. Huang, S.C., Field, R.D. and Krueger, D.D., Metall. Trans., vol. 21A, 1990, pp. 959970.Google Scholar
26. Walter, J.L., Cline, H.E. and Koch, E.F., TMS-AIME, vol. 245, 1969, pp. 20732079.Google Scholar
27. Davidson, D.L. and Brotzen, F.R., Acta Metall., vol. 18, 1970, pp. 463470.Google Scholar
28. Arsenault, R.J., Acta Metall., vol. 15, 1967, pp. 501511.Google Scholar
29. Rinaldi, M.D., Sharp, R.M. and Flemings, M.C., Metall. Trans., vol. 3A, 1972, pp. 31333148.Google Scholar
30. Seigle, L.L. and Dickinson, C.D., in Refractory Metals and Alloys II, ed. by Semchyshen, M. and Perlmutter, I., Interscience Publishers, 1963, pp. 65116.Google Scholar