Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T12:42:04.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Deposition Phase Diagrams for Thin Film Si:H and Si1-xGex:H Using Real Time Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

N. J. Podraza
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606;
G. M. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Center for Thin Film Devices, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,PA 16802
C. R. Wronski
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Center for Thin Film Devices, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,PA 16802
R. W. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606;
Get access

Abstract

The growth of hydrogenated silicon (Si:H) and silicon-germanium alloys (Si1-xGex:H) by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) on crystalline silicon (c-Si) substrates has been studied by real time spectroscopic ellipsometry (RTSE). The motivation is to develop deposition phase diagrams that can provide greater insight into the optimization of amorphous Si1-xGex:H (a-Si1-xGex:H) for multijunction photovoltaics. In initial studies, the phase diagram for bottom cell a-Si1-xGex:H (Eg ˜ 1.4 eV) is found to exhibit fundamental similarities to that for Si:H when both materials are prepared under standard PECVD conditions that optimize pure a-Si:H. These similarities suggest directions for optimizing a-Si1-xGex:H by identifying conditions under which a smooth, stable surface is obtained to the largest possible bulk layer thickness. In phase diagram development for PECVD Si1-xGex:H on c-Si, it has been found that the highest surface stability and smoothest surfaces are obtained using cathodic deposition (self bias: ˜-20 V) with a H2-dilution level just below that of the amorphous-to-(mixed-phase microcrystalline) [→(a+μc)] transition for a thick layer. Due to the promising nature of these results, full phase diagrams are compared for cathodic and anodic Si1-xGex:H as well as for cathodic and anodic Si:H, all on c-Si substrates. The cathodic phase diagram for Si1-xGex:H reveals a narrow range of significant improvement in surface structural evolution near the →(a+μc) transition, and for a-Si:H reveals an extension of the ultrasmooth protocrystalline regime to a much wider range of thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yang, J., Banerjee, A., and Guha, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2975 (1997).10.1063/1.118761Google Scholar
2 Deng, X., Liao, X.B., Han, S.J., Povolny, H., and Agarwal, P., Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 62, 89 (2000).10.1016/S0927-0248(99)00139-7Google Scholar
3For a review see: Collins, R.W., Ferlauto, A.S., Ferreira, G.M., Chen, C., Koh, J., Koval, R., Lee, Y., Pearce, J.M., and Wronski, C.R., Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 78, 143 (2003).10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00436-1Google Scholar
4 Lu, Y., Kim, S., Gunes, M., Lee, Y., Wronski, C.R., and Collins, R.W., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 336, 595 (1994).10.1557/PROC-336-595Google Scholar
5 Wickboldt, P., Pang, D., Paul, W., Chen, J., Zhong, F., Chen, C., Cohen, J.D., and Williamson, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6252 (1997).10.1063/1.364413Google Scholar
6 Ganguly, G., Sakata, I., and Matsuda, A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 200, 300 (1996).10.1016/0022-3093(95)00691-5Google Scholar
7 Podraza, N.J., Ferreira, G.M., Albert, M.L., Wronski, C.R., and Collins, R.W., Proceedings of the 31st Photovoltaics Specialists Conference, (IEEE, New York, 2005), in pressGoogle Scholar
8 Fujiwara, H., Kondo, M., and Matsuda, A., Surf. Sci. 497, 333 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01665-XGoogle Scholar