Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:02:34.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Damage and Strain in Epitaxial Ge0.10Si0.90 After Si Implantation From 40 to 150 °C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Vantomme ,
J.H. Song ,
D.Y.C. Lie ,
F.H. Eisen ,
M.-A. Nicolet ,
T.K. Cams  and
K.L. Wang
A. Vantomme
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
J.H. Song
Affiliation:
On leave from Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysika, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, Postdoctoral Researcher, N.F.W.O. (National Fund for Scientific Research), Belgium
D.Y.C. Lie
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024
F.H. Eisen
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024
M.-A. Nicolet
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024
T.K. Cams
Affiliation:
On leave from Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
K.L. Wang
Affiliation:
On leave from Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The damage and strain produced in a nearly pseudomorphic Ge0.10Si0.90 film on Si(100) by implantation of 320 keV 28Si+ ions at 40 to 150 °C and doses from 1 to 30 x 10l4/cm2 have been measured by MeV 4He channeling spectrometry and high resolution x-ray diffractometry. Both the implantation-induced damage and strain are sensitive to the implantation temperatures. The damage as characterized by channeling decreases with the temperature of implantation for all doses and becomes minimal at 150 °C. The implantation-induced perpendicular strain does likewise, but an excess of about 6 % of its intrinsic strain remains at the strain maximum even at 150 °C.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 326: Symposium M – Growth, Processing, and Characterization of Semiconductor Heterostructures , 1993 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Haynes, T. E. and Holland, O. W.., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 61(1992).Google Scholar
2 Haynes, T. E. and Holland, O. W.., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B 81,901(1993).Google Scholar
3 Lie, D. Y. C., Vantomme, A., Eisen, F., Nicolet, M.-A., Cams, T. K. and Wang, K. L., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 6039 (1993)Google Scholar
4 Lie, D. Y. C., Vantomme, A., Eisen, F., Nicolet, M.-A., Arbet-Engels, V., and Wang, K. L., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 262,1079 (1993)Google Scholar
5 Bai, G. and Nicolet, M.-A., J. Appl. Phys. 71,4227(1992).Google Scholar
6 Bai, G. and Nicolet, M.-A., J. Appl. Phys. 70,649(1991).Google Scholar
7 Lie, D. Y. C., Vantomme, A., Eisen, F., Nicolet, M.-A., Arbet-Engels, V., and Wang, K. L., to be appeared in IEEE J. Electronic Mater. (1994)Google Scholar