Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:53:13.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atom Probe Studies of Interfaces in Metallic Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Alfred Cerezo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, U.K.
Jonathon M. Hyde
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, U.K.
Mark G. Hetherington
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, U.K.
Amanda K. Petford-Long
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

The atom probe field-ion microscope has been used to study the diffusion at interfaces in metallic multilayers deposited directly onto field-ion specimens and to develop models for the solid state reactions occuring at the atomic-scale in multilayer systems. Results are presented for the low temperature annealing of a Co-Ni multilayer. Intermixing over about 2 atomic planes is found even in as-deposited samples, extending to mnm after heating at 300°C for 1 hour. Using atom probe results from bulk alloys, a Monte Carlo simulation has been developed for the Fe-Cr system, in which a miscibility gap exists, and is being used in an attempt to model the behaviour of interfaces in Fe-Cr multilayers. Preliminary results are presented, showing that interfaces which are initially mixed over 10 atomic planes become sharper by an ‘interface spinodal’ reaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Synthetic modulated structure materials edited by Chang, L.L. and Giessen, B.C. (Academic Press, New York 1986).Google Scholar
2 Müller, E.W., Panitz, J.A. and McLane, S.B., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 39, 83 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Miller, M.K. and Smith, G.D.W., Atom Probe Microanalysis: Principles and Applications in Materials Science (MRS, Pittsburgh, 1990).Google Scholar
4. Cerezo, A., Godfrey, T.J. and Smith, G.D.W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 862 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Cerezo, A., Godfrey, T.J., Grovenor, C.R.M., Hetherington, M.G., Hyde, J.M., Liddle, L.A., Mackenzie, R.A.D. and Smith, G.D.W., EMSA Bulletin 20, 77 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Cerezo, A., Hetherington, M.G. and Petford-Long, A.K., J. de Phys. 50–C8, 349 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Melmed, A.J., J. de Phys. 50–C8 547 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Cerezo, A., Hyde, J.M., Hetherington, M.G. and Smith, G.D.W., to be published in Scripta. Metall. et Mater. 25, (1991).Google Scholar
9. Sundman, B., Janson, B. and Andersson, J., Calphad 9 (2), 13 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Broeder, F.J.A. den, Kuiper, D., Mosselaer, A.P. van der and Hoving, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2771 (1988).Google Scholar