Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:15:52.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Automated Image Analysis to the Study of Cement Paste Microstructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

David Darwin
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045
Mohamed Nagib Abou-Zeid
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045
Get access

Abstract

Digital acquisition and analysis of backscattered electron images provide powerful tools for the study of cement-based materials. The techniques can provide useful information on hydration phases, size distributions of unhydrated particles and voids, effects of changes in the watercementitious material ratio and the use of mineral admixtures, and the distribution of microcracks. The results of automated analyses of cement pastes with different water-cement ratios and pastes containing silica fume are presented. The analyses demonstrate that microstructural data vary significantly from image to image, requiring multiple images to limit the effects of scatter. The analyses also indicate that, although the pastes exhibit different degrees of hydration, the size distributions of the unhydrated cement particles are nearly identical. In contrast, the size distribution of larger voids differs significantly as a function of water-cementitious material ratio and with the use of silica fume as a partial replacement for cement. The calcium hydroxide content obtained based on image analysis exceeds but generally parallels that obtained with thermogravimetric analysis. The majority of microcracks in both nonloaded and loaded specimens occur through or adjacent to the lowest density hydration phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Scrivener, K. L. and Pratt, P. C. in Proc., 6th Intl. Conf. on Cement Microscopy (Albuquerque, NM, 1984).Google Scholar
2. Scrivener, K. L. and Gartner, E. M. in Bonding in Cementitious Composites, edited by Mindess, S. and Shah, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 114, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 7785.Google Scholar
3. Scrivener, K. L. in Pore Structure and Permeability of Cementitious Materials, edited by Roberts, L. R. and Skalny, J. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 137, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) pp. 129140.Google Scholar
4. Zhao, H. and Darwin, D., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, (4), 695 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Bonen, D. and Diamond, S., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, (6), 1059 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Ketcham, K. W., Romero, F. A., Darwin, D., Gong, S., Abou-Zeid, M. N., and Martin, J. L., SM Report No. 34, (University of Kansas Center for Res. 1993).Google Scholar
7. Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., Echlin, P., Joy, D. C., Romig, A. D., Fiori, C., and Lifshin, E., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 2nd ed. (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1992).Google Scholar
8. Ostle, B. and Malone, L. C., Statistics in Research, 4th ed., (Iowa State University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
9. Darwin, D., Abou-Zeid, M. N., Ketcham, K. W. in Proc., 16th Intl Conf. on Cement Microscopy (Richmond, VA, 1994).Google Scholar
10. Hjorth, L. in Microsilica in Concrete 1, paper 9 (Aalborg Portland, Denmark, 1982).Google Scholar
11. Groves, G. W., Cem. Concr. Res. 11 (5/6), 713 (1981).Google Scholar
12. Khayat, K. H. and Aïtcin, P. C. in Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete (Amer. Concr. Inst., SP–132, II, Detroit, MI, 1993) pp. 835872.Google Scholar