Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:24:35.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Theoretical Evaluation of Localised Corrosion in Radioactive Waste Canisters.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S.M. Sharland*
Affiliation:
Theoretical Physics Division, Harwell Laboratory, Didcot, Oxon OX1l ORA, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Under repository conditions, it is likely that radioactive waste canisters will be subjected to both uniform and localised corrosion. Localised corrosion can take many forms depending on the precise physical and chemical environment of the metal at the time of attack, but generally the rates of penetration are much greater than those associated with uniform corrosion. The most likely forms under aerated repository conditions are pitting and crevice corrosion. To ensure adequate radionuclide containment an allowance for these rates must be included in the final canister dimensions. It is considered the best way to predict long term penetration rates is to develop mathematical models, which include all the physical and chemical processes necessary to describe the system and use experimentally determined input parameters relating to these processes. These models must then draw on further experimental data for validation over short timescales. In this paper, we discuss several techniques of modelling long term pit propagation in waste canisters. The complexity of the problem has lead to a number of physical and chemical approximations in the modelling. We investigate the applicability and ranges of validity of several of the more common approximations, both in our own models and in the literature, and compare the predictions with experimental pit growth rates. An investigatation of the sensitivity of the models to the various empirical input parameters indicates which need to be determined most accurately.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sharland, S.M. and Tasker, P.W., ‘The Aeration Period of a Model Nuclear Waste Repository’, AERE Report, TP 1182 (1986)Google Scholar
2. Turnbull, A., Brit.Corr.J., 15 (4), 162 (1980)Google Scholar
3. Turnbull, A. and Thomas, J.G.N., NPL DMA Report(A), 11 (1979)Google Scholar
4. Turnbull, A. and Thomas, J.G.N., NPL DMA Report(A), 23 (1980)Google Scholar
5. Galvele, J.R., J.Electrochem. Soc., 123 (11),1438 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Galvele, J.R., Corros.Sci., 21 (8),551 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gravano, S.M. and Galvele, J.R., Corros. Sci., 24 (6),517 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Sharland, S.M. and Tasker, P.W., ‘A Mathematical Model of Crevice Corrosion: Part I- The Physical Model’ and ‘Part II- The Mathematical Solution8, AERE Reports, TP 1123 and TP 1124. (1985)Google Scholar
9. Jackson, C.P., ‘The TGSL Finite Element Subroutine Library’, AERE Report AERE-R 10713 (1982)Google Scholar
10. Jackson, C.P. and Sharland, S.M., to be published.Google Scholar
11. Marsh, G.P., Taylor, K.J., Bland, I.D., Westcott, C., Tasker, P.W. and Sharland, S.M., Proc. 9th International Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Waste Management, Stockholm. Editor Werme, L.. (1985)Google Scholar
12. Sharland, S.M., ‘A Mathematical Model of Crevice and Pitting Corrosion’, AERE Report, TP 1183 (1986)Google Scholar
13. Lever, D.A., Bradbury, M.H. and Hemingway, D.J., AERE Report, AERE-R 10614 (1982)Google Scholar
14. Turnbull, A. and Gardner, M.R., Corros.Sci. 22, 661 (1982)Google Scholar
15. Posey, F.A., Palko, A.A., ‘Corrosivity of Geothermal Brines’, Progress report for period up to June 1976, ORNL-TM 5688, December 1976.Google Scholar