Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-09T09:24:40.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Migrations of Interstitial Atoms in Semiconductors (Surface Diffusion and Kick-Out Mechanism)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Takao Wada
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa, Nagoya, 466, Japan
Akihiro Takeda
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa, Nagoya, 466, Japan
Masaya Ichimura
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa, Nagoya, 466, Japan
Michihiko Takeda
Affiliation:
Government Industrial Research Institute, Nagoya, 462, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Ge and Zn atoms were introduced into the unirradiated regions of Si at 150°C and GaAs wafers at 50°C, respectively by using the electron-beam doping method. The surfaces of Si and GaAs substrates were covered partially by the overlayers of Ge and Zn sheets, respectively. The only surfaces of the Ge and Zn sheets were irradiated locally. with high energy electrons at 7MeV with the fluences of 5×1017 – 1×1018 electrons cm-2 . Even at a distance of ~10mm from the irradiated overlayers in the Si and GaAs substrates, Ge and Zn atoms respectively, whose interstitials may migrate the unirradiated regions, were detected by SIMS measurements. PL signal due to band-to-acceptor (ZnGa ) transition at 1.48eV becomes observable after annealing at 800°C for 20mm in the unirradiated GaAs region, which is separated from Zn sheet by nearly 10mm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 for example, Corbett, J.W. and Bourgoin, J.C., in Point Defects in Solids. edited by Crawford, J.H. and Slifkin, L.M. (Plenum, New York. 1975), Vol.2, Chap.1.Google Scholar
2 Watkins, G.D., Radiation Damage in Semiconductors, edited by Baruch, P. (Paris; Dunod, 1965), p.97.Google Scholar
3 Nagata, S. and Tanaka, T., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 940 (1977).Google Scholar
4 Shibata, T., Kondo, E. and Nishinaga, T., 8th Record of Alloy Semiconductor Physics and Electronics Symposium, Kyoto, 1989, p.19.Google Scholar
5 Wada, T., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 182/183, 131 (1981).Google Scholar
6 Wada, T. and Hada, H., Phys. Rev. B 30, 3384 (1984).Google Scholar
7 Wada, T. and Takeda, A., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 37/38, 348 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Wada, T. and Takeda, A., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 37/38, 352 (1989).Google Scholar
9 Wada, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1056 (1988).Google Scholar
10 Wada, T. and Maeda, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2130 (1987).Google Scholar
11 Wada, T. and Maeda, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett 52, 60 (1988).Google Scholar
12 Boltzmann, L., Ann. Phys. 53, 948 (1894).Google Scholar
13 Crawford, J.H. Jr. and Slifkin, L.M., Point Defects in Solids (Plenum, New York, 1975), Vol.2, p.177; C. Matano, Jpn. J. Phys. 8, 109 (1933).Google Scholar
14 Bond, G.C., Catalysis by Metals (Academic Press, London, 1962).Google Scholar
15 Frank, W., Seeger, A. and Gosele, U., in Defects in Semiconductors (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), p.31.Google Scholar
16 Pons, D. and Bourgoin, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1293 (1981).Google Scholar