Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:09:53.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction Between Naphthalene Sulfonate and Silica Fume in Portland Cement Pastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Sidney Diamond  and
Leslie J. Struble
Sidney Diamond
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Leslie J. Struble
Affiliation:
Center for Building Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

Portland cement pastes were mixed with predissolved naphthalene sulfonate superplasticizer at normal water:cement ratios. Solutions were separated from the fresh pastes at intervals and the residual concentration of the superplasticizer determined by UV spectrophotometry. At low dosage levels essentially all of the superplasticizer was found to be removed from solution within a few minutes; at high dosage levels a substantial concentration was maintained in solution at least to approximately the time of set. In pastes in which silica fume replaced 10% by weight of the cement, it was found that the incorporation of silica fume significantly increased the uptake of superplasticizer. In separate trials it was found that the silica fume by itself adsorbed little superplasticizer, even from high pH solution simulating that of cement paste.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 114: Symposium R – Bonding in Cementitious Composites , 1987 , 117
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sellevold, E. J. and Radjy, F. F., in ACI Publ. SP-79, V. M. Malhotra, ed., v. II 677–694 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Buil, M., Paillere, A. M., and Roussel, B., Cem. Concr. Res. 14 693–704 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Aitcin, P.-C., Bedard, C., Plumat, M., and Haddad, G., Matls. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 42 201–210 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Aitcin, P.-C., Sarkar, S. L., and Diatta, Y., Matls. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 85 261–272 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Bentur, A. and Cohen, M. D., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 70 738–743 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Diamond, S., Proc. 8th Intl. Congr. Chem. Cement, Rio de Janeiro, v.1 122–147 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Daimon, M. and Roy, D. M., Cem. Concr. Res. 8 753–764 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Burk, A. A. Jr., Gaidis, J. M., and Rosenberg, A. M., “Adsorption of Naphthalene Based Superplasticizers on Different Cements,” 21 pp (preprint of a paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Superplasticizers in Concrete, Ottawa, 1981, but not published in the proceedings)Google Scholar
9. American Society for Testing and Materials, Designation C 305-82, “Standard Method for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency”, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, v. 04.01 (1986).Google Scholar