Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:47:38.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Dose Implantation of Nickel into Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

G. J. Campisi
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
H. B. DIETRICH
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5000
M. Delfino
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories Sunnyvale, Signetics Corp., Sunnyvale, CA 94086
D. K. Sadana
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories Sunnyvale, Signetics Corp., Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Get access

Abstract

Several silicon wafers were implanted with 58Ni+ at an energy of 170 keV and a current density of 12 μA cm-2 to doses between 5 × 1015 and 1.8 × 1018 ions cm-2. The substrates were phosphorus doped n-type <100> Czochralski grown silicon wafers. The wafers were water cooled during implantation and the surface temperatures was monitored with an infrared pyrometer and controlled to < 70°C. Samples were subsequently furnace annealed at 900°C for 30 min in nitrogen. The as-implanted and annealed samples were analyzed using cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM), Rutherford backscattering (RBS) spectroscopy, spreading resistance depth profiling (SRP), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Micro-crystallites of NiSi2 (2–5nm) buried within an amorphous matrix formed during the 1.5 × 1017 ions cm-2 dose implantation. For higher doses above 3 × 1017 Ni+ cm-2, ion beam sputtering occurred. After annealing, rapid diffusion of nickel and solid-phase recrystallization of the amorphous regions occurred.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pinizzotto, R.F., J. Crystal Growth 63, 559, (1983).Google Scholar
2. Lau, S.S., Matteson, S., Mayer, J.W., Revesz, P., Gyulai, J., Roth, J., Sigmon, T.W., and Cass, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 76, (1979).Google Scholar
3. Cheng, H.C. and Chen, L.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 562, (1985).Google Scholar
4. Baumvol, I.J.R.. in, Ion Implanation Science and Technology (ed. Ziegler, J.F. Academie Press, Orlando, FL, 1984), p.261.Google Scholar
5. Baglin, J.E.E., Clark, G.J. and Attinger, J., in Thin Films and Interface II (ed. Baglin, J.E.E., Campbell, D.R., Chu, W.K.) MRS Symp. Proc, Vol. 25, 179, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Ohsawa, A., Honda, K., and Toyokura, N., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 2964, (1984).Google Scholar
7. Hemment, P.L.F., Peart, R.F., Yao, M.F., Stephens, Y.G., Chater, R.J., Kiliner, J.A., Meekison, D., Booker, G.R., and Arrowsmith, R.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 952, (1985).Google Scholar
8. Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A30, 1, (1983).Google Scholar
9. Fathy, D., Holland, O.W., and Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 297, (1985).Google Scholar
10. Cannavo, S., Grimaldi, M.G., Rimini, E., Feria, G., and Gandolfi, , Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 138, (1985).Google Scholar
11. Biersach, J.P. and Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. Instr. Meth., 171 257, (1980).Google Scholar
12. Majni, G., Costato, M., and Panini, F., Thin Solid Films, 125, 71, (1985).Google Scholar