Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T02:12:00.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fracture Mechanical Properties of Rocks and Mortar/Rock Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Manouchehr Hassanzadeh
Manouchehr Hassanzadeh*
Affiliation:
Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Box 118, S221 00 Lund, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

This study has determined the fracture mechanical properties of 9 types of rock, namely fine-, medium- and coarse-grained granites, gneiss, quartzite, diabase, gabbro, and fine- and coarse-grained limestones. Test results show among other things that quartzite has the highest compressive strength and fracture energy, while diabase has the highest splitting tensile strength and modulus of elasticity. Furthermore, the strength and fracture energy of the interfacial zone between the rocks and 6 different mortars have been determined. The results showed that, in this investigation, the mortar/rock interfaces are in most cases weaker than both mortars and rocks.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 370: Symposia Va/Vb – Microstructure of Cement-Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cement... , 1994 , 377
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gustafsson, P. J., Fracture Mechanics Studies of Non-yielding Materials Like Concrete, PhD thesis, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden (1985).Google Scholar
2. Haghpassand, A., Fracture Mechanical Parameters of Normal- and High-Strength Concrete (in Swedish), Report No. TVBM-5024, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden (1992).Google Scholar
3. Hassanzadeh, M. and Haghpassand, A., in Utilization of High Strength Concrete, edited by Holand, I. and Sellevold, E. (Norwegian Concrete Association, P.O. Box 2312 Solli, N-0201, Oslo, 1992) pp. 1092–1099.Google Scholar
4. Hillerborg, A., Application of Fracture Mechanics to Concrete, Report No. TVBM-3030, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden (1988).Google Scholar
5. Persson, B., (private communication), Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden (1993).Google Scholar
6. Petersson, P.E., Crack Growth and Development of Fracture Zones in Plain Concrete and Similar Materials, PhD thesis, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden (1981).Google Scholar
7. RILEM Draft Recommendation, 50-FMC Committee Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, Materials and Structures, 18 (106), 285–290, (1985).Google Scholar