Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:33:49.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deposition of Thin Film SrFeO2.5+x by Pulsed Laser Ablation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Brian W. Sanders
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Environmental Chemistry, Ottawa, Canada, KIA 0R6
Michael L. Post
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Environmental Chemistry, Ottawa, Canada, KIA 0R6
Get access

Abstract

Pulsed laser ablation has been used to deposit thin perovskite films based on the formula: SrFeO2.5+x (x = 0 to ≈ 0.5). Good quality films have been deposited on (1102) and AT cut quartz substrates at temperatures ranging from 300 to 1130 K. Films grown below 770 K showed little or no preferential crystallinity. Temperatures around 913 K produced films predominantly oriented (200), while temperatures greater than 1000 K produced films with (110) orientation. Films were grown from pellets of two compositions (SrFeO2.5, and SrFeO≈3). The former had a higher ablation threshold than the latter. The atmosphere during cooling had a greater effect on the film's oxygen content than the growth atmosphere. Films cooled in vacuum had the brownmillerite structure (x=0), whereas films cooled in 53.3 kPa oxygen had the cubic perovskite structure (x≈0.5).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Post, M.L., Sanders, B.W., and Kennepohl, P. in Chemical Sensors, (Tech. Digest Fourth Int. Meeting Chemical Sensors, Tokyo, Japan, 1992) pp. 322325.Google Scholar
2. Takeda, Y., Kanno, K., Takada, T., Yamamoto, O., Takano, M., Nakayama, N. and Bando, Y., J. Solid State Chem., 63, 237 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Geohegan, D.B., J. Mat. Educ., 12, 383 (1990).Google Scholar