Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T02:11:16.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Plasma Oxidised Hg1-xCdxTe Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

P.W. Leech ,
R.L. Moore ,
E.E. Crisman ,
C.B. Roberts  and
P.J. Stiles
P.W. Leech
Affiliation:
AOTC Telecom Research Laboratories, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
R.L. Moore
Affiliation:
Evans East, Plainsboro, NJ 08536, USA
E.E. Crisman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
C.B. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
P.J. Stiles
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Get access

Abstract

We report for the first time on the application of Field Enhanced Plasma Oxidation (FEPO) to the passivation of Hg1-xCdxTe. Oxide layers of thickness 250-500Å were grown on Hg0.4Cd0.6Te at temperatures in the range from 30°C to 100°C. The index of refraction of the oxide layer, as determined by ellipsometry, was between 1.99 and 2.10. Auger depth profiles of the surfaces showed a compositional variation through the oxide with predominantly a mix of Cd and Te oxides in a film depleted in Hg. The oxides had dielectric constants of 3.6 to 4.5, and dielectric strength greater than 1 × 107 V/cm. The oxide/semiconductor interfaces had high densities of “slow” states but were capable of being depleted and accumulated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 259: Symposium B – Chemical Surface Preparation, Passivation and Cleaning for Semiconductor Growth and Processing , 1992 , 269
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Balcerak, R., Gibson, J., Gutierrez, W. and Pollard, J., Optical Engineering, 26, 191, (1987).Google Scholar
2. Nemirovsky, Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A8(2), 1185, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Makky, W.H., Siddiqui, A. and Tang, C.H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4(6), 3169, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Lang, M. and Lischka, K., J. Crystal Growth, 101, 566, (1990).Google Scholar
5. Nemirovsky, Y., Goshen, R. and Kidron, I., J. Appl. Phys. 53(7), 4888, (1982).Google Scholar
6. Noh, S.K., Crisman, E.E. and Stiles, P.J., J. Mats. Sci. Letts., 8, 10, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Crisman, E.E., Roberts, C.B. and Stiles, P.J., Materials Forum, 15, 171, (1991).Google Scholar
8. Nemirovsky, Y. and Bahir, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A7(2), 450, (1989).Google Scholar
9. Jensen, B. and Torabi, A., J. Appl. Phys., 54, 5945, (1983).Google Scholar
10. Wilson, R.G., Stevie, F.A. and Magee, C.W., Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, J. Wiley and Sons, (1989).Google Scholar
11. Muller, R.H., Principles of Ellipsometry, Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, Vol. 9, Optical Techniques in Electrochemistry, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, (1973).Google Scholar