Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:25:26.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding behaviour of the mussel, Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

B. L. Bayne ,
J. I. P. Iglesias ,
A. J. S. Hawkins ,
E. Navarro ,
M. Heral  and
J. M. Deslous-Paoli
B. L. Bayne
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH.
J. I. P. Iglesias
Affiliation:
Departomento de Biologia Animal y Genetica, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Apartado 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain.
A. J. S. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH.
E. Navarro
Affiliation:
Departomento de Biologia Animal y Genetica, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Apartado 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain.
M. Heral
Affiliation:
IFREMER, BP133, 17390 La Tremblade, France
J. M. Deslous-Paoli
Affiliation:
IFREMER, BP133, 17390 La Tremblade, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mussels were fed four concentrations of seston (between 0·99 and 10·3 mg total seston I−1), comprising three levels of organic content (71·9, 63·6 and 40·8%), made up from natural silt and two species of cultured phytoplankton. Two of the seston concentrations were below, and two above, the threshold at which pseudofaeces were produced. Measurements of physiological traits (filtration rates, pseudofaeces production, selection efficiency, absorption efficiency, absorption rates and rates of oxygen consumption) were made after 2 days and, for two of the seston concentrations, also after 12 days. When fed at a high concentration of seston of low organic content, the mussels increased their filtration rate, rejected a higher proportion of filtered material as pseudofaeces, and increased the efficiency with which filtered matter of higher organic content was selected for ingestion; this resulted in a constancy of the relationship between ingestion rate and the concentration of particulate organic matter, regardless of differences in seston organic content. Between 2 and 12 d, the mussels increased absorption rates for organics, primarily by increasing absorption efficiency, both for total organics and for the carbohydrate component of the diet. We suggest that these responses to changes in the food environment comprise physiological adjustments which result in higher net rates of absorption than would be predicted from considerations only of the organic/inorganic ratio of the suspended particles and assumptions of a non-compensating feeding behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , November 1993 , pp. 813 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, B.L., Hawkins, A.J.S. & Navarro, E., 1987. Feeding and digestion by the mussel Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia: Mollusca) in mixtures of silt and algal cells at low concentrations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 111, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B.L., Hawkins, A.J.S. & Navarro, E., 1988. Feeding and digestion in suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: the relevance of physiological compensations. American Zoologist, 28, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B.L., Hawkins, A.J.S., Navarro, E. & Iglesias, J.I.P., 1989. Effects of seston concentration on feeding, digestion and growth in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 55, 47–54.Google Scholar
Bayne, B.L. & Newell, R.C., 1983. Physiological energetics of marine molluscs. In The Mollusca, vol. 4. Physiology, part 1 (ed. A.S.M., Saleuddin and K.M., Wilbur), pp. 407–515. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bligh, E.G. & Dyer, W.J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bricelj, V.M. & Malouf, R.E., 1984. Influence of algal and suspended sediment concentrations on the feeding physiology of the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria. Marine Biology, 84, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, V., 1989. Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) hepatopancreas: cellulase kinetics and cellulolysis of living monocellular algae with cellulose walls. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 128, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, R.J., 1966. Factors affecting the assimilation of organic matter by zooplankton and the question of superfluous feeding. Limnology and Oceanography, 11, 346–354.Google Scholar
Dubois, M.K., Gillis, A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebens, P.A. & Smith, F., 1956. A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, P.J., 1987. Relation of crystalline style function to food availability and environmental conditions in South African mussels. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
Fielding, P.J. & Davis, C.L., 1989. Carbon and nitrogen resources available to kelp bed filter feeders in an upwelling environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 55, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, C.L. & Griffiths, R.J., 1987. Bivalvia. In Animal energetics (ed. T.J., Pandian and F.J., Vernberg), pp. 1–88. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A.J.S. & Bayne, B.L., 1985. Seasonal variation in the relative utilization of carbon and nitrogen by the mussel Mytilus edulis: budgets, conversion efficiencies and maintenance requirements. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 181–188.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A.J.S. & Bayne, B.L., 1992. Physiological interrelations, and the regulation of production. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture (ed. E., Gosling), pp. 171–222. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A.J.S., Navarro, E. & Iglesias, J.I.P., 1990. Comparative allometries of gut passage time, gut content and metabolic faecal loss in Mytilus edulis and Cerastoderma edule. Marine Biology, 105, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, J.I.P., Navarro, E., Alvarez, Jorna P. & Armentia, I., 1992. Feeding, particle selection and absorption in cockles Cerastoderma edule (L.) exposed to variable conditions of food concentration and quality. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 162, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, C.B., 1990. Bivalve filter feeding: hydrodynamics, bioenergetics, physiology and ecology. Fredensborg: Olsen and Olsen.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C.B., Larsen, P.S., Mahlenberg, F. & Riisgärd, H.U., 1988. The mussel pump: properties and modelling. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 45, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiørboe, T. & Møhlenberg, F., 1981. Particle selection in suspension-feeding bivalves. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 5, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Fair, A.L. & Randall, R.J., 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, M.I., Newell, R.C., Shumway, S.E., Seiderer, L.J. & Bally, R., 1987. Particle clearance and yield in relation to bacterioplankton and suspended particulate availability in estuarine and open coast populations of the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 36, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J.B. & Weinstein, D.B., 1966. Simple charring method for determination of lipids. Journal of Lipid Research, 7, 574–576.Google Scholar
Navarro, E., Iglesias, J.I.P. & Ortega, M.M., 1992. Natural sediment as a food source for the cockle Cerastoderma edule (L.): effect of variable particle concentration on feeding, digestion and the scope for growth. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 156, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, E., Iglesias, J.I.P., Perez, Camacho A., Labarta, U. & Berias, R., 1991. The physiological energetics of mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk.) from different cultivation rafts in the Ria de Arosa (Galicia, N.W. Spain). Aquaculture, 94, 197–212.Google Scholar
Newell, C.R., Shumway, S.E., Cucci, T.L. & Selvin, R., 1989. The effects of natural seston particle size and type on feeding rates, feeding selectivity and food resource availability for the mussel Mytilus edulis Linnaeus, 1758 at bottom culture sites in Maine. Journal of Shellfish Research, 8, 187–196.Google Scholar
Newell, R.I.E. & Jordan, S.J., 1983. Preferential ingestion of organic material by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 13, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, S.E., Cucci, T.L., Newell, R.C. & Yentsch, C.M., 1985. Particle selection, ingestion and absorption in filter-feeding bivalves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 91, 77–92.Google Scholar
Stenton-Dozey, J.M.E. & Brown, A.C., 1992. Clearance and retention efficiency of natural suspended particles by the rock-pool bivalve Venerupis corrugatus in relation to tidal availability. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 82, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, R.I., Fieth, P. & Worrall, C.M., 1979. Relationships between seston, available food and feeding activity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 50, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willows, R.I., 1992. Optimal digestive investment: a model for filter feeders experiencing variable diets. Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 829–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar