Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T23:29:57.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anaerobic Survival of the Crustaceans Corophium Volutator, C. Arenarium and Tanais Chevreuxi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. C. Gamble
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, University College of North Wales, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, U.K.

Extract

The overriding metabolic advantages of aerobic as compared with anaerobic respiration have resulted in its use by the majority of multicellular organisms. However, in some habitats oxygen is limiting to such an extent that anaerobic respiration becomes a necessity for survival. It has frequently been demonstrated that the extent of anaerobiosis depends, obviously, on the degree of oxygenation of the environment (see reviews by von Brand, 1944, 1945; Beadle, 1961). Hence, not only are there entirely anaerobic organisms but many other organisms exist which, in times of anoxic stress, are able to undergo a partial, or facultative, anaerobiosis. Lindeman (1942) discovered that, at low temperature, aquatic chironomid larvae could survive the entire winter anaerobically in the anoxic hypolimnion of freshwater lakes. Similarly, but to a lesser extent, pond-living crayfish of the genus Cambarus are more resistant to low oxygen concentration than stream-living individuals (Park, 1945). Walshe (1948) has also been able to establish a similar relationship in a group of stream and ditch dwelling chironomid larvae.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. W. & Reisch, D. J., 1967. The effects of varied dissolved oxygen concentrations and temperature on the wood-boring isopod genus Limnoria. Marine Biol., Vol. 1, pp. 56–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augenfield, J. M., 1967a. Respiratory metabolism and glycogen storage in barnacles occupying different levels of the intertidal zone. Physiol. Zoöl., Vol. 40, pp. 92–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augenfield, J. M., 1967b. Effects of oxygen deprivation on aquatic midge larvae under natural and laboratory conditions. Physiol. Zoöl., Vol. 40, pp. 149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H., Finlayson, D. M. & Piatigorsky, J., 1963. The effect of desiccation and anaerobic conditions on the behaviour, survival and general metabolism of three common cirripedes. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 32, pp. 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, L. C., 1961. Adaptations of some aquatic animals to low oxygen levels and to anaerobic conditions. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., Vol. 15, pp. 120–31.Google Scholar
Beanland, F. L., 1940. Sand and mud communities in the Dovey estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 589611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brafield, A. E., 1964. The oxygen content of interstitial water in sandy shores. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 97116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1958. Survival of anaerobic periods by two intertidal polychaetes, Arenicola marina (L.) and Ozvenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 521–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J., 1952. Probit Analysis. 318 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, J. C., 1970. The responses of the marine Crustacea Corophium arenarium, C. volutator and Tanais chevreuxi to gradients and to choices of different dissolved oxygen concentrations (in the Press).Google Scholar
George, R. Y., 1966. Glycogen content in the wood boring isopod, Limnoria lignorum. Science, N.Y., Vol. 153, pp. 1262–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, M. S., 1960. Anaerobiosis in marine sandy beaches. Science, N.Y., Vol. 132, pp. 616–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammen, C. S. & Lum, S. C., 1966. Fumarate reductase and succinate dehydrogenase activities in bivalve molluscs and brachiopods. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 19, pp. 775–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacubowa, L. & Malm, E., 1931. Die Beziehungen einiger Benthos-Formen des Schartzen Meeres zum Medium. Biol. Zbl., Bd. 51, pp. 105–16.Google Scholar
Lindeman, R. L., 1942. Experimental simulation of winter anaerobiosis in a senescent lake. Ecology, Vol. 23, pp. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcleese, D. W., 1956. Effects of temperature, salinity and oxygen on the survival of the American Lobster. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 13, pp. 247–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S., 1964a. Substrate selection by Corophium species: the particle sizes of substrates. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S., 1964b. Experiments on substrate selection by Corophium species: films and bacteria on sand particles. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 41, pp. 491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E., 1965. The activity rhythm of the amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) and its possible relationship to changes in hydrostatic pressure associated with the tides. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 34, pp. 731–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, P. R., 1955. Heat death. I. Time-temperature relationships in marine animals. Physiol. Zoöl., Vol. 28, pp. 290–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T., 1945. A further report on tolerance experiments by ecological classes. Ecology, Vol. 26, pp. 305–8.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. A. & Johansen, K., 1967. Aspects of oxygen uptake in Mesochaetopterus taylori, a tube dwelling polychaete. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 133, pp. 600–5.Google Scholar
Reisch, D. J., 1966. Relationship of polychaetes to varying dissolved oxygen concentrations. Third Int. Conf. Water Pollution Res., Munich, Sect. 3, Paper 10, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Shepard, M. P., 1955. Resistance and tolerance of young speckled trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) to oxygen lack, with special reference to low oxygen acclimation. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 12, pp. 387446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. H., 1952. Some notes on the taxonomy, the distribution and the ecology of four species of the amphipod genus Corophium (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Beaufortia, No. 21, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Teal, J. M., 1959. Respiration in crabs in Georgia salt marshes and its relation to their ecology. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 23, pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teal, J. M. & Carey, F. G., 1967. The metabolism of marsh crabs under conditions of reduced oxygen pressure. Physiol. Zoöl., Vol. 40, pp. 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theede, H., Ponat, A., Hiroki, K. & Schleiper, C., 1969. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biol., Vol. 2, pp. 325–37.Google Scholar
Von Brand, T., 1944. Occurrence of anaerobiosis among invertebrates. Biodynamica, Vol. 4, pp. 185328.Google Scholar
Von Brand, T., 1945. The anaerobic metabolism of invertebrates. Biodynamica, Vol. 5, pp. 115296.Google Scholar
Walshe, B. M., 1948. The oxygen requirement and thermal resistance of chironomid larvae from flowing and from still water. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 25, pp. 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1940. The yearly life cycle of the amphipod Corophium volutator. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 10, pp. 7793.Google Scholar
Wells, M. M., 1913. The resistance of fishes to different oxygen concentrations and combinations of carbon dioxide and oxygen. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 25, pp. 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, R. J., 1938. A syringe pipette method for the determination of oxygen in the field. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 15, pp. 564–70.Google Scholar
Wieser, W. & Kanwisher, J., 1959. Respiration and anaerobic survival of some sea weed inhabiting invertebrates. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 117, pp. 584600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymouth, F. W., Crimson, J. M., Hall, V. E., Belding, M. S. & Field, J., 1944. Total tissue respiration in relation to body weight. A comparison of the kelp crab with other crustaceans and with mammals. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 17, pp. 5071.Google Scholar
Zeuthen, E., 1953. Oxygen uptake as related to body size in organisms. Q. Rev. Biol., Vol. 28, pp. 112.Google Scholar