Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:43:54.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A phylogenetic study of a tropical sea urchin, Echinometra sp. EZ (Echinoidea: Camarodonta: Echinometridae) from the Persian Gulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2022

Seyedeh Mojgan Kalantarian*
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran
Bita Archangi
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran
Tooraj Valinassab
Affiliation:
Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran
Hassan Rajabi-Maham
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, Tehran 1983963113, IR, Iran
Rahim Abdi
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran
*
Authors for correspondence: Seyedeh Mojgan Kalantarian, E-mail: smk_1272@yahoo.com; Bita Archangi, E-mail: bita.archangi@gmail.com

Abstract

Sea urchins have important effects on marine ecosystems such as rocky shores and coral reefs across the world. However, species diversity and molecular phylogeny of most echinoid taxa are poorly known in Iran. In this study, the phylogenetic relationships of one of the most abundant species of the genus Echinometra in the Persian Gulf were examined. Echinoids were collected from the intertidal zone of Qeshm Island and Lengeh Port on March and December 2017. Morphological criteria based on valid identification keys combined with molecular analysis of a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) protein-coding gene were used to delineate Echinometra species. Our analyses showed that all specimens (N = 15) belong to Echinometra sp. EZ. Tree topologies indicated that our individuals from two sampling sites formed a distinct monophyletic clade with E. sp. EZ, demonstrating high support values. This is the first phylogenetic analysis of E. sp. EZ from Iran.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abràmoff, MD, Magalhães, PJ and Ram, SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11, 3642.Google Scholar
Arakaki, Y, Uehara, T and Fagoonee, I (1998) Comparative studies of the genus Echinometra from Okinawa and Mauritius. Zoological Society of Japan 15, 159168.Google ScholarPubMed
Bak, RPM (1990) Patterns of echinoid bioerosion in two Pacific coral reef lagoons. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66, 267272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, AC (1999) Symbiosis ecology of reef-building corals. PhD Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.Google Scholar
Blainville, H (1825) Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles, dans lequel untraité méthodiquement des différences tetres de la nature.Google Scholar
Bronstein, O and Loya, Y (2013) The taxonomy and phylogeny of Echinometra (Camarodonta: Echinometridae) from the Red Sea and Western Indian Ocean. PLoS ONE 8, e77374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronstein, O and Loya, Y (2014) Echinoid community structure and rates of herbivory and bioerosion on exposed and sheltered reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 456, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiro-Silva, M and McClanahan, TR (2001) Echinoid bioerosion and herbivory on Kenyan coral reefs: the role of protection from fishing. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 262, 133153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, AM and Rowe, FWE (1971) Monograph of Shallow-Water Indo-West Pacific Echinoderms. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Döderlein, L (1906) Die Echinoiden der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee Expedition auf dem Dampfer. Valdivia, 1898–1899 5, 63–350.Google Scholar
Downing, N and El-Zahr, CR (1987) Gut evacuation and filling rates in the rock-boring sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei. Bulletin of Marine Science 41, 579584.Google Scholar
Kelso, DP (1970) Morphological variation, reproductive periodicity, gamete compatibility and habitat specialization in two species of the sea urchin Echinometra in Hawaii. PhD thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ketchum, RN, DeBiasse, MB, Ryan, JF, Burt, JA and Reitzel, AM (2018) The complete mitochondrial genome of the sea urchin, Echinometra sp. EZ. Mitochondrial DNA B 3, 12251227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 15471549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landry, C, Geyer, LB, Arakaki, Y, Uehara, T and Palumbi, SR (2003) Recent speciation in the Indo-West Pacific: rapid evolution of gamete recognition and sperm morphology in cryptic species of sea urchin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 18391847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, JM (1983) Alternate states of populations of Echinometra mathaei (De Blainville) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the Gulf of Suez and the Gulf of Aqaba. Bulletin of the Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries 9, 141147.Google Scholar
Lessios, HA, Lockhart, S, Collin, R, Sotil, G, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Zigler, KS, Perez, AF, Garrido, MJ, Geyer, LB, Bernardi, G, Vacquier, VD, Haroun, R and Kessing, BD (2012) Phylogeography and bindin evolution in Arbacia, a sea urchin genus with an unusual distribution. Molecular Ecology 21, 130144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuoka, N and Hatanaka, T (1991) Molecular evidence for the existence of four sibling species within the sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei in Japanese waters and their evolutionary relationships. Zoological Science 8, 121133.Google Scholar
McClanahan, TR, Kamukuru, AT, Muthiga, NA, Yebio, MG and Obura, D (1996) Effect of sea urchin reductions on algae, coral, and fish populations. Conservation Biology 10, 136154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, TR and Kurtis, JD (1991) Population regulation of the rock-boring sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 147, 121146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, TR and Muthiga, NA (2001) The ecology of Echinometra. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science 32, 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, T (1943) Monograph of the Echinoidea: Camarodonta. Copenhagen: C.A Reitzel.Google Scholar
Motokawa, T (1991) Introduction to the symposium Echinometra a complex under speciation. In Yanagisawa, T, Yasumasu, I, Oguro, C, Suzuki, N and Motokawa, T (eds), Biology of Echinodermata. Rotterdam: Balkema Press, p. 89.Google Scholar
Moulin, L, Grosjean, P, Leblud, J, Batigny, A, Collard, M and Dubois, P (2015) Long-term mesocosms study of the effects of ocean acidification on growth and physiology of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei. Marine Environmental Research 103, 103114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakano, T, Kawamura, M and Satoh, TP (2019) First record of tropical sea urchin Echinometra sp. C from Honshu, Japan. Japanese Journal of Benthology 73, 109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylander, JAA (2004) MrModeltest Version 2. Program Distributed by the Author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Palumbi, SR (1996) What can molecular genetics contribute to marine biogeography? An urchin's tale. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 203, 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, SR (1997) Molecular biogeography of the Pacific. Coral Reefs 16, 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, SR and Lessios, HA (2005) Evolutionary animation: how do molecular phylogenies compare to Mayr's reconstruction of speciation patterns in the sea? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 65666572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, SR and Metz, EC (1991) Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Molecular Biology and Evolution 8, 227239.Google Scholar
Price, AR (1983) Echinoderms of Saudi Arabia. Echinoderms of the Persian Gulf coast of Saudi Arabia. Fauna of Saudi Arabia 5, 28108.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F, Teslenko, M, Van Der Mark, P, Ayres, DL, Darling, A, Höhna, S, Larget, B, Liu, L, Suchard, MA and Huelsenbeck, JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 6, 539542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, AR (1977) Water flow and the distribution and abundance of echinoids (genus Echinometra) on an Hawaiian reef. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 28, 693702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G1C content biases. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9, 678687.Google Scholar
Uehara, T, Shingaki, M and Taira, K (1986) Taxonomic studies in the sea urchin, genus Echinometra, from Okinawa and Hawaii. Zoological Science 3, 1114.Google Scholar