Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:22:53.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communal Irrigation, State, and Capital in the Chiang Mai Valley (Northern Thailand): Twentieth-Century Transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2011

Paul T. Cohen  and
Ross E. Pearson
Paul T. Cohen
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Ross E. Pearson
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transformations this century in communal irrigation in the Chiang Mai Valley, northern Thailand, are examined under the impact of political and economic changes such as state centralization, the intensification of capitalist agriculture, and urbanization. An anthropological political economy perspective is applied in placing anthropological subjects (irrigation weir communities and their leaders) at the intersection of local, national and global processes which allows scope for the agency of these subjects within the structural constraints imposed by political economy changes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 86 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Roseberry, William, “Political Economy”, Annual Review of Anthropology 17 (1988): 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Gypmantasiri, Phrek et al. , An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Cropping Systems in the Chiang Mai Valley: Key Questions for Research (Chiang Mai: Faculty of Agriculture, University of Chiang Mai, 1980), p. 40Google Scholar.

3 Takaya, Yoshikazu, “Land Reform and Rice-Growing” in Thailand: A Rice-Growing Society, ed. Ishii, Yoneo (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1978), p. 178Google Scholar.

4 Tanabe, Shigeharu, Ecology and Practical Technology: Peasant Farming Systems in Thailand (Bangkok: White Lotus, 1994), pp. 32, 130Google Scholar.

5 The destruction of the weirs was functional during heavy flooding in that it reduced water levels in the canals and thereby prevented severe flood damage to rice plants during panicle formation. Tanabe, Ecology and Practical Technology, p. 128.

6 Ibid., p. 29.

7 Most of these customary regulations were formalized in the Phraradchabanyat Kanconprathan Ratsadon, 2482 (People's Irrigation Act, 1939) (Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture)Google Scholar.

8 Tanabe, Ecology and Practical Technology, p. 29.

9 There is some evidence that traditionally the state was called upon to intervene occasionally in upstream/downstream disputes between weir communities. For example, the Khun Khong weir in present-day San Pa Tong district (see Map 1) was originally built by Lua villagers who had migrated from Hang Dong. In the 1840s a bitter dispute developed between these villagers and a Shan (Ngiaw) community downstream before the weir was completed. Eventually the dispute was taken to a senior aristocrat, Cao Hor Muang Kaeo, who decided in favour of the Shan, Cohen, Paul T., “The Politics of Economic Development in Northern Thailand, 1967-1978” (Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1981), p. 36Google Scholar.

10 Yoneo Ishii, “History and Rice-growing” in History and Rice-Growing, ed. Yoneo Ishii, xspp. 21, 22; Nimmanahaeminda, Kraisri, “The Irrigation Laws of King Mengrai”, in Ethnographic Notes on Northern Thailand, ed. Hanks, Lucien M., Hanks, Jane R. and Sharp, Lauriston, Southeast Asia Data Paper No. 58 (Ithaca: Cornell University, 1965Google Scholar); Surarerks, Vanpen, Historical Development and Management of Irrigation Systems in Northern Thailand (Chiang Mai: Department of Geography, Chiang Mai University, 1986), pp. 81–100Google Scholar.

11 Calavan, Sharon, “Aristocrats and Commoners in Rural Northern Thailand” (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1975Google Scholarxs); Cohen, Paul T., “Irrigation and the Northern Thai State in the Nineteenth Century” in Patterns and Illusions: Thai History and Thought, ed. Wijeyewardene, Gehan (Canberra: Richard Davis Fund & Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Second Edition, 1993)Google Scholar.

12 Potter, Jack M., Thai Peasant Social Structure (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1976), pp. 84, 102Google Scholar.

13 Ishii, “History and Rice-Growing”, p. 23.

14 Lieberman, J.B., Burmese Administrative Cycles: Anarchy and Conquest c. 1580-1760 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 278–92Google Scholar.

15 Ganjanapan, Anan, “The Partial Commercialization of Rice Production in Northern Thailand, 1900-1981” (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, Ithaca, 1984), pp. 32–43Google Scholar.

16 Cohen, “The Politics of Economic Development in Northern Thailand”, p. 40.

17 McKay, Elaine, “Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries: The Significance of the Coming of the Europeans” in Studies in Indonesian History, ed. McKay, Elaine (Carlton, Australia: Pitman, 1976), p. 113Google Scholar.

18 Calavan, “Aristocrats and Commoners”, pp. 136-37; Cohen, “Irrigation and the Northern Thai State”, pp. 60-62.

19 Coclanis, Peter A., “Southeast Asia's Incorporation into the World Rice Market”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 24,2 (1993): 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Ingram, James K., Economic Change in Thailand, 1850-1970 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1971), p. 34Google Scholar.

21 Shigeharu Tanabe, “Land Reclamation in the Chao Phraya Delta” in Thailand; A Rice-Growing Society, ed. Yoneo Ishii.

22 Cohen, “Irrigation and the Northern Thai State”.

23 Between 1910 and 1925 rice exports from Northern Thailand to Burma ranged from 5,000 to 20,000 piculs. A picul is a unit of measurement which was equivalent to 60.48 kilograms until 1923 when it was changed to sixty kilograms. Ingram, Economic Change in Thailand, p. 40.

24 Ingram, Economic Change in Thailand, p. 38.

25 Sethakul, Ratanaporn, “Political, Social and Economic Changes in the Northern States of Thailand Resulting from the Chiang Mai Treaties of 1874 and 1883” (Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Dekalb, 1989), pp. 326–27Google Scholar.

26 Economic Conditions in Siam, Reports (London: HMSO, 1923, 1924, 1926, 1938Google Scholar).

27 Feeney, David, The Political Economy of Productivity: Thai Agricultural Development, 1880-1975 (Vancouver & London: University of British Columbia Press, 1982), pp. 77, 80Google Scholar.

28 Phathalung, Prani Sirithon na, Phet Lanna (Lanna Luminaries), 2 vols. (Chiang Mai: Suriwong, 1963), p. 294Google Scholar.

29 One rai = 0.16 hectare.

30 For details of land allocations see Cohen, Paul T. “Aristocracy, Irrigation and the Early Commercialisation of Rice Farming in Northern Thailand”, ASSESS (Australian Studies in Southeast Asian Issues) Journal 2 (1996): 10–21Google Scholar.

31 The proportion of non-glutinous rice exported increased markedly after about 1920. By the early 1930s, thirty per cent of the land around Chiang Mai was planted to non-glutinous rice, Zimmerman 1931 cited at Anan, “The Partial Commercialization of Rice Production”, p. 155. By this time non-staples were also increasingly relied on in an attempt to diversify commodity production (BCR 1934: 27 cited at Ibid.). The need for diversification arose because the rice boom of the 1920s had drawn households increasingly into debt with Chinese traders and with the onset of the depression and lower rice prices in the 1930s, debt repayment became more difficult. Ibid., p. 153.

32 Vanpen, The Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, p. 202.

33 Ibid., pp. 210-11.

34 Ibid., p. 204

35 The cost and scale of the two northern projects was low relative to national expenditures on irrigation, particularly those in the Central Plain, Ingram, Economic Change in Thailand 1850-1970, p. 84.

36 Vanpen, The Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, p. 216.

37 The name of the country was officially changed from Siam to Thailand in 1939.

38 Tambunlertchai, Somsak, “Economic Prospects and External Economic Relations in Thailand”, Asian Development Review 1,2 (1989): 88–112Google Scholar.

39 The Economics of Watershed Management: A Case Study of Mae Taeng (Bangko: Natural Resources and Environment Program, Thailand Development Research Institute & Harvard Institute for International Development, 1995), p.16Google Scholar.

40 Vanpen, Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, pp. 203-216; Phrek et al., An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Cropping Systems, Table 2.4, p. 20.

41 Nevertheless, this represents a significant increase since the early 1980s when state projects irrigated about one third (34 per cent or 322,900 rai) compared to almost two-thirds (64 per cent or 600,000 rai) irrigated by the communal systems, Vanpen, Historical Development and Management of Irrigation Systems, p. 2.

42 Feeney, The Political Economy of Productivity, p. 113.

43 Chapman, E.C., “An Appraisal of Recent Agricultural Changes in the Northern Valleys of Thailand”, paper prepared for a meeting of the Sixth Academic Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society of Thailand at Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 1967Google Scholar.

44 Phrek et al.. An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Cropping Systems, Fig. 3, p. 66.

45 Tongsiri, Benchavan, Lerttamrab, Pichit and Thodey, Alan R., Agro-Economic Characteristics of the Chiang Mai Valley, 1972-1973 (Chiang Mai: Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, 1975), p. 58Google Scholar.

46 Ecological conditions have also played a role in multi-cropping in these districts. San Pa Tong district is well-known for its good soils and reliable water from the Mae Wang watershed, while low-lying areas of the alluvial plain in Saraphi district are more advantaged than others in terms of water reliability.

47 Phrek et al. An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Cropping Systems, p. 21.

48 Ibid., p. 89.

49 Theppachonchevin, Peerathep, “Irrigated Agriculture in the Third Development Plan and in the Northern Region”, in Irrigated Agriculture in the Northern Region, Seminar Report No. 5 (Chiang Mai: Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, 1974), p. 7Google Scholar.

50 Phrek et al., An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Cropping Systems, p. 89.

51 Cohen, “The Politics of Economic Development”, pp. 219-46.

52 The Mae Ngat and Mae Kuang reservoirs also have the capacity to generate electricity.

53 Vanpen gives an example of flood damage in 1975 to traditional weirs in the lower plain of the Mae Chaem River which required the felling of 8,000 trees for repair, Historical Development of Irrigation Systems p. 126. Also, Tanabe calculated that, in 1975 (a normal year), requisitions for a single small weir in Mae Rim district for two repairs were 780 large wooden stakes and 24,000 small stakes. He estimates that two to three times this amount would have been needed in years of heavy flooding, Ecology and Practical Technology, p. 146.

54 Traditionally, wood and bamboo for the weir repairs were obtained from nearby dry dipterocarp forests called paa phae, an elevated hilly zone between the alluvial plains and the mountains. This was also an area for the collection of free, subsistence resources such as fuel and edible plants. Since the 1920s, when population pressure began to limit the extension of wet-rice cultivation, this zone has been increasingly used for the cultivation of swidden crops such as sugar, soyabeans, chilli, tobacco and dry rice. After the student uprising of October 1973 and student and peasant agitation for land reform a number of land reform settlements were established in this zone by government agencies (e.g. Agricultural Land Reform Office) to allocate land to poor, landless villagers. Outside these settlements large areas of this zone have been used, since the 1970s, for orchards (longan, mandarins). Often they have been established by absentee, urban investors who have had the capital to build small dams and sink artesian bores.

55 Vanpen, Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, p. 284.

56 Ibid., p. 108.

57 Ibid., pp. 231-78.

58 Ibid., pp. 240, 241.

59 Neher, Clark, “District-Level Politics in Northern Thailand” (Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 1969), pp. 113–25Google Scholar; Cohen, “The Politics of Economic Development”, pp. 230-34; Vanpen, Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, p. 192.

60 Vanpen, Historical Development of Irrigation Systems, p. 192.

61 Cohen, “The Politics of Economic Development”, pp. 231, 232.

62 The Nation, 7 Sep. 1996.

63 This paper deals with developments/economic changes up until 1996 and does not attempt to examine the economic repercussions of the recent currency crisis in Thailand.

64 Somsak Tambunlertchai, “Economic Prospects”, p. 89.

65 Far Eastern Economic Review, 19 Oct. 1995, p. 19.

66 The Nation, 7 Sep. 1996.

67 Kosit (1981) cited in Suwan, Manat, Kerdpibule, Udom and Leesuwan, Chukiat, Impacts of Industrialization Upon Villagers' Life in Northern Thailand (Chiang Mai: Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 1992), p. 5Google Scholar.

68 Thai Development Newsletter (1991/92): 19.

69 Asia 1996 Yearbook, p. 218.

70 Thai Development Newsletter (1991/92): 19.

71 Vellas, Francois and Becherel, Lionel, International Tourism (London: Macmillan, 1995), p. 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Cited in Hirsch, Philip “Thai Agriculture: Restructuring in the 1980s and 1990s”, RIAP Occasional Paper No. 12 (Sydney: Research Institute of Asia and the Pacific, 1990), p. 6Google Scholar.

73 Hirsch, “Thai Agriculture”, p. 7.

74 Philip McMichael, “Introduction: Agro-Food System Restructuring — Unity in Diversity”, p. 7, and William H. Friedland, “The Global Fresh Fruit and Vegetable System: An Industrial Organization Analysis”, p. 176, in The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems, ed. Philip McMichael.

75 Friedland, “The Global Fresh Fruit and Vegetable System”, p. 178.

76 Longan, 1996 (Bangkok: Department of Inland Trade, 1996), p. 21Google Scholar.

77 Ibid., pp. 23-25. Export figures for 1996 were not available. However, the 1996 harvest was expected to show an increase of over 65 per cent in excess of that for 1995 which produced a low yield throughout the North due to untimely rains during flowering (p. 1).

78 Ibid., pp. 1-2. These 1996 projections reflect a marked increase in longan in dried form which has been prompted by a very large harvest and facilitated by the granting of subsidized loans for the purchase of longan drying ovens. Low-interest loans of 50,000 baht repayable of five years have been financed by the Department of Trade and Commerce and administered through agricultural cooperatives and local farmers associations.

79 Confirmed through personal communication with the technical officer for the Agricultural Extension Office within the Lamphun Provincial Office.

80 Gray, Jennifer, “The Road to the City: Young Women and Transition in Northern Thailand” (Ph.D. diss., Macquarie University, Sydney, 1990), p. 57Google Scholar.

81 Thangpet, Sophon, “The Impact of Urbanization on Local Resource Management: A Case Study of An Indigenous Irrigation Community in Northern Thailand” (M.A. thesis, Sydney University, 1993), p. 49Google Scholar.

82 Statistics for Wet Rice Cultivation, Chiang Mai Province, 1988/89 to 1992/93 (Chiang Mai: Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, 1994), pp. 1–2Google Scholar.

83 Sophon Thangpet, “The Impact of Urbanization”, Table 11, p. 54.

84 Ritchie, Mark, “From Farmers to Construction Workers: Class Transformation in a Northern Thai Village”, paper presented at The Northwest Regional Consortium for Southeast Asian Studies — Fifth Annual Conference, University of British Columbia, 16-18 Oct. 1992, p. 11Google Scholar.

85 Mark Ritchie, “Transitional Villages: The Breakdown of Rural/Urban Dichotomies in Northern Thailand”, paper presented at the Anthropological Association of America 91st Annual Meeting, 2-6 Dec. 1992, p. 2.

86 Ritchie, “From Farmers to Construction Workers”, p. 19.

87 Charoenmuang, Tanet, “Resource Conflict and Conflict Resolution: The Governance of Water Allocation in Thailand. Four Case Studies from the Upper Northern Region”, Research report prepared for the Thailand Development Research Institute (Chiang Mai: Faculty of Social Science, 1994), pp. 45–46Google Scholar.

88 Tanet, “Resource Conflict and Conflict Resolution”, p. 47.

89 Sophon, “The Impact of Urbanization”, p. 96.

90 The RID only finances the construction of weirs classified as “medium” or “large” scale; almost all communal weirs are classified as “small” scale.

91 This solution to the labour shortage is tenuous. The constituency development budgets were expected to be halved by the government newly constituted in 1995.

92 This term is used by Tanabe in his study of early northern Thai peasant resistance to the Siamese state and influenced theoretically by writers such as Antonio Gramsci and James Scott. See Tanabe, Shigeharu, “Ideological Practice in Peasant Rebellions: Siam at the Turn of the Century”, in History and Pesant Consciousness in Southeast Asia, ed. Turton, Andrew and Tanabe, Shigeharu, Senri Ethnological Studies No. 13 (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1984), p. 79Google Scholar.

93 Tanet, “Resource Conflict and Conflict Resolution”, pp. 9-11, 45—46.

94 Tongdelert, Chatchawan and Lohmann, Lary, “The Muang Faai Irrigation System of Northern Thailand”, The Ecologist 21,2 (1991): 106Google Scholar.