Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:46:59.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of Coping Strategies at Alleviating Cue-Induced Craving: a Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Michelle Dicker ,
Mai Frandsen ,
Matthew A. Palmer  and
Stuart G. Ferguson
Michelle Dicker
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Mai Frandsen
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Matthew A. Palmer
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Stuart G. Ferguson*
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Stuart G. Ferguson, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania Private Bag 26, Hobart, Tasmania 7004, Australia. Email: Stuart.Ferguson@utas.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Results from observational studies suggest that smoking-related cues play a role in triggering relapse. Coping strategies are among the most commonly used cessation strategies, but little is known about how they aid quitting.

Aims: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a suite of selected coping techniques on alleviating cue-induced cravings.

Methods: Thirty-seven daily smokers (Intervention: 20; Control: 17) participated in two laboratory cue-reactivity sessions, separated by approximately one week, during which craving was assessed before and after exposure to smoking-related cues. Following the first session, participants in the Intervention Group were taught a suite of coping strategies. During the second session, participants in the Intervention Group were encouraged to use these strategies.

Results: Participants in the Intervention Group reported a slight decrease in craving following the acute exposure manipulation at the second session, compared to an increase in craving among participants in the Control Group. Intervention Group participants also reported a decrease in craving following prolonged exposure to the smoking cues (compared to an increase in craving among Control Group participants). In both cases, the difference between groups was more pronounced among smokers who responded to the cue-reactivity manipulation. The observed differences were not significant.

Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that coping techniques may be beneficial in alleviating both the initial spike in craving observed following acute cue exposure, and aid recovery during prolonged exposure. These findings need to be replicated in a larger study.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Smoking Cessation , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 173 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., Carey, K. B., Pinto, R. P., & Jacobus, S. I. (1988). Reactivity to smoking cues and relapse: Two studies of discriminant validity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26 (3), 225–233.Google Scholar
Borland, R., Li, L., Driezen, P., Wilson, N., Hammond, D., Thompson, M. E. et al. (2012). Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys. Addiction, 107 (1), 197–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03636.x. Google Scholar
Brandon, T. H., Drobes, D. J., Unrod, M., Heckman, B. W., Oliver, J. A., Roetzheim, R. C. et al. (2011). Varenicline effects on craving, cue reactivity, and smoking reward. Psychopharmacology, 218 (2), 391–403. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2327-z. Google Scholar
Carter, B. L., & Tiffany, S. T. (1999). Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction, 94, 327–340. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x. Google Scholar
Civljak, M., Sheikh, A., Stead, L. F., & Car, J. (2010). Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9), CD007078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub3.Google Scholar
Conklin, C. A., Robin, N., Perkins, K. A., Salkeld, R. P., & McClernon, F. J. (2008). Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: The effects of environments on smokers’ cue-reactivity. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16 (3), 207–214. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.207. Google Scholar
Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3 (1), 7–16. doi: 10.1080/14622200124218. Google Scholar
Curry, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Strategies for coping with temptations to smoke. In Shiffman, S., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.), Coping and substance abuse (pp. 243–265). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Durcan, M. J., De’Ath, J., Targett, D., Marsh, H., Chan, R., & Ong, T. J. (2003). Efficacy of the nicotine lozenge in relieving cue provoked cravings. Presented at the Annual European meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine & Tobacco, Padua, Italy.**Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. G., & Shiffman, S. (2009). The relevance and treatment of cue-induced cravings in tobacco dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 36 (3), 235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.005. Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. G., & Shiffman, S. (2013). Relation of craving and appetitive behavior. In Millier, P. M. (Ed.), Principles of addiction (pp. 473–479). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. G., Shiffman, S., & Gwaltney, C. J. (2006). Does reducing withdrawal severity mediate nicotine patch efficacy? A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74 (6), 1153–1161.Google Scholar
Fiore, M. C., Jaen, C. R., Baker, T. B., Bailey, W. C., Benowitz, N. L., Curry, S. J. et al. (2008). Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update US public health service clinical practice guideline executive summary. Respiratory Care, 53 (9), 1217–1222.Google Scholar
Frandsen, M., Walters, J., & Ferguson, S. G. (2014). Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16 (2), 247–251. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt157. Google Scholar
Franklin, T., Wang, Z., Suh, J. J., Hazan, R., Cruz, J., Li, Y. et al. (2011). Effects of varenicline on smoking cue-triggered neural and craving responses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68 (5), 516–526. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.190. Google Scholar
Jha, P., & Chaloupka, F. J. (Eds.). (1999). Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. Herndon, VA, World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Killen, J. D., & Fortmann, S. P. (1997). Craving is associated with smoking relapse: Findings from three prospective studies. Experimental Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5 (2), 137–142.Google Scholar
Lancaster, T., & Stead, L. F. (2005). Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub2. Google Scholar
Merchant, G., Pulvers, K., Brooks, R. D., & Edwards, J. (2013). Coping with the urge to smoke: A real-time analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 36 (1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Michie, S., Hyder, N., Walia, A., & West, R. (2011). Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 36 (4), 315–319. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.016. Google Scholar
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., & Pedraza, M. (1989). Reactivity to high risk situations and smoking cessation outcome. Journal of Substance Abuse, 1 (4), 393–405.Google Scholar
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Pedraza, M., Monti, P. M., & Rohsenow, D. J. (1992). Smokers’ reactions to interpersonal interaction and presentation of smoking cues. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 557–566.Google Scholar
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Shadel, W. G., Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., & Sirota, A. D. (1999). Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: A controlled clinical trial. Addiction, 94, 685–695.Google Scholar
Niaura, R., Sayette, M., Shiffman, S., Glover, E. D., Nides, M., Shelanski, M. et al. (2005). Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving. Addiction, 100 (11), 1720–1730. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x. Google Scholar
Niaura, R. S., Rohsenow, D. J., Binkoff, J. A., Monti, P. M., Pedraza, M., & Abrams, D. B. (1988). Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97 (2), 133–152. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.97.2.133. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, K. A., Hosein, V. L., & Schwartz, J. E. (2006). Thinking and/or doing as strategies for resisting smoking. Research in Nursing and Health, 29 (6), 533–542.Google Scholar
O’Connell, K. A., & Martin, E. J. (1987). Highly tempting situations associated with abstinence, temporary lapse, and relapse among participants in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 (3), 367–371. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.55.3.367. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayette, M. A., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S. T., Niaura, R. S., Martin, C. S., & Shadel, W. G. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95, S189–210.Google Scholar
Sayette, M. A., & Tiffany, S. T. (2013). Peak provoked craving: An alternative to smoking cue-reactivity, Addiction, 108, 1019–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04013.x. Google Scholar
Shiffman, S. (1982). Relapse following smoking cessation: a situational analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 (1), 71–86.Google Scholar
Shiffman, S. (1984). Coping with temptations to smoke. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52 (2), 261–267.Google Scholar
Shiffman, S. (1993). Smoking cessation treatment: Any progress? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 718–722. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.61.5.718. Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Brockwell, S. E., Pillitteri, J. L., & Gitchell, J. G. (2008). Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (2), 102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.09.005. Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Dunbar, M. S., Kirchner, T. R., Li, X., Tindle, H. A., Anderson, S. J. et al. (2013). Cue reactivity in non-daily smokers: Effects on craving and on smoking behavior. Psychopharmacology, 226 (2), 321–333. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2909-4. Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., Khayrallah, M. A., Jorenby, D. E., Ryan, C. F. et al. (2003). Efficacy of acute administration of nicotine gum in relief of cue-provoked cigarette craving. Psychopharmacology, 166 (4), 343–350. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1338-1. Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. H., McKee, S. A., & George, T. P. (2012). Smoking cue reactivity in adult smokers with and without depression: A pilot study. American Journal of Addiction, 21 (2), 136–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00203.x. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A., & Fiez, J. A. (2012). Quitting-unmotivated and quitting-motivated cigarette smokers exhibit different patterns of cue-elicited brain activation when anticipating an opportunity to smoke. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121 (1), 198–211. doi: 10.1037/a0025112. Google Scholar
Wray, J. M., Gass, J. C., & Tiffany, S. T. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between craving and smoking cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15 (7), 1167–1182. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts268. Google Scholar