Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effectiveness of Coping Strategies at Alleviating Cue-Induced Craving: a Pilot Study

  • Michelle Dicker (a1), Mai Frandsen (a2) (a3), Matthew A. Palmer (a1) and Stuart G. Ferguson (a2) (a4)

Abstract

Introduction: Results from observational studies suggest that smoking-related cues play a role in triggering relapse. Coping strategies are among the most commonly used cessation strategies, but little is known about how they aid quitting.

Aims: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a suite of selected coping techniques on alleviating cue-induced cravings.

Methods: Thirty-seven daily smokers (Intervention: 20; Control: 17) participated in two laboratory cue-reactivity sessions, separated by approximately one week, during which craving was assessed before and after exposure to smoking-related cues. Following the first session, participants in the Intervention Group were taught a suite of coping strategies. During the second session, participants in the Intervention Group were encouraged to use these strategies.

Results: Participants in the Intervention Group reported a slight decrease in craving following the acute exposure manipulation at the second session, compared to an increase in craving among participants in the Control Group. Intervention Group participants also reported a decrease in craving following prolonged exposure to the smoking cues (compared to an increase in craving among Control Group participants). In both cases, the difference between groups was more pronounced among smokers who responded to the cue-reactivity manipulation. The observed differences were not significant.

Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that coping techniques may be beneficial in alleviating both the initial spike in craving observed following acute cue exposure, and aid recovery during prolonged exposure. These findings need to be replicated in a larger study.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Dr. Stuart G. Ferguson, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania Private Bag 26, Hobart, Tasmania 7004, Australia. Email: Stuart.Ferguson@utas.edu.au

References

Hide All
Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., Carey, K. B., Pinto, R. P., & Jacobus, S. I. (1988). Reactivity to smoking cues and relapse: Two studies of discriminant validity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26 (3), 225233.
Borland, R., Li, L., Driezen, P., Wilson, N., Hammond, D., Thompson, M. E. et al. (2012). Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys. Addiction, 107 (1), 197205. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03636.x.
Brandon, T. H., Drobes, D. J., Unrod, M., Heckman, B. W., Oliver, J. A., Roetzheim, R. C. et al. (2011). Varenicline effects on craving, cue reactivity, and smoking reward. Psychopharmacology, 218 (2), 391403. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2327-z.
Carter, B. L., & Tiffany, S. T. (1999). Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction, 94, 327340. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x.
Civljak, M., Sheikh, A., Stead, L. F., & Car, J. (2010). Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9), CD007078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub3.
Conklin, C. A., Robin, N., Perkins, K. A., Salkeld, R. P., & McClernon, F. J. (2008). Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: The effects of environments on smokers’ cue-reactivity. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16 (3), 207214. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.207.
Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3 (1), 716. doi: 10.1080/14622200124218.
Curry, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Strategies for coping with temptations to smoke. In Shiffman, S., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.), Coping and substance abuse (pp. 243265). New York: Academic Press.
Durcan, M. J., De’Ath, J., Targett, D., Marsh, H., Chan, R., & Ong, T. J. (2003). Efficacy of the nicotine lozenge in relieving cue provoked cravings. Presented at the Annual European meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine & Tobacco, Padua, Italy.**
Ferguson, S. G., & Shiffman, S. (2009). The relevance and treatment of cue-induced cravings in tobacco dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 36 (3), 235243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.005.
Ferguson, S. G., & Shiffman, S. (2013). Relation of craving and appetitive behavior. In Millier, P. M. (Ed.), Principles of addiction (pp. 473479). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ferguson, S. G., Shiffman, S., & Gwaltney, C. J. (2006). Does reducing withdrawal severity mediate nicotine patch efficacy? A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74 (6), 11531161.
Fiore, M. C., Jaen, C. R., Baker, T. B., Bailey, W. C., Benowitz, N. L., Curry, S. J. et al. (2008). Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update US public health service clinical practice guideline executive summary. Respiratory Care, 53 (9), 12171222.
Frandsen, M., Walters, J., & Ferguson, S. G. (2014). Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16 (2), 247251. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt157.
Franklin, T., Wang, Z., Suh, J. J., Hazan, R., Cruz, J., Li, Y. et al. (2011). Effects of varenicline on smoking cue-triggered neural and craving responses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68 (5), 516526. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.190.
Jha, P., & Chaloupka, F. J. (Eds.). (1999). Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. Herndon, VA, World Bank Publications.
Killen, J. D., & Fortmann, S. P. (1997). Craving is associated with smoking relapse: Findings from three prospective studies. Experimental Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5 (2), 137142.
Lancaster, T., & Stead, L. F. (2005). Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD001292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001292.pub2.
Merchant, G., Pulvers, K., Brooks, R. D., & Edwards, J. (2013). Coping with the urge to smoke: A real-time analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 36 (1), 315.
Michie, S., Hyder, N., Walia, A., & West, R. (2011). Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors, 36 (4), 315319. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.016.
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., & Pedraza, M. (1989). Reactivity to high risk situations and smoking cessation outcome. Journal of Substance Abuse, 1 (4), 393405.
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Pedraza, M., Monti, P. M., & Rohsenow, D. J. (1992). Smokers’ reactions to interpersonal interaction and presentation of smoking cues. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 557566.
Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Shadel, W. G., Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., & Sirota, A. D. (1999). Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: A controlled clinical trial. Addiction, 94, 685695.
Niaura, R., Sayette, M., Shiffman, S., Glover, E. D., Nides, M., Shelanski, M. et al. (2005). Comparative efficacy of rapid-release nicotine gum versus nicotine polacrilex gum in relieving smoking cue-provoked craving. Addiction, 100 (11), 17201730. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01218.x.
Niaura, R. S., Rohsenow, D. J., Binkoff, J. A., Monti, P. M., Pedraza, M., & Abrams, D. B. (1988). Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97 (2), 133152. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.97.2.133.
O’Connell, K. A., Hosein, V. L., & Schwartz, J. E. (2006). Thinking and/or doing as strategies for resisting smoking. Research in Nursing and Health, 29 (6), 533542.
O’Connell, K. A., & Martin, E. J. (1987). Highly tempting situations associated with abstinence, temporary lapse, and relapse among participants in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 (3), 367371. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.55.3.367.
Sayette, M. A., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S. T., Niaura, R. S., Martin, C. S., & Shadel, W. G. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95, S189210.
Sayette, M. A., & Tiffany, S. T. (2013). Peak provoked craving: An alternative to smoking cue-reactivity, Addiction, 108, 10191025. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04013.x.
Shiffman, S. (1982). Relapse following smoking cessation: a situational analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 (1), 7186.
Shiffman, S. (1984). Coping with temptations to smoke. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52 (2), 261267.
Shiffman, S. (1993). Smoking cessation treatment: Any progress? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 718722. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.61.5.718.
Shiffman, S., Brockwell, S. E., Pillitteri, J. L., & Gitchell, J. G. (2008). Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (2), 102111. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.09.005.
Shiffman, S., Dunbar, M. S., Kirchner, T. R., Li, X., Tindle, H. A., Anderson, S. J. et al. (2013). Cue reactivity in non-daily smokers: Effects on craving and on smoking behavior. Psychopharmacology, 226 (2), 321333. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2909-4.
Shiffman, S., Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., Khayrallah, M. A., Jorenby, D. E., Ryan, C. F. et al. (2003). Efficacy of acute administration of nicotine gum in relief of cue-provoked cigarette craving. Psychopharmacology, 166 (4), 343350. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1338-1.
Weinberger, A. H., McKee, S. A., & George, T. P. (2012). Smoking cue reactivity in adult smokers with and without depression: A pilot study. American Journal of Addiction, 21 (2), 136144. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00203.x.
Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A., & Fiez, J. A. (2012). Quitting-unmotivated and quitting-motivated cigarette smokers exhibit different patterns of cue-elicited brain activation when anticipating an opportunity to smoke. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121 (1), 198211. doi: 10.1037/a0025112.
Wray, J. M., Gass, J. C., & Tiffany, S. T. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between craving and smoking cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15 (7), 11671182. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts268.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed