Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:21:24.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on the Muzzle Blast Flow with Gas-Particle Mixtures Based on Eulerian-Eulerian Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

C.-F. Zhuo ,
W.-J. Yao ,
X.-S. Wu ,
F. Feng  and
P. Xu
C.-F. Zhuo
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, PR China
W.-J. Yao*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, PR China
X.-S. Wu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, PR China
F. Feng
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, PR China
P. Xu
Affiliation:
The Technical Center of Jinxi Industries Group Co.,LtdTaiyuan, PR China
*
*Corresponding author (njust203zcf@126.com)
Get access

Abstract

The issue on the muzzle blast flow with gas-particle mixtures was numerically investigated in this paper. The propellant gas in the cannon was assumed to be gas-particle mixtures consisting of a variety of gaseous species and particles. The model made use of the Eulerian-Eulerican approach, where the particle were modeled as a second fluid with parameters like bulk density, velocity and temperature, interacting with the gas flow. A high-resolution upwind scheme(AUSMPW+) and detailed reaction kinetics model were employed to solve the chemical non-equilibrium Euler equations for gas phase. The Euler equations for particle phase were solved by MacCormack scheme. The particle diameter and the mass fraction of particle were tested to show their effects on the development process of muzzle blast flow with gas-particle mixtures. The distribution of the main flow parameters of both gas and particle were obtained at different time intervals. The results show the evolution of the muzzle blast flow with gas-particle mixtures and demonstrate the effects of key parameter on the flow field of the gas-particle flow. This paper is a significant investigation for understanding the muzzle blast flow with gas-particle mixtures, which can provide valuable reference for the research on the muzzle blast flow.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamicsMuzzle blast flowTwo-phase flowGas-particle mixtures
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 185 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Schmidt, E. M. and Shear, D., “Optical Measurements of Muzzle Blast,” AIAA Journal, 13, pp. 1086–1091 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fansler, K. S. and Schmidt, E. M., “Trajectory Perturbations of Asymmetric Fin-Stabilized Projectiles Caused by Muzzle Blast,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 15, pp. 62–64 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Taylor, T. D. and Lint, T. C., “Numerical Model for Muzzle Blast Flow Fields,” AIAA Journal, 19, pp. 346–349 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Klingenberg, G., “Gun Muzzle Blast and Flash,” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 14, pp. 57–68 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wang, J. C. T. and Widhopf, G. F., “Numerical Simulation of Blast Flow Fields Using a High Resolution TVD Finite Volume Scheme,” Computers & Fluids, 18, pp. 103–137 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Alziary, D. R. T., Cayac, R., Carette, E. and Balbo, P., “Theoretical and Comparison of Unsteady Flow Through a Muzzle Brake,” 13th International Symposium on Ballistics, Stockholm, Sweden (1992).Google Scholar
7.Jiang, Z. L., Takayama, K. and Skews, B. W., “Numerical Study on Blast Flowfields Induced by Supersonic Projectiles Discharged from Shock Tubes,” Physics of Fluids, 10, pp. 277–288 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cler, D. L., Chevaugeon, N., Shephard, M. S. and Remacle, J. F., “CFD Application to Gun Muzzle Blast—A Validation Case Study,” AIAA Paper 2003–1142, U.S.A. (2003).Google Scholar
9.Le, G. G., Ma, D. W. and Feng, Y., “Numerical Simulation of Muzzle Blast Flowfields of Large Caliber Guns,” Acta Armamentarii, 25, pp. 19–22 (2004).Google Scholar
10.Jiang, Z. L., Huang, Y. H. and Takayama, K., “Shocked Flow Induced by Supersonic Projectiles Moving in Tubes,” Computers & Fluids, 33, pp. 953–966 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Jiang, X. H., Fan, B. C. and Li, H. Z., “Numerical Investigation on the Muzzle Flow with Dynamic Mesh Based on ALE Equation,” Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 25, pp. 563–567 (2008).Google Scholar
12.Jiang, X. H., Fan, B. C. and Li, H. Z., “Numerical Investigation on Dynamic Process of Muzzle Flow,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 29, pp. 351–360 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cayzac, R., Carette, E., De Roquefort, T. A., Renard, F. X., Roux, D., Balbo, P. and Patry, J. N., “Computational Fluid Dynamics and Experimental Validation of the Direct Coupling Between Interior, Intermediate and Exterior Ballistics Using the Euler Equations,” Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME, 78, pp. 1–20 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Saito, T., Marumoto, M. and Takayama, K., “Numerical Investigations of Shock Waves in Gas-Particle Mixtures,” Shock Wave, 13, pp. 299–322 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wu, Q. S., Zhu, H. and Xu, Y. H., “Numerical Study of Shock Diffraction in Dusty Gases,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 16, pp. 79–85 (1995).Google Scholar
16.Fedorov, A. V., Kratova, Y. V. and Khmel, T. A., “Shock and Detonation Wave Diffraction at a Sudden Expansion in Gas-Particle Mixtures,” Shock Waves, 18, pp. 281–290 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Doisneau, F., “Eulerian Modeling and Simulation of Polydisperse Moderately Dense Coalescing Spary Flows with Manometric-to-Inertial Droplets: Application to Solid Rocket Motors,” Ph.D. Dissertation, CNRS et Ecole Central Paris, France (2013).Google Scholar
18.Doisneau, F., Laurent, F., Murrone, A., Dupays, J. and Massot, M., “Eulerian Multi-Fluid Models for the Simulation of Dynamics and Coalescence of Particles in Solid Propellant Combustion,” Journal of Computational Physics, 234, pp. 230–262 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Doisneau, F., Sibra, A., Dupays, J., Murrone, A., Laurent, F. and Massot, M., “Numerical Strategy for Unsteady Two-Way Coupling in Polydisperse Sprays: Application to Solid Rocket Motor Instabilities,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 35, pp. 727–748 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Toro, E. F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Heidelberg (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Zhuo, C. F., Wu, X. S. and Feng, F., “Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Non-Equilibrium Flow Using Kinetic Scheme,” Journal of Ballistics, 25, pp. 88–94 (2013).Google Scholar
22.Kim, K. H., Kim, C. and Rho, O. H., “Accurate Computations of Hypersonic Flow Using AUSMPW+ Scheme and Shock-Aligned Grid Technique,” AIAA Paper 98–2442, U.S.A. (1998).Google Scholar
23.Kim, K. H., Kim, C. and Rho, O. H., “Methods for the Accurate Computations of Hypersonic Flow: I. AUSMPW+ Scheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, 174, pp. 38–80 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Zhang, H. X., Chen, J. Q. and Gao, S. C., “Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Non-Equilibrium Flow for H2/O2 Combustion,” Journal of Astronautics, 14, pp. 14–23 (1994).Google Scholar
25.MacCormack, R. W., “The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Cratering,” AIAA Paper 69–354, U.S.A. (1969).Google Scholar
26.Gibeling, H. J. and Nietubicz, C. J., “Navier-Stokes Computations for Reacting, M864 Base Bleed Projectile,” AIAA Paper 93-0504, U.S.A. (1993).Google Scholar