Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:46:12.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An x-ray Fourier line shape analysis in cold-worked hexagonal magnesium base alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. K. Chattopadhyay
Affiliation:
Regional Engineering College, Durgpaur-713209, West Bengal, India
S. K. Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Regional Engineering College, Durgpaur-713209, West Bengal, India
S. P. Sen Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Calcutta-700032, India
Get access

Abstract

Detailed Fourier line shape analyses considering x-ray diffraction profiles from fault unaffected 10.0, 00.2, 11.0, 20.0, 11.2, and 00.4 reflections and fault affected 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 20.1, 20.2, 10.4, and 20.3 reflections have been performed on three magnesium base hexagonal alloys used extensively in the aircraft industry. The first of the three alloys (Mg–Al–Mn, Alloy I) had the nominal composition in wt.% of Al-8.3, Mn-0.35, Si-0.2, Cu-0.12, Fe-0.2, and other 0.01; the second alloy (Mg–Zn–Mn, Alloy II) had the nominal composition in wt.% of Zn-4.0, Mn-0.15, Si-0.01, Cu-0.03, Fe-0.01, Zr-0.70, and rare earth elements-1.50; and the last of the alloys (Mg–Zn–Al, Alloy III) had the nominal composition in wt.% of Zn-4.3, Al-0.15, Mn-0.01, Si-0.03, Cu-0.01, Ni-0.005, Zr-0.6, and rare earth-1.4. The microstructural parameters determined in these analyses indicated the average domain size in alloys I, II, and III as 208 Å, 314 Å, and 400 Å, respectively. The deformation fault densities, α, in these alloy systems (∼54 ⊠ 10−3, 35 ⊠ 10−3, and 28 ⊠ 10−3, respectively, in alloys I, II, and III) were found to be appreciably high compared to the earlier work on pure magnesium (0.63 ⊠ 10−3). The deformation twin fault density, β, which was found to be negligible in pure magnesium (∼0.21 ⊠ 10−3), was found to be negative here, also indicating the negligible presence of twin faults in these alloys. These results establish that on cold work the solutes introduce deformation stacking faults in an appreciable quantity in magnesium which is not normally susceptible to faulting when in pure form. Of these three alloys, however, Alloy I (Mg–Al–Mn) was found to be the most prone to deformation faulting.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Adler, R. P. I. and Wagner, C. N. J., J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3451 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cohen, J. B. and Wagner, C. N. J., J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2073 (1962).Google Scholar
3Chatterjee, S. K., Trans. Indian Inst. of Metals 33, 72 (1982).Google Scholar
4Chatterjee, S. K., Haider, S. K., and Gupta, S. P. Sen, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 411 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Chatterjee, S. K., Haider, S. K., and Gupta, S. P. Sen, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1442 (1977).Google Scholar
6De, M. and Gupta, S. P. Sen, Pramana 23, 721 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Chattopadhyay, S. K., Chatterjee, S. K., and Gupta, S. P. Sen, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22, 142 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Chatterjee, S. K. and Gupta, S. P. Sen, J. Mater. Sci. 9, 953 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Chatterjee, S. K. and Gupta, S. P. Sen, J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1093 (1975).Google Scholar
10Lele, S. and Anantharaman, T. R., Phys. Status Solidi 5, K121 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Lele, S. and Anantharaman, T. R., Z. Metallic. 58, 37 (1967).Google Scholar
12Gupta, R. K., Rao, P. Rama, and Anantharaman, T. R., Z. Metallk. 63, 575 (1972).Google Scholar
13Stokes, A. R., Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 61, 382 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969).Google Scholar
15Hull, D., Introduction to Dislocation (Pergamon Press, London, 1968), Chap. 5, 6.Google Scholar
16Akhter, A. and Teghtsoonian, E., Acta Metall. 19, 655 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Akhter, A., Acta Metall. 21, 1 (1973).Google Scholar