Measuring discrepancy

At the present site, net radiation was measured directly with a single net radiometer (N R_m) and also calculated (N R_c) as the sum of shortwave and longwave radiative fluxes which were individually measured. In Figure 2 the difference between N R_c and N R_m(ΔN R) is plotted against global radiation. The circles represent hourly mean values (1909 cases) for the summer months of 1990. The comparison shows a significant underestimation of net radiation measured by the Funk-type net radiometer. Reference Müller and OhmuraMüller and Ohmura (1993) showed a similar characteristic for measurements made at Payerne (Switzerland) with the same type of instrument. They reasoned that, when the sensor surface is heated by solar radiation (i.e. the net-radiometer output is positive), the net radiometer loses a part of the absorbed radiation to thermal convection which develops between the sensor surface and the polyethylene dome. The best fit between the underestimation of net radiation and global radiation can be obtained using a function described by the followin:

with a = 0.00125 and b = 1.6297. The comparison between ΕΤΗ Camp and Payeme indicates that the amounts of ΔN R are similar during the summer season for a mid-latitude station and a station on the Greenland sheet. It is a matter for further investigation whether this conclusion can be treated as generally valid or whether there is a dependence on the type of instrument used in both studies As shown by Reference Halldin and LindrothHalldin and Lindroth (1992), a large variation can be expected by comparing different types of net radiometer. In the present work, the calculated net radiation, i.e. the sum of the individual components, is used.

Fig. 2. Relationship between the difference in net radiation (NR_C-NR_m) and global radiation based on hourly mean values of summer months 1990. N R_c is calculated as the sum of shortwave net and longwave net radiation. N R_m is measured directly. The curve represents the optimal fit of Equation (4) to the points shown in the figure.

Cloud conditions

As cloud conditions strongly influence radiative fluxes at the surface, the cloud observation n presented first. Because of the individual differences in the estimation and the interpretation of cloud amount and types, systematic errors in the observations are unavoidable (e.g. Reference Warren, Hahn and LondonWarren and others, 1985). The quality of data for low cloud is better than for middle and high clouds, because the observations were made at ground level and so the recording of middle and high clouds was affected by the amount and frequency of low cloud.

The monthly and seasonal mean values of total, low-, middle- and high-cloud amounts are presented in Table 1. The seasonal trend shows a mean coverage of 50% in May, June and July, and a strong increase in August. A large year-to-year difference occurs for June, during which a 10 d period with diminished cloud amount was responsible for the smaller value in June 1990 compared to June 1991. The large total-cloud amount in August is due to a strong increase in low-cloud amount The amount of middle cloud was balanced during the summer months and the amount of high cloud decreased slightly in August. For the seasonal mean (June, July, August), nearly half of the total-cloud amount was due to low cloud and the other half resulted from equal amounts of middle and high cloud. Total-cloud amounts show no significant diurnal cycle and the values are in the range 55–58%. On each level one cloud type is dominant. Half of the low cloud is due to stratus, while 70% of the middle and high clouds are altocumulus translucidus and cirrus, respectively.

The seasonal frequency distribution of the total-cloud amount is given in Figure 3. Because of the way that 1/8 and 7/8 are defined, for interpretation purposes 0/8 and 1/8 are considered as one group (clear sky), and 7/8 and 8/8 as another group (overcast sky). Generally, the frequency distribution shows a bimodal feature with large values for clear- and overcast-sky conditions and small values for the partially cloud-covered conditions. The frequency of total-cloudless observations is large in May and June and decreases strongly in July and August. The overcast-sky condition in August (60%) is three times more than the cloud-free condition (20%). On average, the frequency of clear and overcast sky together applies to nearly three-quarters of all the cases, with 30% and 42%, respectively.

Fig. 3. Seasonal frequency distribution of the total-cloud amount fer the summer months (June, July, August: JJA) in 1990 and 1991 at ΕΤΗ Camp.

The distribution of low, middle and high clouds against total-cloud amount shows that high clouds are predominant for 1/8 to 5/8 total-cloud amount conditions. For 6/8 and 7/8, the sky is covered mainly by middle clouds, while most of the 8/8 cases are caused by low clouds. The increase of 8/8 m August is mainly due to low clouds. The frequency of cumulus decreases with increasing low-cloud amount. Stratocumulus shows small values for clear- and overcast-sky condition, while more than 80% of 8/8 is due to stratus. Therefore, the main reason for the increase in low-cloud amount in August is the increase in frequency of stratus This increase in the appearance of stratus affects not only the amount of low cloud but also the total-cloud amount.

Shortwave fluxes

Based on 3069 half-hourly values, an average difference in direct solar radiation (Q_m - Q) of −2.6 × 7.2 W m⁻² was found. The difference is smaller than the uncertainties of the calibration coefficients of the instruments. Therefore, the quality of Q is considered as good and the calculated values will be used in the sections which follow to compare data sets from 1990 and 1991.

The monthly mean diurnal cycles are given in Figure 4. Due to a very sunny period in the second half of June 1990, Q shows extremely high values. Compared with 1990, no extended period of large Q was found in 1991, but there were two periods, the second half of June and the second half of August, with small values of Q caused by a large total-cloud amount (Table 1). This leads to monthly mean diurnal cycles which show the largest values for July and much smaller values for June and August compared to 1990.

Fig. 4. Mean diurnal cycles of direct solar, diffuse sky and global radiation each for June, July and August 1990 and 1991 at ΕΤΗ Camp.

The atmospheric extinction of Q shows seasonal trends. The intensity of Q in 1991 shows highest values for May and lower values for June, August and July. The variation range of the normal incident direct solar radiation is relatively small and amounts to 120 W m⁻². Reference AmbachAmbach (1963) showed a smilar maximum value for measurements in June and July 1959 at Camp IV, and Reference Arnbach and MarklArnbach and Markl (1983) gave a value of 114 Wm ⁻² at 70° of zenith angle for Carrefour (Fig. 1). It seems that the intensity of Q under clear-sky conditions shows little scatter on the Greenland ice sheet. The transparency of the atmosphere was investigated with respect to the transmission coefficient for clear-sky conditions. The transmission coefficient calculated for different mouths varies between 0.814 and 0.836, by which the year-to-year variation is greater than the variation during the summer months.

Under overcast and partly cloudy conditions, Q is affected by absorption and scattering due to cloud droplets. The attenuation of Q in the presence of clouds is an important factor for the shortwave net radiation at the surface. The daily mean direct solar radiation is analysed with respect to daily mean total-cloud amount and is presented in Figure 5. To eliminate the effect of solar elevation, Q was normalized by the extraterrestrial solar radiation (I). The daily direct solar radiation is about 70% of daily extraterrestrial solar radiation under clear-sky condition and decreases slightly to a total-cloud amount of 3/8, For up to 3/8 total-cloud amount, the frequency of high clouds is large, while the frequency of middle and low clouds increases strongly from 5/8 to 8/8 of total-cloud amount. This leads to large transmissivity under less-covered sky and to low transmissivity for larger total-cloud amounts.

Fig. 5. Relationship between daily total-cloud amount and daily mean values of the radiative fluxes for June-August 1990 and May-August 1991 at ΕΤΗ Camp. Units: W m ⁻² and ratio for albedo, Q/I, q/GL and GL/I.

The monthly mean diurnal cycles of diffuse sky radiation in 1990 show the largest amplitude for July (Rg. 4). The mean diurnal amplitude for June shows smaller values for high solar elevations compared to August. This fact results in similar monthly mean values as shown in Table 2. Under clear-sky conditions, q depends mainly on the scattering of aerosols and molecules, the absorption in the atmosphere and on the albedo of the surface Observations in 1991 show a strong decrease in diffuse sky radiation with increasing zenith angle and a seasonal dependency. The values of q decrease from May to July and increase slightly in August. This difference is probably caused by the atmospheric and surface conditions as mentioned earlier. The precipitable water vapour in the atmosphere (W) is small and increases from 2.9 kg m ⁻² in May to 6.0 kg m⁻² in August. Reference HolmgrenHolmgren (1971) gave values between 3.0 and 7.0 kg m ⁻² for the same period at Ice Cap Station on Devon Island in the Canadian Arctic. Because of this variation of W, the variation of q under conditions due to water vapour is considered to be small. The attenuating effect of aerosols can be expressed by Ångström’s turbidity coefficient. To characterize the turbidity of the air at the study site, measurements performed by Reference AmbachAmbach (1963) in June and July 1959 are taken into account. Ångström’s turbidity coefficients, adjusted to station height, show daily mean values between 0.010 and 0.027 After Reference LiljequistLiljequist (1956) and Reference HolmgrenHolmgren (1971), this variation of the turbidity coefficient corresponds to a variation in q of 11 W m⁻² at 50° zenith angle. At the present study site, the variation of q at 50° zenith angle is three times larger. It seems that the surface albedo and the diurnal amplitude of global radiation are mainly responsible for the variation of q under clear-sky conditions.

Under overcast-sky and partly cloud-covered sky conditions, q is contributed to by reflections and diffuse refraction at cloud droplets. The ratio of daily mean diffuse-sky radiation and global radiation (q/GL) is given in Figure 5. The amount of q is steady from 0/8 to 3/8 total-cloud amount, increases up to 8/8 and shows a maximum at 7/8. The large variation of q between 7/8 and 8/8 is mainly due to the season, while the strong scattering of points between 3/8 and 7/8 depends on cloud types and on albedo of the lower side of the clouds. The relation q/GL is 0.5 at a total-cloud amount of about 2/3.

During the summer months, global radiation is composed of 60% direct solar and 40% diffuse-sky radiation. Direct solar and diffuse-sky radiation show large variations (monthly mean values) from year to year, while global and shortwave reflected radiation vary less (Table 2). The decrease in Q due to increasing cloud amount is partly compensated for by q. The percentage of compensation increases not only because of larger total-cloud amount but also due to high surface albedo and changing cloud distributions. The frequency of low clouds increases with increasing total-cloud amount, of which the stratus-cloud type is the most dominant. The effect of daily total-cloud amount on the daily ratio GL/I is given in Figure 5. The effect of latitude and declination is eliminated in GL/I. The increase of scattering for the increasing total-cloud amount depends on cloud types and the daily course of cloudiness. That means, for instance, a strong increase of total-cloud amount in the early afternoon, which leads to an underestimation of GL and GL/I compared to total-cloud amount. The influence of total-cloud amount and cloud types leads to a variation in GL/I from 61 to 74%, with an average of about 70% for the summer months (Table 2) Thus, for parameterization of GL, it is advisable to take cloud types (especially for low clouds) into account if high-quality cloud data are available. The seasonal global radiation is 4% smaller in 1991 than in 1990 and the lack of Q in 1991 is almost compensated for by q.

Shortwave reflected radiation depends on GL and the reflectivity (albedo) of the surface. At the present site, αGL was measured at ground level (standard height) and from the tower (27 m height) in order to represent a larger observation area. The influences of the aluminium tower and the camp on measurements are minimal (< 0.5%) and will be neglected. Albedo is composed of a diffuse and a specular component. It is influenced mainly by the properties of the surface, the solar elevation and the cloud conditions, and shows a spectral dependency for snow and ice (Reference WarrenWarren, 1982). During the field seasons, surface conditions changed from wet snow to bare ice and fresh snow in 1990 and from dry snow to wet snow, saturated snow, slush and fresh snow in 1991 Due to these surface properties, the variation of the daily mean albedo ranged from 0.50 to 0.89 in 1990 and from 0.66 to 0.92 in 1991, respectively The mean seasonal albedo is centred about 0.75 (Table 2). The monthly diurnal cycles of albedo show small ranges (2–7%) with a slight increase from morning to afternoon (Fig. 6). Because of small amounts of shortwave radiative fluxes and the lower accuracy of global radiation measurements for a large zenith angle (Z), the diurnal cycle of albedo is only considered for Ζ < 70°. During both years, daily mean albedo at ground level and from the tower show similar values for June and July. For August 1990–91 and May 1991, daily mean albedo values from the tower are up to 6% lower. This indicates the influence of surface topography (sastruga) and solar elevation on shortwave reflected radiation from areas with different sizes. For remote-sensing applications, shortwave reflected radiation measurements from the high tower for pre- and post-melt seasons are more meaningful in order to prevent the influence of the various factors mentioned above. Because of the high albedo, shortwave reflected radiation is greater in 1991, although global radiation is smaller.

Fig. 6. Mean diurnal cycles of shortwave (SW) reflected radiation, albedo at ground level and shortwave net radiation, each for June, July and August 1990 and 1991 at ΕΤΗ Camp.

Under clear-sky conditions, the features of the diurnal cycle show a wide variation. Five diurnal cycles for clear-sky conditions in 1991 are shown in Figure 7. The range is generally very small (3–8%). Except for 14 May (dry snow), measurements were made above wet snow, the saturated snow layer or slush. To eliminate uncertainties of the up-facing pyranometer under a lower solar elevation, the diurnal cycle of albedo was calculated with respect to the sum of Q _m and q using the 1991 data (Fig. 8). The nature of the curves is similar. Therefore, no influence of GL measured by pyranometer on albedo can be demonstrated conclusively. In the same figure, the diurnal cycle of albedo From the tower is given. During the day, albedo at the tower is a little smaller or equal to the albedo at ground level but it increases strongly after 1630 h LST. This higher reflectivity in the afternoon for a large area under clear-sky conditions indicates a slight increase in actual global radiation received on the slope of the surface, which falls gently to the west.

Fig. 7. Diurnal cycles of albedo at ground level under clear-sky conditions for different days in 1991. Only values of zenith angle less than 70° are considered.

Fig. 8. Diurnal cycles of albedo at ground level, from the tower and at ground level (calculated as the sum of Q _m and q) under clear-sky conditions for 15 June 1991. Notice the different scales of the axis than given in Figure 7.

Two main groups must be distinguished for the effect of total-cloud amount on daily mean albedo (Fig. 5): (1) dry snow and (2) wet snow. The first group shows a daily mean of 0.85 up to a total-cloud amount of 5/8 and Increases slightly to about 0.91 for 8/8. The second group shows values between 0.70 and 0.77 up to 5/8 and an increase of 5% up to 8/8 total-cloud amount. Daily mean values of albedo of less than 0.65 are obtained above ice surfaces and show no dependency on total-cloud amount. The higher reflectivity of the snow cover under overcast conditions in comparison with clear-sky conditions is mainly due to alteration of the spectral intensity of GL by increasing amounts of water droplets and water vapour.

The monthly mean diurnal cycles of shortwave net radiation (SW_net) for June and July 1990 show similar amplitudes which indicates that the much larger GL in June is compensated for by the lower albedo in July (Fig. 6). In 1991, the seasonal mean reaches 78% of the amount from 1990 which is due to smaller GL and higher albedo in 1991. The effect of total-cloud amount on daily shortwave net radiation is shown in Figure 5. As for the albedo, two groups are distinguished for dry- and wet-snow conditions. For dry snow, SW _net, is around 55 W m⁻² up to 5/8, which corresponds to half the amount found for wet-snow conditions. From 5/8 to 8/8, SW_net decreases by 50%. For wet snow, SW_net decreases slightly from 0/8 to 4/8 and drops by about 50% to 8/8 total-cloud amount.

Longwave fluxes

The longwave incoming radiation derived from instruments was compared with the values calculated using LOWTRAN7, a band model (Reference KneizysKneizys and others, 1988), given in Reference Konzelmann, van de Wal, Greuell, Bintanja, Henneken and Abe-OuchiKonzelmann and others (1994). For clear-sky conditions, measurements are on average larger than LOWTRAN7 calculations by 10 ± 4 W m⁻². However, differences between measurements and calculations are to be viewed with caution because of the uncertainties of both methods. Calculations with LOWTRAN7 are useful for checking instantaneous measurements of L _i under clear-sky conditions. Especially due to the frequent cloud covers and complexities caused by them, continuous measurements cannot be replaced by computations.

L _i, shows monthly mean diurnal cycles with small variations (Fig. 9). Different features in July and August 1990 can be explained by the varying frequency of occurrence of low, middle and high clouds, and altering diurnal cycles of cloudiness. In 1991, values for June show a larger amplitude and two peaks, one in the morning and the other in the late afternoon. This is probably due to a larger cloud amount. The monthly mean values for 1991 are more balanced compared to 1990 and the seasonal mean is 4% larger than in 1990 (Table 2). The monthly total-cloud amount for the summer months (Table 1) is in good agreement with the monthly longwave incoming radiation but L _i does not always correspond to the monthly mean diurnal cycles as suggested by the screen-level temperature (Reference OhmuraOhmura and others, 1992b, p. 19). It seems that L _i has a better correlation with cloud conditions than with air temperature. The variations in daily cloud conditions (amount and type) should be taken into account by calculating L _i with numerical models. For a total-cloud amount of up to 3/8, the L _i is centred around 230 W m⁻² (Fig. 5). From 3/8 to overcast conditions, L _i increases strongly and shows values close to 300 W m⁻² at 8/8 total-cloud amount.

Fig. 9. Mean diurnal cycles of longwave (LW) incoming radiation, longwave outgoing radiation, longwave net radiation and net radiation, each for June, July and August 1990 and 1991 at ΕΤΗ Camp.

Snow and ice surfaces in a melting condition were predominant at the study site. The steady temperature of 0°C offered an opportunity to check the measurements, as it is done for absolute calibration over an ice-water surface. outgoing radiation shows generally very smooth cycles with small amplitudes. The mean diurnal cycle for 1990 (Fig. 9) shows the largest amplitude (15 W m with a minimum at 0600 h LST and a maximum at 1800 h LST. These correspond to a time lag of 1 h compared to the mean diurnal variation of air temperature at screen level, with air temperature ahead of the phase. In June 1991, the mean diurnal cycle is similar to July and more dampened compared to June 1990, because of the smaller amplitude of the air temperature. The month-to-month variation is larger in 1991 than lit 1990 but the seasonal mean is the same (Table 2). Except for the pre-melt season, there is no conclusive evidence that cloud conditions influence L _o(Fig. 5).

Based on half-hourly values for the period May-August 1991, the surface temperature was calculated from. This period was chosen because of the larger range of values and more accurate screen-level air-temperature measurements due to ventilation. The difference between screen-level air temperature and thermal radiation from the surface varies for individual months. May shows the largest temperature difference (2.89 ± 1.47°C) which is due to a strong increase in air temperature in the second half of the month and to the cooling of the snow surface by the underlying cold snow layers. June and August show much smaller temperature differences, 1.44±1.09 and 1.44±1.08°C, respectively. For both months, the monthly mean air temperature is below 0°C and the surface (snow or slush) is melting. The significantly larger value for July (1.77±1.03°C) is caused by a much higher air temperature. Daily mean longwave outgoing rad-can be parameterized by using the screen-level air temperature. Based on daily mean values from Summit (Fig. 1) and ΕΤΗ Camp, the relationship between L _o and screen-level temperature (T_a) was calculated. The linear regression shows a correlation coefficient of 0.983. For T_a<1.7°C, L _oan be expressed as

by which L_o is given in W m ⁻² and T_a in °C. A value of 316 W m⁻² for L _o. (melting surface) can be expected for Observations from the pre- to post-melt seasons indicate that the temperature gradient near the surface increases for higher altitudes at the same time.

Because of the lower atmospheric temperature compared to the surface temperature, longwave net radiation (LW _net) is mostly negative during the summer months, indicating the energy loss at the surface. Due to the steady values of during the melt season, LW _net is strongly characterized by L _i. Therefore, LW _net depends mainly on total-cloud amount and cloud types. During the pre-melt season L _i is smaller compared to the melting season, while L _o(due to the low snow temperature) is much smaller This leads to an amount of LW_net which is larger compared to the melting season. The largest amounts of LW _net can be expected during the post-melt season due to greater L _i. (cloud conditions) and minimal L₀ (temperature at the surface <0°C).

The mean diurnal cycle of LW _net for June 1990 shows a decrease in the late afternoon because of L _o (Fig. 9). The monthly mean longwave net radiation increases from June to August because of increasing total-cloud amount and a smaller amount of L _o in August (Table 2). In 1991, the features of monthly mean diurnal cycles are similar to those of L,. Because of the smaller L _o in August, the level of the diurnal cycle of LW _net is larger. July shows the smallest monthly mean value, while the value for August is much larger. This is caused by the higher total-cloud amount and the lower surface temperature in August. For a total-cloud amount of up to 3/8, the daily mean longwave net radiation is centred around −70 W m⁻² (Fig. 5) and increases strongly for overcast conditions (−lO W m⁻²).

Radiation balance

The possible underestimation of net radiation, mentioned earlier, leads to a large relative error at locations with high surface reflectivities. During the main melt period (June, July) at ETH Camp, the differences between net radiation derived by the two different methods, in terms of melt rate, corresponds to about 350 mm w..e. This amount of difference cannot be ignored, as it is equivalent to the mean annual accumulation of Greenland (Reference Ohmura and ReehOhmura and Reeh, 1991).

At the present site near the mean ELA, an energy gain at the surface due to radiative fluxes can he expected from late May to mid-August, while during the pre-melt season (in May) the amount of net radiation is centred around zero W m⁻². The monthly mean diurnal cycles for 1990 (Fig. 9) show the highest values for July during the daytime and the highest values for August during the “night-time”. These features indicate that net radiation depends mainly on declination (global radiation), reflectivity of the surface and cloud conditions. The monthly mean net radiation increases from June to July by 50% and decreases strongly in August but it retains a positive value. In July 1991, the largest net radiation values are found during the daytime and the smallest values are found during the “night”, while the situation for August is reversed The monthly mean net radiation is below zero W m ⁻² in May (Table 2), peaks at a similar amount for June and July, and decreases to a value close to zero W m⁻² in August. Net radiation in June 1990 and June 1991 are similar. This indicates that the smaller amount of SW _net in 1991 (because of a lack of GL) is compensated for by the increase in total-cloud amount. The smaller amount of net radiation in July 1991 is mainly due to the higher albedo in 1991. In August 1991, the smaller SW _net (because of the higher albedo) is almost compensated for by the larger cloud amount and lower surface temperature. The seasonal mean net radiation is more than 20% smaller in 1991 than in 1990 and shows an absolute difference of 6 W m⁻². The larger value for 1990 can he explained by the greater amount of GL and lower albedo in 1990, which could not be completely compensated for by the greater cloud amount in 1991.

The effect of total-cloud amount on dally mean net radiation is shown in Figure 5. To eliminate the effect of declination and alhedo, net radiation is analysed separately for May (dry snow), June-July (wet snow) and August (dry snow). The decrease of SW _net due to increasing cloud amount is compensated for by an increase in LW _net for dry-snow conditions in May. The mean albedo for May is high (85%) and the distribution of low, middle and high cloud amounts is uniform (Table In June-July, daily mean albedo shows values between 50 and 91% with an average of 74%. Daily net radiation increases very slightly but it is not significant, at a rate of <0.8 W m ⁻² with a 1/8 increase of cloud amount This indicates that LW _net is able to compensate for the decrease of SW _net, due to increasing cloud amount. For dry-snow conditions in August, daily mean albedo is mostly between 75 and 90% with an average of 84%. Daily net radiation shows a weak trend toward increase from clear-sky to overcast-sky conditions. The difference between May and August could be due to different cloud schemes which show much more low cloud of the stratus type in August than in May. For dry-snow conditions at Carrefour, Reference AmbachAmbach (1974) showed an increase in net radiation of about 23 W m⁻² from 0/8 to 8/8, while at ΕΤΗ Camp the values of net radiation are more or less steady. At Camp IV, Arnbach (1977) observed an increase in net radiation of about 27 W m⁻² from clear-sky to overcast conditions for days with an albedo > 70%. This relation, in which net radiation increases with increasing cloud amount for an albedo > 75% (Arnbach, 1974), could not he found in the same order of magnitude at the present study site. This discrepancy could be caused by a possible underestimation of net radiation (see above) measured by using the unshaded method or by different cloud schemes (types) at the various locations.

Comparison with other locations

To put the measurements of radiative fluxes at ETH Camp in a larger perspective, a comparison with results from other locations (Fig. 1) on the Greenland ice sheet is made. As a contribution to the Greenland Icecore Project (GRIP), a European Scientific Foundation programme with eight nations collaborating to drill through the central Greenland ice sheet, radiative-flux measurements and synoptic observations were made at Summit (personal communication from A. Abe-Ouchi). The earlier works are converted to WRR (Reference Fröhlich and LondonFröhlich and London, 1986). Since Reference AmbachAmbach (1963, Reference Ambach1977), at Camp IV, and Ambach and Markl (1983), at Carrefour, used a value for Stefan-Boltzmann’s constant that was 1.25% larger than the currently accepted value (= 5.67 × 10 W m⁻² Κ⁻⁴), their longwave radiative-flux measurements were divided by a factor of 1.0125. In addition, it must be mentioned that ΕΤΗ Camp was the only location where longwave incoming, longwave net and net radiation were obtained with shaded radiometers. Therefore, a systematic difference due to the different methods of measurement cannot he excluded.

Cloud observations from other locations on the Greenland ice sheet are very rare. At Summit, the total-cloud amount in June 1991 was a little larger than at ΕΤΗ Camp but the values are based on only three observations a day. E.A.C. Henneken (personal communication) has given a value of sky covered by clouds of 49% for July 1991 at Gimex-FUA, an ice-sheet station which is slightly larger than at ETH Camp AtGimex-IMAU (Reference Oerlemans and VugtsOerlemans and Vugts, 1993), a station dose to the ice margin, the trend for June and July 1991 Η similar but the amount is a little less than given m this study. The observations at various locations show a slight increase in total-cloud cover from coast to summit for June 1991 (Gimex-IMAU: 58%; ΕΤΗ Camp: 60%; Summit: 65%) and the same trend for July 1991 (Gimex-IMAU 41%; ΕΤΗ Camp: 46%; Gimex-FUA. 50%). The results from various locations are close to each other and the uncertainty is large because of a small data base and different observers, observing intervals, locations and time-scales. Therefore, no definite conclusion about the geographical distribution of the total-cloud amount on the Greenland ice sheet can he provided hut the observations are helpful to interpret radiative fluxes.

Global radiation a the most commonly measured component of the radiation balance. GL/I and the ratio of minimum and maximal GL are considered for comparing daily mean values for various study sites (Fig. 1; Table 3). Values are given for June and July but they are based on measurements for different years and numbers of days. The ratio GL_min/GL_max increases with increasing elevation and shows a much higher value at Summit (3230 m a.s.l.) than at Gimex-IMAU at the ice margin. The range of variation of GL/I is small at Summit and increases with decreasing elevation, while the averages of the ratio GL/I show no significant trend This feature can he explained by the existence of low clouds (especially of the stratus type) close to the ice margin.

Generally, GL increases from 60° to 70°N, remains steady further to the north and increases from the ice margin to the ice sheet. In June, GL at the ice margin increases from the south to the Arctic Circle from about 200 W m⁻² at Nordbogletscher to about 260 W m⁻² at Qamanârssûp (Reference Braithwaite and OlesenBraithwaite and Olesen, 1985) and at Gimex-IMAU. Around 70° N, the amount of GL is 330–360 W m ², The year-to-year variation for June was large at ΕΤΗ Camp with 381 W m⁻² in 1990 and 337 W m ⁻² in 1991. The value for 1991 accords with simultaneous measurements at Summit which show 357 W m ⁻², The value obtained at Carrefour (362 W m⁻²; 1850 m a. s. l.) appears reasonable considering the variability of GL observed in June at ΕΤΗ Camp. At the Gimex transect (around 67°N) GL is 283 W m⁻² in July at the ice margin and 320 W m⁻² at the ELA. This value is the same as the observation at ETH Camp in the same year. Measurements at Camp IV show smaller values of GL for June and July compared to the very close ETH Camp site, where total-cloud amount for June is smaller in 1990 and greater in 1991. In July, total-clod amount is smaller in both years at ETH Camp but GL is much larger at ETH Camp (316 W m⁻²) than at Camp IV (279 W m⁻²) Comparing the results from various locations close to the ELA, the amount of GL observed at Camp IV seems to be at the lower limit. Therefore, an amount between 320 and 360 Wm⁻² can be expected for June and July in the accumulation area between 67° and 72°Ν Further north, GL decreases slightly in July to about 320 W m ⁻² considering site II (Reference Diamond and GerdelDiamond and Gerdel, 1958) and Christian Land (KCL) in eastern north Greenland (Reference Konzelmann and BraithwaiteKonzelmann and Braithwaite, 1995). Measurements of GL in August are fairly rare. The year-to-year variation at ETH Camp is slight and the amount of global radiation (about 200 W m ⁻²) is similar to the observations at the Ice Cap Station on Devon Island.

Albedo values for various study sites are given in Table 4. For June and July, the albedo seems steady at the lower ablation area (Gimex-IMAU; 341 m a. s. l.), while the albedo decreases strongly in the upper ablation area (Camp IV; 1004 m a.s.l.) during the same months. Near the ELA (ETH Camp), the albedo is much higher in June and increases at Carrefour and Summit. From June to July, the albedo decreases more at Camp IV than at ETH Camp and at Carrefour. Around the Arctic Circle and near the ELA (Gimex-FUA; Reference Henneken, Bink, Vugts, Cannemeijer and MeestersHenneken and others, 1994), the albedo is similar to the observations at ETH Camp. In the dry-snow zone (site II; 2128 m a. s. l.), the albedo is larger than at Carrefour which is located in the percolation zone. For August, only measurements at ETH Camp are available, which show larger values compared to June and July due to the beginning of the accumulation season. It is obvious that the beginning d the accumulation season in mid-August will be responsible for increasing the albedo much more in the ablation than in the accumulation area Measurements near the ELA on the ice cap of Devon Island show a seasonal trend similar to that obtained at ETH Camp but with a time lag of 1 month. At ETH Camp, the albedo decreases by 0.14 from May to July and increases strongly in August, whereas at Ice Cap Station there is also a drop of albedo from June to July and an increase in August. In general, the albedo for June and July is lower than 0.60 in the ablation area, a drop to 0.70–0.75 around the ELA (because of the longer duration of the snow cover), reaches 0.80–0.85 in the percolation zone and 0.85–0.90 in the dry-snow zone. According to Reference HolmgrenHolmgren (1971), the albedo at the ELA far north is a little higher (0.01–0.03) in May, July and August, hut much higher (0.10) in June compared to ETH Camp. Albedo observed in July at the ELA increases from Gimex-FUA to ETH Camp and to Ice Cap Station.

Measurements of longwave radiative fluxes are very rare and were made only at Camp IV, Carrefour, Summit and ETH Camp. LW _net is treated as residual (LW_net = NR - SW_net) at Gimex-FUA and site II. In the percolation and dry-snow zone, LW _net is between −33 and −45 W m ⁻² in June and July. At Camp IV, LW _net is in the same range, while the values at ETH Camp are about −55 W m ⁻². If L _o at Camp IV were recalculated using Equation 4, the value of LW _net would decrease by 7 W m⁻² and the discrepancy in the LW_net would diminish greatly. LW _net obtained originally at Gimex-FUA (−72 W m⁻²) is 20 W m⁻² smaller than at ETH Camp. Applying the correction for the possible underestimation of measured net radiation developed at ETH Camp (Equation 4), LW_net shows −57 W m⁻² at Gimex-FUA With these assumptions, the likely values of LW_net for the three stations near the ELA came closer to each other It seems that LW_net is larger in the upper accumulation area due to a smaller difference between atmospheric and surface temperature. At the ELA and m the ablation area, L_o is larger compared to L_i . Closer to the coast, L_o is affected by low clouds which influence the amount of LW_net more than higher up on the ice sheet. Therefore, LW_net depends mainly on the variauon of and on low-cloud conditions.

A comparison of ween-level temperature and surface temperature measured by radiometers a given in Table 5 for Summit, Carrefour, Camp IV and ETH Camp. The temperature gradient in May is much larger at Carrefour than at ETH Camp, which could be explained by the lower temperature of the interior snow cover. Similar values for June and July at Carrefour were observed in May and June at ETH Camp. This indicates a time lag of approximately 1 month for Carrefour compared to the present site. At Summit, the temperature is much lower for the measuring period but the temperature gradient between the surface and screen-level height is similar to at Carrefour. Values for July at Camp IV are in the same order as at ETH Camp, whereas the temperature gradient for June is much larger. Monthly mean air temperatures are similar and the discrepancy is caused by the much lower surface temperature. No reasonable explanation could be found for this fact.

As in the case of longwave radiative fluxes, measurements of net radiation are rare in space and time for the Greenland ice sheet. The amount of net radiation decreases Gem the ice margin to the accumulation area and shows its largest values m July. The decrease of net radiation from the ELA to the upper accumulation area is much smaller than from the ablation area to the ELA. A profile of net radiation from went to east at 70°Ν shows 90 W m ⁻² for the upper ablation area, 35 Wm⁻² for ELA, 25 W m⁻² for the percolation zone and around zero W m⁻² for the dry-snow zone. This feature is caused by the variation in albedo and Values at ETH Camp (37 W m⁻²) and Gimex-FUA (38 W m⁻², adapted) are similar for July. It seems that this amount of net radiation can be expected at the ELA between 67° and 70°N.