Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:37:10.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When is communication a ‘meeting of minds’?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
*
College of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA; e-mail cxc04599@udelvm.bitnet.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do infants and young children (two-year-olds) possess an implicit theory of mind which is revealed through their communicative interactions or are they simply treating their interlocutors as objects to manipulate in service to their own material ends? Shatz & O'Reilly (1990) criticized a paper by Golinkoff (1986) for claiming that infants were attempting to communicate as opposed to simply manipulate their listeners. This paper takes exception to that argument. It reviews additional evidence which indicates that infants in the second year of life are capable of communicating for the sake of the ‘meeting of minds’. The alternative – treating young children's communications as only the firing off of conversational routines for the purpose of attaining material ends – seriously underestimates infants' knowledge of the communicative process.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 199 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

For their extremely insightful comments on this manuscript I would like to thank Lois Bloom, Helen Tager-Flusberg, Carolyn Mervis and Michael Tomasello.

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, D. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development 62, 875–90.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Beckwith, R. (1989). Talking with feeling: integrating affective and linguistic expression in early language development. Cognition and Emotion 3, 313–42.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Capatides, J. & Tackeff, J. (1981). Further remarks on interpretive analysis: in response to Christine Howe. Journal of Child Language 8, 403–11.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Structural relationships in children's utterances: syntactic or semantic? In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., McNew, S. & Beeghly-Smith, M. (1981). Early person knowledge as expressed in gestural and verbal communication: when do infants acquire a ‘theory of mind’? In Lamb, M. & Sherrod, L. (eds), Social cognition in infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Campos, J. J. & Stenberg, C. R. (1981). Perception, appraisal and emotion: the onset of social referencing. In Lamb, M. & Sherrod, L. (eds), Infant social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Franco, F. & Butterworth, G. (1991). Infant pointing: prelinguistic reference and co-reference. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. (1981). The case for semantic relations: evidence from the verbal and nonverbal domains. Journal of Child Language 8, 413–37.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. (1986). ‘I beg your pardon?’ The preverbal negotiation of failed messages. Journal of Child Language 13, 455–76.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. & Gordon, L. (1988). What makes communication run? Characteristics of immediate successes. First Language 8, 103–24.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. (1988). Moral development. In Bornstein, M. & Lamb, M. (eds), Developmental psychology: an advanced textbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lempers, J. D., Flavell, E. R. & Flavell, J. H. (1977). The development in very young children of tacit knowledge concerning visual perception. Genetic Psychology Monographs 95, 3–53.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1989). Children as common sense psychologists. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43, 426–9.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. & Petitto, L. (1979). Signing behavior in apes: a critical review. Cognition 7, 177–215.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1983). Communication. In Flavell, J. & Markman, E. (eds), Cognitive development. In P. Mussen (gen. ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (4th edn). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & O'Reilly, A. (1990). Conversational or communicative skill? A reassessment of two-year-olds' behaviour in miscommunication episodes. Journal of Child Language 17, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Conti-Ramsden, G. & Ewert, B. (1990). Young children's conversations with their mothers and fathers: differences in breakdown and repair. Journal of Child Language 17, 115–30.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Farrar, M. & Dines, J. (1983). Children's speech revisions for a familiar and unfamiliar adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27, 359–63.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1983). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M. & King, R. (1979). Child-rearing and children's prosocial invitations toward victims of distress. Child Development 50, 319–30.Google Scholar