Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:51:34.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibition of muscle growth in foetal sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. J. Swatland  and
R. G. Cassens
H. J. Swatland
Affiliation:
Muscle, Biology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, 1805 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
R. G. Cassens
Affiliation:
Muscle, Biology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, 1805 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eighteen foetal sheep were used to study the relationship between suboptimal growth and linear size of skeletal units, dry weights of representative muscles and muscle histology. Foetuses with suboptimal growth caused by inadequate maternal nutrition and competition with other foetuses showed a decrease in skeletomuscular growth although allometric growth was not affected. A slight correlation (r =0·14, P < 0·005) existed between dry weight of the longissimus dorsi and mean minimum myofibre diameter. On morphological evidence, myofibre hyperplasia was thought to be complete by approximately 80 days gestation in all foetuses. Increases in the number of myofibres crossing mid-length transverse sections of the sartorius occurred after this time but were thought to be due to intrafascicularly terminating myofibres growing in length. Suboptimal muscle growth of foetuses in the latter third of gestation was thought to be associated with an inhibition of growth in length of intrafascicularly terminating myofibres.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , June 1973 , pp. 503 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendall, J. R. & Voyle, C. A. (1967). A study of the histological changes in the growing muscles of beef animals. J. Fd Technol. 2, 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1968). Prenatal development of uniparous animals with particular reference to the influence of maternal nutrition in sheep. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 131–157. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Oroioth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep, p. 495. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr, Mason, I. L. & Robinson, T. J. (1971). Hammond's Farm Animals, p, 110, 4th edn.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956). A study of pre-natal growth and development in the sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47, 382–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, J. B. (1898). On the histogenesis of the striated muacle fibre, and the growth of the human sartorius muscle. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 9, 208–15.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1964). Nutrient Bequirements of Sheep. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Google Scholar
Swatland, H. J. (1973). Muscle growth in the fetal and neonatal pig. Submitted to J. Anim. Sci.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swatland, H. J. & Cassens, R. G. (1972). Muscle growth: The problem of muscle fibers with an intrafascicular termination. J. Anim. Sci. 35, 336–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swatland, H. J. & Cassens, R. G. (1973). Prenatal development, histochemistry and innervation of porcine muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 36 343–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, L. R. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 367–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlfart, G. (1937). Uber das Vorkommen verschieder Arten von Muskelfasern in der Skelettmuskulatur des Menschen und einiger Saugetiere. Ada Pschiat, Neurol. Suppl. 12, 1–119.Google Scholar