Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:53:23.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of different forms of soybean lipids on enteric methane emission, performance and meat quality of feedlot Nellore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2018

R. A. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
G. Fiorentini*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
J. D. Messana
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
J. F. Lage
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
P. S. Castagnino
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
E. San Vito
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
I. P. C. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
T. T. Berchielli
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil Department of Animal Science, INCT/CA – UFV, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: G. Fiorentini, E-mail: fiorentini.giovani@gmail.com

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of different forms of soybean lipids on enteric methane emission, intake, performance, digestibility and meat quality of 40 young Nellore bulls (initial body weight (BW) 444 ± 10.2 kg and 24 ± 2.1 months). The dietary treatments were as follows: NF = no dietary additional fat (46.0 g ether extract (EE)/kg diet), SO = soybean oil (62.0 g EE/kg diet), SB = soy beans (without any processing; 62.0 g EE/kg diet) and RPF = rumen-protected fat based on soybean oil (62.0 g EE/kg diet). The intake of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) was greater in the SO diet than those fed with NF. The SO diet decreased digestibility of NDF when compared with the NF and RPF diets. The diets did not affect digestibility of DM, OM, CP or emission of enteric methane. Animals fed with SO had greater average daily gain and feed efficiency in relation to the other diets tested. The SO diet increased hot and cold carcass weights and subcutaneous fat thickness of carcasses when compared with the NF diet. The proportions of saturated and unsaturated, mono and polyunsaturated, and n-3 and n-6 fatty acids were not affected significantly by treatments. The SO diets were demonstrated to be more beneficial for animal performance compared with diets without supplemental fat.

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aferri, G, Leme, PR, Luz e Silva, S, Putrino, SM and Pereira, ASC (2005) Desempenho e características de carcaça de novilhos alimentados com dietas contendo diferentes fontes de lipídios. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 34, 16511658.Google Scholar
AMSA (1995) Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation and Tenderness Measurements of Fresh Meat. Chicago, USA: American Meat Science Association.Google Scholar
AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.Google Scholar
Barletta, RV, Rennó, FP, Gandra, JR, Freitas Júnior, JE, Verdurico, LC, Mingoti, RD and Vilela, FG (2012) Blood parameters and performance of dairy cows fed with whole raw soybean. Archivos de Zootecnia 61, 483492.Google Scholar
Belew, JB, Brooks, JC, McKenna, DR and Savell, JW (2003) Warner-Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Science 64, 507512.Google Scholar
Bligh, EG and Dyer, WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37, 911917.Google Scholar
Brasil, (1997) Ministério da agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Regulamento da Inspeção Industrial e Sanitária de Produtos de Origem Animal [Food of Animal Origin Sanitary and Industry Inspection]. Brasília, Brasil: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Carvalho, IPC, Fiorentini, G, Berndt, A, Castagnino, PS, Messana, JD, Frighetto, RTS, Reis, RA and Berchielli, TT (2016) Performance and methane emissions of Nellore steers grazing tropical pasture supplemented with lipid sources. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 45, 760767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casali, AO, Detmann, E, Valadares Filho, SC, Pereira, JC, Henriques, LT, de Freitas, SG and Paulino, MF (2008) Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimentos in situ. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 335342.Google Scholar
Castagnino, PS, Messana, JD, Fiorentini, G, de Jesus, RB, San Vito, E, Carvalho, IPC and Berchielli, TT (2015) Glycerol combined with oils did not limit biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid but reduced methane production in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 201, 1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, RC, Adams, DC, Wallace, JD and Galyean, M (1986) Predicting digestibility of different diets with internal markers: evaluation of four potential markers. Journal of Animal Science 63, 14761483.Google Scholar
Cottle, DJ, Nolan, JV and Wiedemann, SG (2011) Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Animal Production Science 51, 491514.Google Scholar
Cross, HR, West, RL and Dutson, TR (1981) Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Science 5, 261266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daley, CA, Abbott, A, Doyle, PS, Nader, GA and Larson, S (2010) A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef. Nutrition Journal 9, 10.Google Scholar
Doreau, M and Ferlay, A (1995) Effect of dietary lipids on nitrogen metabolism in the lumen: a review. Livestock Production Science 43, 97110.Google Scholar
Dunne, PG, Monahan, FJ and Moloney, AP (2011) Current perspectives on the darker beef often reported from extensively-managed cattle: does physical activity play a significant role? Livestock Science 142, 122.Google Scholar
Edwards, HD, Anderson, RC, Miller, RK, Taylor, TM, Hardin, MD, Smith, SB, Krueger, NA and Nisbet, DJ (2012) Glycerol inhibition of ruminal lipolysis in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 51765181.Google Scholar
Eiras, CE, Marques, JA, do Prado, RM, Valero, MV, Bonafé, EG, Zawadzki, F, Perotto, D and do Prado, IN (2014) Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Science 96, 930936.Google Scholar
Ferreira, MA, Valadares Filho, SM, Marcondes, MI, Paixão, ML, Paulino, MF and Valadares, RFD (2009) Evaluation of markers in ruminant trials: digestibility. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 15681573.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, G, Berchielli, TT, Santana, MCA, Dian, PHM, Reis, RA, Sampaio, AAM and Biehl, MV (2012) Qualitative characteristics of meat from confined crossbred heifers fed with lipid sources. Scientia Agricola 69, 336344.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, G, Carvalho, IPC, Messana, JD, Castagnino, PS, Berndt, A, Canesin, RC, Frighetto, RTS and Berchielli, TT (2014) Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 16131620.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, G, Lage, JF, Carvalho, IPC, Messana, JD, Canesin, RC, Reis, RA and Berchielli, TT (2015 a) Lipid sources with different fatty acid profile alters the fatty acid profile and quality of beef from confined Nellore steers. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 28, 976986.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, G, Carvalho, IPC, Messana, JD, Canesin, RC, Castagnino, PS, Lage, JF, Arcuri, PB and Berchielli, TT (2015 b) Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on intake, nutrient digestion and ruminal fermentation of feedlot Nellore steers. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 28, 15831591.Google Scholar
Folch, J, Lees, M and Sloane Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497509.Google Scholar
Grainger, C and Beauchemin, KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 308320.Google Scholar
Harvatine, KJ and Allen, MS (2006) Effects of fatty acid supplements on ruminal and total tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 10921103.Google Scholar
Hess, BW, Moss, GE and Rule, DC (2008) A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86, Supp, E188E204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houben, JH, van Dijk, A, Eikelenboom, G and Hoving-Bolink, AH (2000) Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation, fat level and packaging on colour stability and lipid oxidation in minced beef. Meat Science 55, 331336.Google Scholar
ISO (1978) Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils Preparation of Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids (ISO 5509–2000). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC and McGuire, MA (2006) Major advances in nutrition: impact on milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 13021310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K, Huyler, M, Westberg, H, Lamb, B and Zimmerman, P (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environmental Science and Technology 28, 359362.Google Scholar
Jordan, E, Kenny, D, Hawkins, M, Malone, R, Lovett, DK and O'Mara, FP (2006) Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls. Journal of Animal Science 84, 24182425.Google Scholar
Jose Neto, A, Messana, JD, Ribeiro, AF, San Vito, E, Rossi, LG and Berchielli, TT (2015) Effect of starch-based supplementation level combined with oil on intake, performance, and methane emissions of growing Nellore bulls on pasture. Journal of Animal Science 93, 22752284.Google Scholar
Kramer, JKG, Fellner, V, Dugan, MER, Sauner, FD and Mossoba, MM (1997) Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis conjugated dieno and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32, 12191228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladeira, MM, Santarosa, LC, Chizzotti, ML, Ramos, EM, Machado Neto, O, Oliveira, DM, Carvalho, JRR, Lopes, LS and Ribeiro, JS (2014) Fatty acid profile, color and lipid oxidation of meat from young bulls fed ground soybean or rumen protected fat with or without monensin. Meat Science 96, 597605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lage, JF, Paulino, PVR, Valadares Filho, SC, Souza, EJO, Duarte, MS, Benedeti, PDB, Souza, NKP and Cox, RB (2012) Influence of genetic type and level of concentrate in the finishing diet on carcass and meat quality traits in beef heifers. Meat Science 90, 770774.Google Scholar
Lee, SY, Lee, SM, Cho, YB, Kam, DK, Lee, SC, Kim, CH and Seo, S (2011) Glycerol as a feed supplement for ruminants: in vitro fermentation characteristics and methane production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 269274.Google Scholar
Leng, RA (1993) Quantitative ruminant nutrition – a green science. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 363380.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Morgavi, DP and Doreau, M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351365.Google Scholar
Moloney, AP, Kennedy, C, Noci, F, Monahan, FJ and Kerry, JP (2012) Lipid and colour stability of M. longissimus muscle from lambs fed camelina or linseed as oil or seeds. Meat Science 92, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagaraja, TG, Newbold, CJ, Van Nevel, CJ and Demeyer, DI (1997) Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. In Hobson, PN and Stewart, CS (eds), The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 523632.Google Scholar
NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev.edn. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, EA, Sampaio, AAM, Henrique, W, Pivaro, TM, Rosa, BL, Fernandes, ARM and Andrade, AT (2012) Quality traits and lipid composition of meat from Nellore young bulls fed with different oils either protected or unprotected from rumen degradation. Meat Science 90, 2835.Google Scholar
Patra, AK (2013) The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: a meta-analysis. Livestock Production Science 155, 244254.Google Scholar
Rossi, LG, Fiorentini, G, Vieira, BR, José Neto, A, Messana, JD, Malheiros, EB and Berchielli, TT (2017) Effect of ground soybean and starch on intake, digestibility, performance, and methane production of Nellore bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 226, 3947.Google Scholar
Savell, JW, Mueller, SL and Baird, BE (2005) The chilling of carcasses. Meat Science 70, 449459.Google Scholar
Scollan, N, Hocquette, JF, Nuernberg, K, Dannenberger, D, Richardson, I and Moloney, AP (2006) Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science 74, 1733.Google Scholar
Steiner, R, Vote, DJ, Belk, KE, Scanga, JA, Wise, JW, Tatum, JD and Smith, GC (2003) Accuracy and repeatability of beef carcass longissimus muscle area measurements. Journal of Animal Science 81, 19801988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, HM, Bernard, JK, Amos, HE and Jenkins, TC (2004) Performance of lactating dairy cows fed whole cottonseed with elevated concentrations of free fatty acids in the oil. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 665671.Google Scholar
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2018) World Agricultural Production. Washington DC: USDA. Circular Series WAP 3–18. Available at https://apps.fas.usda.gov/PSDOnline/CircularDownloader.ashx?year=2018&month=03&commodity=production (Accessed 05 April 18).Google Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Paulino, PVR and Magalhães, KA (2006) Exigências Nutricionais de Zebuínos e Tabelas de Composição de Alimentos-BR CORTE, 1st Edn. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil: Suprema Grafica Ltda.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.Google Scholar
Westberg, HH, Johnson, KA, Cossalman, MW and Michal, J. J (1998) A SF6 Tracer Technique: Methane Measurement from Ruminants, 2nd Edn. Pullman, Washington, USA: Washington State University.Google Scholar
Wheeler, TL, Shackelford, SD and Koohmaraie, M (2000) Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles. Journal of Animal Science 78, 958965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulf, DM, Emnett, RS, Leheska, JM and Moeller, SJ (2002) Relationships among glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability. Journal of Animal Science 80, 18951903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinn, RA, Gulati, SK, Plascencia, A and Salinas, J (2000) Influence of ruminal biohydrogenation on the feeding value of fat in finishing diets for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 78, 17381746.Google Scholar
Zuin, RG, Buzanskas, ME, Caetano, SL, Venturini, GC, Guidolin, DGF, Grossi, DA, Chud, TCS, Paz, CCP, Lobo, RB and Munari, DP (2012) Genetic analysis on growth and carcass traits in Nellore cattle. Meat Science 91, 352357.Google Scholar