Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:50:10.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and yield of three varieties of wheat, with particular reference to the influence of unproductive tillers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. M. Bremner
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics.

Summary

An experiment was done to see if three varieties of wheat (Jufy I, Yeoman and Cappelle) of widely different tillering propensities differed in their response to early spring application of nitrogen; and, concurrently and conjointly, to assess the effects of unproductive tillers on the growth of productive shoots.

None of the varieties responded to the higher of two levels of nitrogen. The presence of a large number of unproductive tillers appeared to have only a transitory effect on the growth of productive shoots; the latter were able to grow rapidly after the death of tillers and caught up with productive shoots which had been subjected to much less inter-tiller competition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aspinwall, J. (1961). Growth attributes in some wheat varieties. B.Sc. dissertation, Univ. of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1966). Utilisation of growth responses in breeding new varieties of cereals. In The Orowth of Cereals and Grasses. Proc. 12th Easter School in Agric. Sci., Univ. of Nottingham. Ed. Milthorpe, and Ivins, . London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Bremner, P.M. (1969). Effects of time and rate of nitrogen application on tillering, ‘sharp eyespot’ (Rhizoctonia solani) and yield in winter wheat. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, A. H. & Drennan, D. S. H. (1966). Some aspects of the morphology and physiology of cereals in the vegetative phase. In The Orowth of Cereals and Grasses. Proc. 12th Easter School in Agric. Sci., Univ. of Nottingham. Ed. Milthorpe, and Ivins, . London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
King, R. W. & Evans, L. T. (1967). Photosynthesis in artificial communities of wheat, lucerne and sub-terranean clover plants. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 20, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, F. G. H. (1961). Varietal differences in some physiological characters of wheat. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1965). Light distribution and photo-synthesis in field crops. Ann. Bot. N.S. 29, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar