Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:10:56.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Basic Underwriting Rules be Applied to Average Crop Revenue Election and Supplemental Revenue?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

G. Art Barnaby Jr.
G. Art Barnaby Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers methods to adversely select on Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) and Supplemental Revenue (SURE). In the case of winter wheat, farmers had a large amount of a priori yield and price information before electing 2009 ACRE. Prior to the August 14 sign-up for ACRE, wheat was 3 months into the marketing year. In most years nearly half of the national average price is determined in the first 3 months of the marketing year. With this available information it was clear that Oklahoma, Texas, and Washington wheat would collect the maximum or near the maximum ACRE payment, while there was little chance that ACRE would pay on Colorado wheat.

Keywords

adverse selectionAverage Crop Revenue ElectionCrop InsuranceSupplemental RevenueQ18
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 517 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, B.A., and Paulson, N.D. “Crop Insurance: Inside or Outside the Farm Bill?” Iowa Ag Review, Winter 13,1(2007):1-3, 9.Google Scholar
Chicago Board of Trade. Handbook of Futures and Options. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2006.Google Scholar
Reese, M. “The Future of Farm Policy Being Debated.” Ohio's Country Journal, December 2004.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service's website: www.nass.usda.gov.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency's website: www.nass.usda.gov.Google Scholar
Woolverton, A., and Young, E. “Factors Influencing ACRE Program Enrollment.” Economic Research Report, Economic Research Service Bulletin, ERR-84, December 2009.Google Scholar
Zulauf, C. “Agricultural Policy at a Crossroads.” Written testimony before House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture, Subcommittee for General Farm Commodities and Risk Management. Internet site: http://aede.osu.edu/people/publications.php?user=Zulauf.1 (Accessed September 21, 2006).Google Scholar
Zulauf, C. “Comparison of Revenue Proposals,” Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University Staff Paper, May 2007.Google Scholar
Zulauf, C, Schnitkey, G., and Langemeier, M. “ACRE, Crop Insurance and SURE: Interaction and Overlap for US Midwest Crops,” Paper submitted to the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, February 2010.Google Scholar