Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:26:43.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of host plants on life history traits of Phenacoccus solenopsis (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2018

Abdul Manan Dogar ,
Mahmood Ayyaz ,
Naeem Abbas ,
Sarfraz Ali Shad  and
Afifa Naeem
Abdul Manan Dogar
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Mahmood Ayyaz
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Productions and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Nigde University, Nigde, Turkey
Naeem Abbas*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan Department of Entomology, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Sarfraz Ali Shad*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Afifa Naeem
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
*
*E-mail: naeemsurbana@gmail.com; sarfrazshad@bzu.edu.pk
*E-mail: naeemsurbana@gmail.com; sarfrazshad@bzu.edu.pk
Get access

Abstract

Cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley is an important polyphagous insect pest and causes severe losses to different crops worldwide. In the current study, we investigated the effect of different host plants, such as Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Plumeria rubra, Anthurium andraeanum, Jasminum sambac, and Hibiscus rosasinensis, on the biological parameters of P. solenopsis. The survival rate from crawler to adult, female nymphal duration, development time from crawler to female adult, and female adult weight were significantly different on the different hosts. Male nymphal duration, development time from crawler to male adult, pupal weight, emergence rate of male adults, and mean relative growth rate for male were similar on all the tested host plants. Pupal duration and generation time of male and female on H. rosasinensis were significantly shorter than on the other hosts. Adult male and female P. solenopsis longevity was significantly shorter on H. rosasinensis compared to other hosts. The fecundity was lower on C. pulcherrima and A. andraeanum and hatchability was lower on C. pulcherrima than on the other hosts. The net reproductive rate, the intrinsic rate of natural increase, and biotic potential and mean relative growth rate for female of P. solenopsis were significantly different on the tested hosts. Our results point to the role of host plants in increasing the populations of P. solenopsis and could help to design cultural management strategies.

Keywords

biotic potentialhost plantsmean relative growth ratemanagementPhenacoccus solenopsis
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 387 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, G., Arif, M. J., Ashfaq, M., Aslam, M. and Saeed, S. (2010) Host plants, distribution and overwintering of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis; Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12, 421–425.Google Scholar
Abbas, G., Arif, M. J. and Saeed, S. (2005) Systematic status of a new species of the genus Phenacoccus Cockerell (Pseudococcidae), a serious pest of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. in Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 27, 83–84.Google Scholar
Abbas, N., Shad, S. A. and Razaq, M. (2012) Fitness cost, cross resistance and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 103, 181–188.Google Scholar
Abbas, N., Shah, R. M., Shad, S. A., Iqbal, N. and Razaq, M. (2016) Biological traits analysis and stability of lambda-cyhalothrin resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitology Research 115, 2073–2080.Google Scholar
Afzal, M. B. S., Shad, S. A., Abbas, N., Ayyaz, M. and Walker, W. B. (2015) Cross-resistance, the stability of acetamiprid resistance and its effect on the biological parameters of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in Pakistan. Pest Management Science 71, 151–158.Google Scholar
Aheer, G. M., Shah, Z. and Saeed, M. (2009) Seasonal history and biology of cotton mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 423–431.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2005) Statistix for Windows. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
Arif, M. J., Rafiq, S. M., Dildar, G. M., Arshad, M. and Aslam, K. M. (2013) Studies on biological parameters of an invasive mealy bug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsely (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) on different host plants under laboratory conditions. Academic Journal of Entomology 6, 55–60.Google Scholar
Armbruster, P. and Hutchinson, R. A. (2002) Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 39, 699–704.Google Scholar
Awmack, C. S. and Leather, S. R. (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817–844.Google Scholar
Calatayud, P.-A., Polanía, M. A., Guillaud, J., Múnera, D. F., Hamon, J. C. and Bellotti, A. C. (2002) Role of single amino acids in phagostimulation, growth, and development of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus herreni. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104, 363–367.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, A. F., Kaydan, M. B., Muştu, M. and Ulusoy, M. R. (2016) Demographic parameters and biological features of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on four ornamental plants. Phytoparasitica 44, 75–82.Google Scholar
Fand, B. B. and Suroshe, S. S. (2015) The invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, a threat to tropical and subtropical agricultural and horticultural production systems–A review. Crop Protection 69, 34–43.Google Scholar
Foster, S. and Harris, M. (1997) Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest-management. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 123–146.Google Scholar
Goussain, M. M., Prado, E. and Moraes, J. C. (2005) Effect of silicon applied to wheat plants on the biology and probing behaviour of the greenbug Schizaphis graminum (Rond.)(Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotropical Entomology 34, 807–813.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S. M., Sappington, T. W., Legaspi, B. C., Liu, T.-X. and Setamou, M. (2001) Feeding and life history of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94, 566–575.Google Scholar
Hodgson, C., Abbas, G., Arif, M. J., Saeed, S. and Karar, H. (2008) Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discussion on seasonal morphological variation. Zootaxa 1913, 1–35.Google Scholar
Jia, B., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y. C., Liu, X., Gao, C. and Shen, J. (2009) Inheritance, fitness cost and mechanism of resistance to tebufenozide in Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Management Science 65, 996–1002.Google Scholar
Kalaiselvi, M. and Kalaivani, K. (2011) Phytochemical analysis and antilipid peroxidative effect of Jasminum sambac (L.) Ait Oleaceae. Pharmacologyonline 1, 38–43.Google Scholar
Kaydan, M. B., Çalışkan, A. F. and Ulusoy, M. R. (2013) New record of invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Turkey. EPPO Bulletin 43, 169–171.Google Scholar
Kedar, S. C., Saini, R. K. and Ram, P. (2013) Suitability of different host plants for survival and development of solenopsis mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera). Journal of Entomological Research 37, 47–50.Google Scholar
Khan, H. A. A., Shad, S. A. and Akram, W. (2012) Effect of livestock manures on the fitness of house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasitology Research 111, 1165–1171.Google Scholar
Malik, M. U., Javed, H. and Ayyaz, M. (2015) Evaluation of different groundnut Arachis hypogea L. cultivars against termites, Odontotermes obesus (Rambur) in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 3, 448–452.Google Scholar
Mamoon-ur-Rashid, M., Khattak, M. K. and Abdullah, K. (2012) Phenological response of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae) to three prominent host plants. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 44, 341–346.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P. (2003) Biological control of cassava and mango mealybugs in Africa, pp. 45–59. In Biological Control in IPM Systems in Africa (edited by Neuendschwander, P., Borgemeister, C. and Langewald, J.). CABI Publishing, UK.Google Scholar
Ravindhran, R. and Xavier, A. (1997) Effect of pyrethroids on resurgence of aphids (Aphis gossypii G.) and alteration of plant metabolism in cotton. Pesticide Research Journal 9, 79–85.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. V. P. and Guerrero, A. (2004) Interactions of insect pheromones and plant semiochemicals. Trends in Plant Science 9, 253–261.Google Scholar
Rehman, H. U., Nadeem, M., Ayyaz, M. and Begum, H. A. (2015) Comparative efficacy of neem oil and lambdacyhalothrin against whitefly (Bemesia tabaci) and jassid (Amrasca devastans Dist.) in okra field. Russian Agricultural Sciences 41, 138–145.Google Scholar
Saeed, R., Sayyed, A. H., Shad, S. A. and Zaka, S. M. (2010) Effect of different host plants on the fitness of diamond-back moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Crop Protection 29, 178–182.Google Scholar
Sana-Ullah, M., Arif, M. J., Gogi, M. D., Shahid, M. R., Adid, A. M., Raza, A. and Ali, A. (2011) Influence of different plant genotypes on some biological parameters of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis and its predator, Coccinella septempunctata under laboratory conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13, 125–129.Google Scholar
Singh, O. P. and Parihar, S. B. B. (1988) Effect of different hosts on the development of Heliothis armigera Hub. Bulletin of Entomology 29, 168–172.Google Scholar
Umbanhowar, J. and Hastings, A. (2002) The impact of resource limitation and the phenology of parasitoid attack on the duration of insect herbivore outbreaks. Theoretical Population Biology 62, 259–269.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Watson, G. W. and Zhang, R. (2010) The potential distribution of an invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis and its threat to cotton in Asia. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 12, 403–416.Google Scholar
Zhang, A., Amalin, D., Shirali, S., Serrano, M. S., Franqui, R. A., Oliver, J. E., Klun, J. A., Aldrich, J. R., Meyerdirk, D. E. and Lapointe, S. L. (2004) Sex pheromone of the pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus, contains an unusual cyclobutanoid monoterpene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 9601–9606.Google Scholar
Zhou, A., Lu, Y., Zeng, L., Xu, Y. and Liang, G. (2013) Effect of host plants on honeydew production of an invasive mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 26, 191–199.Google Scholar