Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:28:23.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hand Hygiene, Cohorting, or Antibiotic Restriction to Control Outbreaks of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

Camille Pelat ,
Lidia Kardaś-Słoma ,
Gabriel Birgand ,
Etienne Ruppé ,
Michaël Schwarzinger ,
Antoine Andremont ,
Jean-Christophe Lucet  and
Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Camille Pelat*
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France
Lidia Kardaś-Słoma
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
Gabriel Birgand
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
Etienne Ruppé
Affiliation:
AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Bacteriology Laboratory, F-75018 Paris, France
Michaël Schwarzinger
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France
Antoine Andremont
Affiliation:
AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Bacteriology Laboratory, F-75018 Paris, France
Jean-Christophe Lucet
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Affiliation:
INSERM, Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelization, Evolution (IAME), UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France University of Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France AP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, F-75018 Paris, France
*
Address correspondence to Camille Pelat, PhD, Infectious Disease Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice Cedex, France (c.pelat@invs.sante.fr).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The best strategy for controlling extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) transmission in intensive care units (ICUs) remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a stochastic transmission model to quantify the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the spread of ESBL-PE in an ICU.

METHODS

We modeled the evolution of an outbreak caused by the admission of a single carrier in a 10-bed ICU free of ESBL-PE. Using data obtained from recent muticenter studies, we studied 26 strategies combining different levels of the following 3 interventions: (1) increasing healthcare worker compliance with hand hygiene before and after contact with a patient; (2) cohorting; (3) reducing antibiotic prevalence at admission with or without reducing antibiotherapy duration.

RESULTS

Improving hand hygiene compliance from 55% before patient contact and 60% after patient contact to 80% before and 80% after patient contact reduced the nosocomial incidence rate of ESBL-PE colonization by 91% at 90 days. Adding cohorting to hand hygiene improvement intervention decreased the proportion of ESBL-PE acquisitions by an additional 7%. Antibiotic restriction had the lowest impact on the epidemic. When combined with other interventions, it only marginally improved effectiveness, despite strong hypotheses regarding antibiotic impact on transmission.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that hand hygiene is the most effective intervention to control ESBL-PE transmission in an ICU.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37(3):272–280

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Supplement 3 , March 2016 , pp. 272 - 280
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Part of this work was presented at the 53rd Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), September 2013, Denver, Colorado (abstract no. 1095).

References

REFERENCES

1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report 2014. Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Stockholm, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Nakayama, T, Ueda, S, Huong, BT, et al. Wide dissemination of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in community residents in the Indochinese peninsula. Infect Drug Resist 2015;8:1–5.Google Scholar
3. Casewell, M, Phillips, I. Hands as route of transmission for Klebsiella species. Brit Med J 1977;2:1315–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ruppé, E, Lixandru, B, Cojocaru, R, et al. Relative fecal abundance of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains and their occurrence in urinary tract infections in women. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:4512–4517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Austin, DJ, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA, Slaughter, S, Anderson, RM. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999;96:6908–6913.Google Scholar
6. Fries, J, Segre, AM, Thomas, G, Herman, T, Ellingson, K, Polgreen, PM. Monitoring hand hygiene via human observers: how should we be sampling? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:689–695.Google Scholar
7. Harris, AD, Pineles, L, Belton, B, et al. Universal glove and gown use and acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the ICU: a randomized trial. JAMA 2013;310:1571–1580.Google Scholar
8. Guyot, J. Etude sur l’évaluation des pratiques dans le cadre de la lutte contre les infections nosocomiales sur les « frictions hydro-alcooliques par spécialités médico-chirurgicales ». Lot n°2: Enquête sur le nombre d’opportunités d’hygiène des mains par spécialité médico-chirugicale. Ministère de la Santé, de la Jeunesse et des Sports et de la vie associative, Direction Générale de la Santé, Sous-direction Prévention des risques infectieux. 2008.Google Scholar
9. Venier, AG, Zaro-Goni, D, Pefau, M, et al. Performance of hand hygiene in 214 healthcare facilities in South-Western France. J Hosp Infect 2009;71:280–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care. 2009.Google Scholar
11. Surveillance des infections nosocomiales en réanimation adulte. France, résultats 2010 . REA-Raisin network website. http://www.invs.sante.fr/Publications-et-outils/Rapports-et-syntheses/Maladies-infectieuses/2012/Surveillance-des-infections-nosocomiales-en-reanimation-adulte. Published 2012. Accessed September 17, 2015.Google Scholar
12. Robert, J, Pean, Y, Varon, E, et al. Point prevalence survey of antibiotic use in French hospitals in 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:1020–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Nicolas-Chanoine, MH, Jarlier, V, Robert, J, et al. Patient’s origin and lifestyle associated with CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli: a case-control-control study. PloS One 2012;7:e30498.Google Scholar
14. Colodner, R, Rock, W, Chazan, B, et al. Risk factors for the development of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in nonhospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;23:163–167.Google Scholar
15. Stiefel, U, Pultz, NJ, Helfand, MS, Donskey, CJ. Increased susceptibility to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus intestinal colonization persists after completion of anti-anaerobic antibiotic treatment in mice. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:373–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. D’Agata, EMC, Webb, G, Horn, M. A mathematical model quantifying the impact of antibiotic exposure and other interventions on the endemic prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Infect Dis 2005;192:2004–2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Falagas, ME, Tansarli, GS, Karageorgopoulos, DE, Vardakas, KZ. Deaths attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:1170–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Bhalla, A, Pultz, NJ, Ray, AJ, Hoyen, CK, Eckstein, EC, Donskey, CJ. Antianaerobic antibiotic therapy promotes overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant, Gram-negative bacilli and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:644–649.Google Scholar
19. Gillespie, DT. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J Computat Physics 1976;22:403–434.Google Scholar
20. Blower, SM, Hartel, D, Dowlatabadi, H, Anderson, RM, May, RM. Drugs, sex and HIV: a mathematical model for New York City. Phil Trans Royal Soc London B 1991;331:171–187.Google Scholar
21. Sanchez, MA, Blower, SM. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the basic reproductive rate. Tuberculosis as an example. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:1127–1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Scheithauer, S, Haefner, H, Schwanz, T, et al. Compliance with hand hygiene on surgical, medical, and neurologic intensive care units: direct observation versus calculated disinfectant usage. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:835–841.Google Scholar
23. Armellino, D, Hussain, E, Schilling, ME, et al. Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1–7.Google Scholar
24. Steed, C, Kelly, JW, Blackhurst, D, et al. Hospital hand hygiene opportunities: where and when (HOW2)? The HOW2 Benchmark Study. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. McArdle, FI, Lee, RJ, Gibb, AP, Walsh, TS. How much time is needed for hand hygiene in intensive care? A prospective trained observer study of rates of contact between healthcare workers and intensive care patients. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:304–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Widmer, AE, Dangel, M. Alcohol-based handrub: evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:207–209.Google Scholar
27. Temime, L, Opatowski, L, Pannet, Y, Brun-Buisson, C, Boelle, PY, Guillemot, D. Peripatetic health-care workers as potential superspreaders. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009;106:18420–18425.Google Scholar
28. Overview of Intensive Care Units. French-speaking Intensive Care Society website. http://www.srlf.org/grandpublic/organisationsstructures/index.phtml. Published 2011. Accessed September 2, 2015.Google Scholar
29. Decree Regulating Intensive Care Organization. French Ministry of Health website. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000585557&categorieLien=id. Published 2002. Accessed September 2, 2015.Google Scholar
30. Sypsa, V, Psichogiou, M, Bouzala, GA, Hadjihannas, L, Hatzakis, A, Daikos, GL. Transmission dynamics of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and anticipated impact of infection control strategies in a surgical unit. PloS One 2012;7:e41068.Google Scholar
31. Huskins, WC, Huckabee, CM, O'Grady, NP, et al. Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1407–1418.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pelat supplementary material

Texts, Tables and Figures

Download Pelat supplementary material(File)
File 104.9 KB