Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T04:42:52.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ACQUISITION AND AUTOMATED RECTIFICATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION RGB AND NEAR-IR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS TO ESTIMATE PLANT BIOMASS AND SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY IN ARID AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

PETER SELSAM ,
WOLFGANG SCHAEPER ,
KATJA BRINKMANN  and
ANDREAS BUERKERT
PETER SELSAM
Affiliation:
Geographic Information Science (GIScience), Geohydrology and Modelling, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Löbdergraben 32, D-07743 Jena, Germany
WOLFGANG SCHAEPER
Affiliation:
Kapellenweg 39, D-88090Immenstaad, Germany
KATJA BRINKMANN
Affiliation:
Organic Plant Production and Agroecosystems Research in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Kassel, Steinstrasse 19, D-37213Witzenhausen, Germany
ANDREAS BUERKERT*
Affiliation:
Organic Plant Production and Agroecosystems Research in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Kassel, Steinstrasse 19, D-37213Witzenhausen, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: tropcrops@uni-kassel.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Increasing image resolution and shrinking camera size facilitates easy mounting of digital cameras on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to collect large amounts of high-resolution aerial photos for soil surface and vegetation monitoring. Major challenges remain geo-referencing of these images, reliable stitching (mosaicking), elimination of geometric image distortions and compensation of limited image quality and high cost of the equipment. In this study, we report upon the design and field-testing of a custom-made, cost-effective mini-UAV allowing the acquisition of RGB and near-IR images covering areas of 1–2 km2 in each flight and the development of a software tool to automatically combine the geo-referenced images into a seamless image mosaic. Object-orientated image classification was used to estimate plant biomass. The images allowed to determine the distribution and biomass of selected plant species and other landscape features such as field borders and settlement patterns as well as to construct a simple 3D model of the topography of the surveyed area. The setup facilitates the cost-effective acquisition, mosaicking and classification of hundreds of RGB and near-IR images with a spatial resolution of 5–10 cm.

Type
Short Communication
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 144 - 157
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Böhm, B., Böhm, C., Buschmann, M., Chmara, S., Flügel, W. A., Krüger, L., Neumann, M., Püls, A., Reinhold, M., Sagischewski, H., Selsam, P., Vörsmann, P. and Wilkens, C. S. (2010). ANDROMEDA Anwendung Drohnen-basierter Luftbilder – Mosaikierung, Entzerrung und Daten-Auswertung, Abschlussbericht des Verbundprojekts, 31. 12. 2010, FKZ IN6041 (BMWi), Germany.Google Scholar
Böhm, B., Böhm, C., Chmara, S., Flügel, W. A., Krüger, T., Neumann, M., Reinhold, M., Sagischewski, H., Selsam, P., Vörsmann, P. and Wilkens, S. (2008). ANDROMEDA – Drohnenbasierte Erfassung von Forstkalamitäten – von der Vision zum produktiven Verfahren. Forst und Holz 63:37–42.Google Scholar
Buerkert, A., Mahler, F. and Marschner, H. (1996). Soil productivity management and plant growth in the Sahel: Potential of an aerial monitoring technique. Plant and Soil 180:29–38.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Summy, K. R., Escobar, D. E. and Davis, M. R. (2003). An overview of aircraft remote sensing in integrated pest management. Subtropical Plant Science 55:59–67.Google Scholar
Gérard, B., Buerkert, A., Hiernaux, P. and Marschner, H. (1997). Non-destructive measurement of plant growth and nitrogen status of pearl millet with low-altitude aerial photography. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43:993–998.Google Scholar
Hattenberger, G., Bronz, M. and Gorraz, M. (2014). Using the Paparazzi UAV system for scientific research. In International Micro Air Vehicle (IMAV) Conference and Competition 2014, 247–252. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
Hunt, E.R., Cavigelli, M., Daughtry, C. S. T., McMurtrey, J. E., Walthall, C. L. (2005). Evaluation of digital photography from model aircraft for remote sensing of crop biomass and nitrogen status. Precision Agriculture 6:359–378.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. R., Hively, W. D., Fujikawa, S. J., Linden, D. S., Daughtry, C. S. T. and McCarty, G. W. (2010). Acquisition of NIR-green-blue digital photographs from unmanned aircraft for crop monitoring. Remote Sensing 2:290–305.Google Scholar
Kralisch, S., Böhmm, B., Böhmm, C. and Buschm, C., Fink, M., Fischer, C., Schwartze, C., Selsam, P., Zander, F. and Flügel, W.-A. (2012). ILMS – a software platform for integrated environmental management. In International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Managing Resources of a Limited Planet, Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzig, Germany, 2012, Seppelt, R., Voinov, A.A., Lange, S., Bankamp, D. (Eds.) pp 2864–2871. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) http://www.iemss.org/society/index.php/iemss-2012-proceedings.Google Scholar
Laliberte, A. S., Herrick, J. E., Rango, A. and Winters, C. (2010). Acquisition, orthorectification, and object-based classification of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for rangeland monitoring. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 76:661–672.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 (2):91–110.Google Scholar
Mayer, S. (2011). Application and improvement of the unmanned aerial system SUMO for atmospheric boundary layer studies. PhD Thesis University of Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M., Selsam, P. and Matejka, E. (2008). A software tool for object-based image analysis and the evaluation of its segmentation capabilities. In Proceedings EARSeL Joint Workshop: Remote Sensing - New Challenges of High Resolution, 5–7 March, 287–297 (Ed Jürgens, C.). Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
Ries, J. B. and Marzolff, I. (1997). Identification of sediment sources by large-scale aerial photography taken from a monitoring blimp. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 22 (3–4):295–302.Google Scholar
Ries, J. B. and Marzolff, I. (2003). Monitoring of gully erosion in the Central Ebro Basin by large scale aerial photography taken from a remotely controlled blimp. Catena 50 (2–4):309–328.Google Scholar
Schaeper, W. (2006). Telescopic eyeglasses and model airplanes. Innovation, 17:52–57.Google Scholar
Siebert, S., Gries, D., Zhang, X., Runge, M. and Buerkert, A. (2004). Non-destructive dry matter estimation of Alhagi sparsifolia vegetation in a desert oasis of NW China. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:365–372.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Sao, R. and Singh, K. P. (2007). A remote sensing assessment of pest infestation on sorghum. Advances in Space Research 39 (1):155–163.Google Scholar
Wilkens, C. S., Krüger, T., Martin, T., Scholtz, A., Vörsmann, P., Reinhold, M. and Selsam, P. (2010). Project ANDROMEDA: Automated generation of area photographs with unmanned aircraft systems. European Journal of Navigation 8 (3):32–38.Google Scholar