Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:18:50.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facing the Chop: Redefining British Antler Mattocks to Consider Larger-Scale Maritime Networks in the Early Fifth Millennium Cal BC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Benjamin Elliott
Benjamin Elliott*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK
*
[email: ben.elliott@york.ac.uk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides a critical review of Smith's (1989) typological discussion of the antler ‘mattocks’ of the British Mesolithic. The evidence for use of the term ‘mattock’ is assessed in relation to a new technological analysis of antler tools from Britain. In the light of the data presented here and developments in the study of Mesolithic osseous technologies from elsewhere in northwest Europe, a redefinition of the terminology and typology used to study these artefacts is presented. The potential for this redefinition to shape research across Mesolithic Europe is demonstrated through a discussion of the earliest occurrence of antler T-axes around the North Sea basin.

Nous présentons ici une revue critique de la discussion typologique de Smith (1989) sur les ‘pioches’ en andouiller du Mésolithique britannique. Les critères qui avaient mené au terme ‘pioche’ sont réévalués en tenant compte d'une nouvelle analyse technologique des outils en andouiller de Grande-Bretagne. En vertu des données présentées ici et des développements dans l'étude des technologies en matières osseuses mésolithiques dans d'autres parties d'Europe du nord-ouest, nous proposons une redéfinition de la terminologie et de la typologie utilisée dans l'étude de ces artefacts. Cette rédéfinition a un potentiel à façonner la recherche à travers l'Europe mésolithique qui est illustré par un débat sur la première apparition de haches en T en andouiller autour du bassin de la Mer du Nord. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Dieser Beitrag betrachtet die typologische Diskussion von Geweih-’Hacken’ des britischen Mesolithikums durch Smith (1989) kritisch. Die Gesichtspunkte für die Verwendung des Begriffes ‚Hacke‘ werden im Licht einer neuen technologischen Analyse von Geweihgeräten aus Großbritannien bewertet. Vor dem Hintergrund der hier vorgestellten Daten und von Entwicklungen in der Forschung zu mesolithischen Knochentechnologien in anderen Regionen Nordwesteuropas, wird eine Neubewertung der Terminologie und Typologie, die zur Untersuchung dieser Artefakte Anwendung finden, präsentiert. Das Potential, durch diese Neubewertung die Forschungsansätze zum mesolithischen Europa zu schärfen, wird an einer Diskussion zum frühesten Auftreten der Geweih-T-Äxte im Umfeld des Nordseebeckens demonstriert. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

MesolithicantlerT-axemattockNorth Sea basin5th Millenium BCMésolithiqueandouillerhache en Tpiochebassin de la Mer du Nord5e millénaire av. J.-C.MesolithikumGeweihT-AxtHackeNordseebecken5. Jahrtausend v. Chr.
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 2015 , pp. 222 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, S. 1994. Ringkloster: Ertebolle Trappers and Wild Boar Hunters in Eastern Jutland. A Survey. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 12:13–60.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. 2002. The Transition from the Early to the Late Stone Age. In: Fischer, A. & Kristiansen, K. eds. The Neolithisation of Denmark: 150 Years of Debate. Sheffield: JR Collis Publications, pp. 219–31.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. & Johansen, E. 1986. Ertebølle Revisited. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 5:31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. 2007. Prehistoric Coastal Communities: The Mesolithic in Western Britain. CBA Research Report 149. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. 1914. An Oransay Shell-Mound—A Scottish Pre-Neolithic Site. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 48:52–108.Google Scholar
Blankholm, H. 2008. Southern Scandinavia. In: Bailey, G. & Spikins, P., eds. Mesolithic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–31.Google Scholar
Bogucki, P. 2008. The Danubian-Baltic Borderland: Northern Poland in the Fifth Millenium BC. In: Van Gijn, A., Coles, B., Fokkens, H. & Kleijn, J., eds. Between Foraging and Farming: An Extended Broad Spectrum of Papers Presented to Leendert Louwe Kooimans. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 40. Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
Bonsall, C. & Smith, C. 1989. Late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Bone and Antler Artifacts from Britain: First Reactions to Accelerator Dates. Mesolithic Miscellany, 10:33–38.Google Scholar
Bonsall, C. & Smith, C. 1992. New AMS C14 Dates for Antler and Bone Artifacts from Great Britain. Mesolithic Miscellany, 13:28–34.Google Scholar
Bonsall, C., Tolan-Smith, C. & Saville, A. 1995. Direct Dating of Mesolithic Antler and Bone Artifacts from Great Britain: New Results for Bevelled Tools and Red Deer Antler Mattocks. Mesolithic Miscellany, 16:2–10.Google Scholar
Burkitt, M. 1926. Our Early Ancestors: An Introductory Story of Mesolithic, Neolithic and Copper Age Cultures in Europe and Adjacent Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 1954. Excavations at Star Carr: An Early Mesolithic Site at Seamer near Scarborough, Yorkshire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 1969. The Mesolithic Settlement of Northern Europe: A Study of the Food-Gathering Peoples of Northern Europe during the Early Post-Glacial Period. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. & Piggott, S. 1965. Prehistoric Societies. London: Hutchinson and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Classon, A. 1983. Spoolde: Worked and Unworked Antlers and Bone from Spoolde, De Gaste, The Ijsselmeerpolders and Adjacent Areas. Palaeohistoria, 25:77–128.Google Scholar
Crombé, P. 2010. Contact and Interaction Between Early Farmers and Late Hunter-Gatherer in Belgium During the 6th and 5th Millenium Cal BC. In: Groneborn, D. & Petrasch, J., eds. The Spread of the Neolithic in Central Europe: International Symposium, Mainz, June 2005. Frankfurt: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, pp. 551–68.Google Scholar
Crombé, P., Van Strydonck, M. & Hendrix, V. 1999. AMS-Dating of Antler Mattocks from Schelde River in Northern Belgium. Notae Praehistoricae, 19:111–19.Google Scholar
David, E. 1999. L'industrie en matières dures animals du Mésolithique ancient et moyen en Europe du Nord. Contribution de l'analyse technologique à la definition du Maglemosien. , Université Nanterre-Paris X.Google Scholar
Elliott, B. 2013. Antlerworking Practices in Mesolithic Britain. , University of York.Google Scholar
Finlayson, B. 1995. Complexity in the Mesolithic of the Western Scottish Seaboard. In: Fischer, A., ed. Man and Sea in the Mesolithic. Coastal Settlement above and below the Present Sea Level. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 261–6.Google Scholar
Garrow, D. & Sturt, F. 2011. Grey Waters Bright with Neolithic Argonauts? Maritime Connections and the Mesolithic–Neolithic Transition within the ‘Western Seaways’ of Britain, c. 5000-3500 BC. Antiquity, 85:59–72.Google Scholar
Hardy, K. & Wickham-Jones, C. 2009. Mesolithic and Later Sites around the Inner Sound, Scotland: The Work of the Scotland's First Settlers Project 1998–2004. Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports 31. York: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Hartz, S. 2004. Aktuelle Forschung zur Chronologie und Siedlungsweise der Ertebölle- und frühen Trichterbecherkultur in Schleswig-Holstein. Vol. 52. In: Lübke, H., Lüth, F. & Terberger, T., eds. Bodendenkmalpflege in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Jahrbuch 2004. Schwerin: Mecklenburg Vorpommern, pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
Hurt, V. 1982. Les haches en bois de cerf en Belgique. Amphora, 29:14–24.Google Scholar
Jensen, G. 1991. Unusable Axes? An Experiment with Antler Axes of the Kongemose and Ertebølle Cultures. In: Madsen, B., ed. Eksperimentel Arkæologi: Studier i teknologi og kultur. Lejre: Historisk-Arkæologisk Forsøgscenter, pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
Kaute, P., Lübke, H. & Schindler, G. 2004. Der endmesolithisch/frühneolithische Fundplatz Stralsund-Mischwasserspeicher - Zeugnisse früher Bootsbautechnologie an der Ostseeküste Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns. Vol. 52. In: Lübke, H., Lüth, F. & Terberger, T., eds. Bodendenkmalpflege in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Jahrbuch 2004. Schwerin: Mecklenburg Vorpommern, pp. 221–41.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. 1929. Antiquities from the Middle Thames. Archaeological Journal, 86:69–98.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L. 1971. Mesolithic Bone and Antler Artefacts from the North Sea and the Netherlands. Bertichten van de Rijksdienst voor bet Oudheidkundig, 20:27–73.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L. ed. 2001. Archeologie in de Betuweroute Hardinxveld-Giessendam De Bruin Een kampplaats uit het Laat-Mesolithicum en het begin van de Swifterbant-cultuur (5500-4450 v. Chr.). Rapportage Archeologische Monumentenzorg 88. Amersfoort: Betuweroute.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. 1987. Excavations on Oronsay: Prehistoric Human Ecology on a Small Island. Vol. 1. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Middleton, R. & Edwards, B. 1993. An Antler Mattock from Longton, Lancashire. In: Middleton, R., ed. North West Wetlands Survey Annual Report 1993. Lancaster: Lancaster Univeristy Archaeological Unit, pp. 49–63.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. ed. 2000. Hunter-Gatherer Landscape Archaeology: The Southern Hebrides Mesolithic Project, 1988–98. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Rankama, T. 2003. The Colonisation of Northernmost Finnish Lapland and the Inland Areas of Finmark. In: Larsson, L., Kindgern, H., Knuttson, K., Loeffler, D. & Akerlund, A., eds. Mesolithic on the Move: Papers Presented at the Sixth International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Stockholm 2000. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K. 1994. Radiocarbon Datings at Ringkloster. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 12:61–64.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 2001. A Mesolithic Barbed Antler Point from the Foreshore of the Forth Esturary, Near Carriden, Falkirk. Calatria, 15:70–80.Google Scholar
Saville, A. ed. 2004a. Mesolithic Scotland and its Neighbours: The Early Holocene Prehistory of Scotland, its British and Irish Context, and Some Northern European Perspectives. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 2004b. The Material Culture of Mesolithic Scotland. In: Saville, A., ed. Mesolithic Scotland and its Neighbours: The Early Holocene Prehistory of Scotland, its British and Irish Context, and Some Northern European Perspectives. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, pp. 185–221.Google Scholar
Schulting, R., Tresset, A. & Dupont, C. 2004. From Harvesting the Sea to Stock Rearing along the Atlantic Façade of North-West Europe. Environmental Archaeology, 9:143–54.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1989. British Antler Mattocks. In: Bonsall, C., ed. The Mesolithic in Europe: Papers Presented at the Third International Symposium, Edinburgh 1985. Edinburgh: J Donald, pp. 272–83.Google Scholar
Stapel, B., Scheild, N., Rosendahl, W., Pollmann, H. & Baales, M. 2012. Neu datierte mesolithische Fundplätze und organische Artefakte aus Westfalen Mesolithikum. Archäologie in Westfalen, 12:27–30.Google Scholar
Tolan-Smith, C. & Bonsall, C. 1999. Stone Age Studies in the British Isles: The Impact of Accelerator Dating. Mémoires de la Société préhistorique française, 26:249–5.Google Scholar
Turner, W. 1889. On Some Implements of Stag's Horn Associated with Whale Skeletons Found in the Carse of Stirling. Report on the Meetings of the British Association, 59:789–91.Google Scholar
Warren, G. 2005. Technology. In: Conneller, C. & Warren, G., eds. Mesolithic Britain and Ireland. Stroud: Tempus, pp 13–33.Google Scholar
Wickham-Jones, C. 1990. Rhum: Mesolithic and Later Sites at Kinloch Excavations 1984–86. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Wicks, K., Pirie, A. & Mithen, S.J. 2014. Settlement Patterns in the Late Mesolithic of Western Scotland: The Implications of Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates and Inter-Site Technological Comparisons. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41:406–22.Google Scholar
Woodman, P. 1989. A Review of the Scottish Mesolithic: A Plea for Normality Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 119:1–32.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. & Bonsall, C. eds. 1977. Gazetteer of Mesolithic Sites in England and Wales; With a Gazetteer of Upper Palaeolithic Sites in England and Wales. Council for Brittish Archaeology Research Report 20. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M. 1994. Plant Use in the Mesolithic and its Role in the Transition to Farming. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 60:35–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar