Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:15:22.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the history of downright1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

BELÉN MÉNDEZ-NAYA
BELÉN MÉNDEZ-NAYA*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Filoloxía Inglesa, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de Filoloxía, 15702 Santiago de Compostela, Spainiamendez@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data retrieved from a variety of diachronic corpora and the OED quotation database, this diachronic study sheds light on the origin and development of the degree function of a low-frequency intensifier, English downright, both as an adverb (it's downright rude) and as a reinforcing adjective (downright nonsense). The history of downright illustrates the interplay between lexicalization and grammaticalization in the evolution of a single item and provides a good example of the crucial role of context and inferencing in semantic change, and of two different trajectories in the development of intensifiers (adjunct > degree modifier, and descriptive adjective > affective adjective > intensifier).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 267 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia & González-Díaz, Victorina. 2004. Back to the very beginning: the development of intensifiers in Early Modern English. Presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Vienna.Google Scholar
Bäcklund, Ulf. 1973. The collocations of adverbs of degree in English. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Bauer, Winifred. 2002. Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30, 244–57.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. Degree words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borst, Eugene. 1902. Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered. On the late use of temporal adverbs. In Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José & Pérez-Guerra, Javier (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 67–98. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BT = Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
BTS = Toller, T. Northcote. 1921. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2006. The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of Adverb all. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2), 345–70.Google Scholar
Cacchiani, Silvia. 2006. Towards a corpus-based combinatory dictionary of English predicate-intensifier collocations. In Papi, Marcella Bertuccelli (ed.), Studies in the semantics of lexical combinatory patterns, 45–97. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
Clark Hall, J. R. 1960. A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary, 4th edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
DOE = Amos, Ashley Crandell, Antonette, diPaolo Healey et al. (eds.). 2003. Dictionary of Old English: A to F on CD-ROM. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Fettig, Adolf. 1934. Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2006. On the position of adjectives in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2), 253–88.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer, & Diewald, (eds.), 83–102.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. Using the OED quotations data base as a corpus – a linguistic appraisal. ICAME Journal 28, 17–30.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32, 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, John (ed.). 2000. Corpora galore: Analysis and techniques in describing English. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Wischer, & Diewald, (eds.), 1–18.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Wischer, & Diewald, (eds.), 143–61.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory. Statistics, frequencies and beyond. In Lindquist, Hans & Mair, Christian (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present-day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
MED = Kurath, Hans, et al. (eds.). 1952–2001. Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003. On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiþe. English Studies 84, 372–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2004. Full good, right good, well good? On the competition of intensifiers in the Middle English period. Presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Vienna.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2006. Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27, 141–69.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2007. He nas nat right fat: On the origin and development of the intensifier right. In Mazzon, Gabriella (ed.), Studies in Middle English forms and meanings, 191–207. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén (forthcoming). The which is most and right harde to answere: Intensifying right and most in earlier English. In Dury, Richard, Gotti, Maurizio & Dossena, Marina (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2006: Lexical and semantic change, vol. 2, 31–51. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24, 359–80.Google Scholar
OALD = Wehmeier, Sally (ed.). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary, 7th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online: www.oup.com/elt/global/products/oaldGoogle Scholar
OED = Oxford English dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online version with revisions: www.oed.comGoogle Scholar
Pahta, Päivi. 2006. Ful holsum and profitable for the bodi: A corpus study of amplifiers in medieval English medical texts. In Dossena, Marina & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific language, 207–28. Bern and Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000a. It's well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In Kirk, (ed.), 147–60.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000b. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalisation. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard & McCully, Chris (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10ICEHL, 233–58. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1992. English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Kellermann, Günter & Morrissey, Michael D. (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition, 529–45. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 2000. It's enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In Kirk, (ed.), 177–90.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Roberts, Chris. 2005. So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80 (3), 280–300.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2007. A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35 (1), 5–29.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2006. The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. In Kemenade, Ans van & Los, Bettelou (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 335–59. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar