Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:13:38.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inorganic pH Dependent Cation Exchange Charge of Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

V. V. Volk
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
M. L. Jackson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sodium hydroxide titration curves were determined on H resin treated montmorillonite, untreated acid and neutral soils of different origins and on the same soils with an H resin treatment. The acid montmorillonite titration curve reveals four buffer ranges corresponding to hydronium ions (range I), monomelic trivalent aluminum ions Range II), and two pH dependent charge ranges. Untreated acid soils contained pH dependent buffer zones governed jointly by the organic fraction, the soil pH, the presence of monomeric trivalent aluminum, and the exchange blocking mechanisms of other cations. Following an H resin treatment, soils containing less than 2 per cent of organic matter exhibited a clearly defined third buffer range (Range III) from pH 5.5 to 7.6. The inflection points are masked in the pH dependent buffer range in soils containing more than 2 per cent organic matter. The presence of added aluminum increased the pH dependent charge in an acidified montmorillonite while added ferric iron slightly decreased it. The natural acid weathering processes in soils result in some blocking of pH dependent charge as in Dodge soil of Wisconsin (KCl pH 4.5). When greater acidity develops, a large pH dependent charge results, as in Coolville soil in Ohio (KCl pH 4.0), and the lime requirement of the soil thus increases greatly.

Type
General
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1963

References

Aldrich, D. G., and Buchanan, J. R. (1958) Anomalies in techniques for preparing H-bentonites: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 22, pp. 281285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barshad, I. (1960) Significance of the presence of exchangeable magnesium ions in acidified clays: Science, v. 131, pp. 988990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, F. (1959) Distribution of water and electrolyte between homoionic clays and saturating NaCl solutions: In Clays and Clay Minerals, 8th Conf., Pergamon Press, London, pp. 122149.Google Scholar
Bradfield, R. (1927) The saturation capacity of colloidal clay soils: 1st Congr. Intern. Soc. Soil Sci., v. 4, pp. 858868.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1953) The dioctahedral analogue of vermiculite: Clay Min. Bull., v. 2, pp. 6469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernov, V. A. (1959) Genesis of exchangeable aluminum in soils: Sov. Soil Sci., v. 10, pp. 11501156.Google Scholar
Dion, H. G. (1944) Iron oxide removal from clays and its influence on base exchange properties and X-ray diffraction patterns of the clays: Soil Sci., v. 58, pp. 411424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. V., and Jackson, M. L. (1962) Properties of intergradient chlorite-expansible layer silicates of soils: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 26, pp. 358362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieldes, M., and Schofield, R. K. (1960) Mechanisms of ion adsorption by inorganic soil colloids: New Zealand J. of Sci., v. 3, pp. 563579.Google Scholar
Garrels, R. M., and Christ, C. L. (1956) Application of cation exchange reactions to the beidellite of the Putnam silt loam soils: Amer. J. Sci., v. 254, pp. 372379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, R. C., Jackson, M. L., Hole, F. D., and Lee, G. B. (1960) Chemical weathering of layer silicate clays in loess-derived Tama silt loam of southwestern Wisconsin: In Clays and Clay Minerals, 8th Conf., Pergamon Press, London, pp. 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harward, M. E., and Coleman, N. T. (1954) Some properties of H- and Al-clays and exchange resins: Soil Sci., v. 78, pp. 181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hissink, D. J. (1924) Base exchange in soils: Trans. Faraday Soc., v. 20, pp. 551566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis: Prentice-Hall , Englewood Cliffs, N. J., pp. 4546.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1960) Structural role of hydronium in layer silicates during soil genesis: Trans. Intern. Congr. Soil Sci., 7th Congr., Madison, v. 2, pp. 445455.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1963a) Aluminum bonding in soils: A unifying principle in soil science: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 27, pp, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1963b) Interlaying of expansible layer silicates in soils by chemical weathering: Clays and Clay Minerals, 11th Conf., Pergamon Press, London, pp. 2946.Google Scholar
Jonas, E. C. (1963) Ion exchange at edge and interlayer in montmorillonite differing in size: Science, v. 140, pp. 7576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeney, D. R., and Corey, R. B. (1963) Factors affecting the lime requirements of Wisconsin soils: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 27, pp. 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P. F. (1955) The role of aluminum in the titration of bentonite: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 19, pp. 135139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. E., and Bergman, W. E. (1942) The electro-chemical properties of mineral membranes. II. Measurement of potassium-ion activities in colloidal clays: Jour. Phys. Chemistry, v. 46, pp. 5261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, A. L., and Whittig, L. D. (1961) Iron adsorption by montmorillonite systems: I. Preliminary studies, II. Determination of adsorbed iron: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 25, pp. 278286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paver, H., and Marshall, C. E. (1934) The role of aluminum in the reactions of the clays: Jour. Soc. Chem. Ind., v. 53, pp. 750760.Google Scholar
Pommer, A. M., and Carroll, D. (1960) Interpretation of Potentiometric titration of H-montmorillonite: Nature, v. 185, pp. 595596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, P. F. (1961) Effects of pH on the cation-exchange capacity of surface soils: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 25, pp. 9698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, C. I. (1960) Aluminum in interlayers of vermiculite: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 24, pp. 2632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, C. I., and Obenshain, S. S. (1955) Chemical and clay mineral properties of a red- yellow podzolic soil derived from muscovite schist: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 19, pp. 334339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawhney, B. L., and Jackson, M. L. (1958) Soil montmorillonite formulas: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 22, pp. 115118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1939) The electrical charges on clay particles: Soils and Fertilizers, v. 2, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U. (1961) Uber das lösliche und austauschbare aluminium im Boden und seine Wirkung auf die Pflanze: Landw. Forsch., v. 14, pp. 5359.Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U., and Jackson, M. L. (1963) Hydrogen-aluminum clays: A third buffer range appearing in Potentiometric titration: Science, v. 139, pp. 10521054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwertmann, U., and Jackson, M. L. (1964) Influence of hydroxy aluminum ions on pH titration curves of hydronium-aluminum clays: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 28. pp. 179183 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, M. J., and Rich, C. I. (1962) Aluminum fixation in montmorillonite: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 26, pp. 3336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, E. E., McLean, E. O., and Pratt, P. F. (1961) Buffer methods for determining lime requirement of soils with appreciable amounts of extractable aluminum: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 25, pp. 274277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabaugh, W. H. (1952) The heat of neutralization of hydrogen-bentonite: J. Amer. Chem. Soc., v. 74, pp. 44624464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyermark, A. (1951) Quantitative Organic Microanalysis’. The Blakeston Company, New York, pp. 82121.Google Scholar
Truog, E. (1916) A new apparatus for the determination of soil carbonates and new methods for the determination of soil acidity: Jour. Ind. Eng. Chem., v. 8, pp. 341345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar