Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-06T20:22:18.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Doubtful A Priori

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Extract

Mathematics has become so sophisticated that it is easy to lose touch with the mathematical realities out of which it arises. Many nowadays think of mathematics as complicated games with forests of symbols. Yet this is an image which could not have got a grip on the ancient mathematicians, like those of the Pythagorean brotherhood, who stood nearer to the roots of those forests. Now we are lost in the higher branches of mathematics, and we sometimes forget that all these growing branches are nourished ultimately by roots far below in down-to-earth reality.

The early Pythagoreans discovered things which are thus and so, and which could not have been otherwise. Yet although these things could not have been otherwise, the Pythagoreans who discovered them could have done otherwise. Hence the truths which the Pythagoreans discovered are things which would still have been so even if no one had ever discovered them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D.M.A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility (New York: Cambridge University Press 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H.Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983)Google Scholar
Bigelow, J.C.Real Possibilities,’ Philosophical Studies 52 (1987) 85-112Google Scholar
Bigelow, J.C.The Reality of Numbers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988)Google Scholar
Bigelow, J.C. and Pargetter, R.J.Science and Necessity (London: Cambridge University Press 1990)Google Scholar
Burkert, W.Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1972)Google Scholar
Forrest, P. and Armstrong, D.M.The Nature of Number,’ Philosophical Papers 16 (1987) 165-86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galileo, GalileiDialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. H. Crew and A. de Salvio, trans. (New York: Dover 1954)Google Scholar
Guthrie, K.S.The Pythagorean Sourcebook (Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press 1987)Google Scholar
Heath, T.L.A History of Greek Mathematics I. From Thales to Euclid (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1921)Google Scholar
Irving, A.D. ed. Physicalism in Mathematics (Dordrecht: Kluwer 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P.The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1983)Google Scholar
Kline, M.Mathematics and the Physical World (New York: Dover 1959)Google Scholar
Lewis, O.K.Parts of Classes (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1991)Google Scholar
Maddy, P.Realism in Mathematics (Oxford: Clarendon 1990)Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper and Row 1961)Google Scholar