Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:03:21.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CASSIDA AZUREA FAB. (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): HOST SPECIFICITY AND ESTABLISHMENT IN CANADA AS A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT AGAINST THE WEED SILENE VULGARIS (MOENCH) GARCKE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D.P. Peschken ,
R. Declerck-Floate  and
A.S. McClay
D.P. Peschken
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4P 3A2
R. Declerck-Floate*
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada TIJ 4B1
A.S. McClay
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, Bag 4000, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
*
2Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cassida azurea Fab. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was studied as an agent to control the weed bladder campion, Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke (Caryophyllaceae). To supplement previously published data on the beetle’s host range, additional no-choice experiments were conducted. First-stage larvae were offered seven plant species related to bladder campion. Only one adult male developed on Dianthus caryophyllus L. cv. China Doll and one female on Lychnis × haageana Lem. This female did not produce eggs when it continued to feed on L. × haageana. In tests with adults, oogenesis occurred only if fed with bladder campion, and one laid one egg while feeding on Gypsophila pacifica Kom. First-stage larvae did not develop to adults on three native North American Silene spp., but two adults developed on three other native species. Based on results from these experiments and reports in the literature, it was concluded that C. azurea has a very narrow host range and permission for field releases was granted in 1989. Releases were made in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta from 1989 to 1993. Cassida azurea survived from 3 to 6 years and was considered established at 8 of the 18 release sites in the three provinces but has not yet increased to densities sufficient to reduce bladder campion populations.

Résumé

Cassida azurea Fab. (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae) a été étudié comme agent de contrôle contre la mauvaise herbe silène enflé, Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke (Caryophyllaceae). Afin de supplémenter les donnés publiés auparavant concernant la spécifité d’hôte du coléoptère, d’autres expériences à choix obligatoire ont été menées. Le larves de premier stade ont été mises en presence d’un choix sept espèces apparentées au silène enflé. Seulement un adulte mâle a émergé sur Dianthus caryophyllus L. cv. China Doll et une femelle sur Lychnis × haageana Lem. Cette femelle n’a pas pondu d’oeufs quand elle continuait à se nourrir de L. × haageana. Quant aux tests faits avec les adultes, oogénèse s’est produite seulement quand les coléoptères étaient nourris de silène enflé, et une femelle a pondu un oeuf pendant qu’elle se nourrissait de Gypsophila pacifica Kom. Les larves des premier stade ne sont pas maturées jusqu’au stade adulte sur trois espèces de Silene indigènes de l’Amérique du Nord, mais deux adultes son développées sur trois autres espèces indigènes. Le résultats de ces expériences ainsi que le rapports dans la littérature laissant conduire que la C. azurea a une grande spécifité d’hôte et la permission pour des lâchages dans le champs a été accordée en 1989. Des lâchages ont été effectués au Manitoba, en Saskatchewan et en Alberta de 1989 a 1993. Cassida azurea a survécu de 3 à 6 ans, et a été considéré comme établi dans 8 parmi les 18 sites de lâchage dans les trois provinces. Il ne s’est pas encore augmenté suffisammant pour réduire les populations de silène enflé.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 129 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 949 - 958
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alex, J.F. 1966. Surveys of weeds of cultivated land in the prairie provinces. Research Branch, Canada Agriculture, Regina, SK.Google Scholar
Ali, S. (Ed.) 1995. Crop Protection with Chemicals. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, AGDEX 606–1.Google Scholar
Allen, C. 1994. Evaluation of Cassida azurea establishment in Manitoba. p. 5in Weed Biology, Ecology and Weed Management. Technical Reports. Expert Committee on Weeds, Western Canada Section Meeting, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 5–8 Dec. 1994.Google Scholar
Bailey, L.H., and Bailey, E.Z.. 1976. Hortus Third. A Concise Dictionary of Plants Cultivated in the United States and Canada. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
Bibolini, C. 1975. Contributo all conoszenza dei crisomelidae italiani (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae). III. Osservazioni sulla etologia di Cassida denticollis Suffr., Cassida prasina Illig. e Cassida omata Creutz e loro distribuzione geografica. Frustula Entornologica 13: 1–91.Google Scholar
Blossey, B., Schroeder, D., Hight, S., and Malecki, R.A.. 1994 a. Host specificity and environmental impact of the weevil Hylobius transversovittatus, a biological control agent of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Science 42: 128–133.Google Scholar
Blossey, B., Schroeder, D., Hight, S., and Malecki, R.A.. 1994 b. Host specificity and environmental impact of two leaf beetles (Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla) for biologiocal control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Science 42: 134–140.Google Scholar
Caputa, J. 1983. Weeds of meadows (Silene vulgaris, Silene Flos-cuculi, description, control). Les mauvaises herbes des prairies. Revue Suisse D'Agriculture 15(5): 214–215.Google Scholar
Clement, S.L., and Cristofaro, M.. 1995. Open-field tests in host-specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Biocontrol Science & Technology 5: 395–406.Google Scholar
Desfeux, C., and Lejeune, B.. 1996. Systematics of Euromediterranean Silene (Caryophyllaceae): evidence from a phylogenetic analysis using ITS sequences. Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Sciences Serie III, Sciences de la Vie 319: 351–358.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, M. 1985. Weed alert—bladder campion. pp. 38–39in 1985 Manitoba Weed Fair, Brandon, 17–18 January 1985, Brandon, Manitoba.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1964. Host specificity of Altica carduorum Guer. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 42: 857–862.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1988. Environmental impact of weed-control insects. BioScience 38: 542–548.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, C., and Maguire, B.. 1947. A revision of the North American species of Silene. University of Washington Publications in Biology 13.Google Scholar
Manitoba Agriculture. 1990. Guide to Chemical Weed Control. Soils and Crops Branch, Manitoba Agriculture, Winnipeg, MB.Google Scholar
Maw, M.G. 1976. Biology of the tortoise beetle, Cassida hemisphenca (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a possible biological control agent for the bladder campion, Silene cucubalus (Caryophyllaceae), in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 945–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maw, M.G., and Steinhausen, W.R.. 1980 a. Corrigendum for “Biology of the tortoise beetle, Cassida hemispherica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a possible biological control agent for bladder campion, Silene cucubalus (Caryophyllaceae), in Canada” [Can. Ent. 108: 945–954, 1976]. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 639.Google Scholar
Maw, M.G., and Steinhausen, W.R.. 1980 b. Cassida azurea (Coleoptera: Chrysome1idae)—not C. hemisphaerica—as a possible biological control agent of bladder campion, Silene cucubalus (Caryophyllaceae) in Canada. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 90: 420–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClay, A.S. 1989. Selection of Suitable Target Weeds for Classical Biological Control in Alberta. Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegreville, AB, Report AECV89–R1.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 1995. Crop Protection Guide 1995. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, Regina, SK.Google Scholar
Scoggan, H.J. 1979. The Flora of Canada. Part 4. Dicotyledoneae (Losaceae to Compositae). National Museum of Natural Sciences (Ottawa) Publications in Botany 7(4): 1117–1711.Google Scholar
Smith, J.M. 1958. Biological control of klamath weed, Hypericum perforatum L., in British Columbia. pp. 561–565in Becker, E.C. (Ed.), Proceedings, 10th International Congress of Entomology, Montréal, 17–25 August, 1956. Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., and Webb, D.A.. 1964. Flora Europaea Vol. 1. Lycopodiaceae to Platanaceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wall, D.A., and Morrison, I.N.. 1990. Competition between Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Weed Research 30: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, D. 1996. The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 407–431.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H., and Harris, P.. 1966. Ceutorhynchus litura (F.) (Col. Curculionidae), a potential insect for the biological control of thistle, Cirsium awense (L.) Scop., in Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 44: 23–38.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H., and Harris, P.. 1984. Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel.) (Col., Curcnlionidae), a successful agent for the biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie. 97: 36–42.Google Scholar