Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T02:16:02.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of a “War” on Economic Crime: The Case of Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anne Alvesalo  and
Steve Tombs
Anne Alvesalo*
Affiliation:
Police College of Finland
Steve Tombs*
Affiliation:
Center for Criminal Justice, Liverpool John Moores University
*
Police College of Finland, Miestentie 2-PL13, FIN-02151 Espoo, Finland. Email: anne.alvesalo@pakk.polisi.fi.
Liverpool John Moores University, Center for Criminal Justice, Josephine Butler House, 1 Myrtle Street, Liverpool L74 DN, United Kingdom. Email: s.p.tombs1@livjm.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1996, the Finnish government initiated an Action Plan aimed at the more effective control of economic crime and the grey economy, involving wide-scale reform in legislation, regulatory agencies, enforcement practice, and research activities. The emergence of this Action Plan forms the empirical focus of this article, which addresses two specific research questions. First, what were the economic, social and political factors that produced this Action Plan? Second, how can this initiative contribute to a critical assessment of the claims of “globalization discourses,” which seem to render such an idiosyncratic nation-state development as unlikely? The article critically examines some of the elements of globalization discourses with particular respect to the implications for the nature of contemporary states and the possibilities for the more effective regulation of corporate activity. It then outlines the processes and events that allowed the Finnish Action Plan to emerge. Finally, it asks what lessons are to be learnt from the Finnish case, before identifying some further lines of enquiry to be pursued. This Finnish initiative seems to represent one important instance of the extent to which states can develop relatively autonomous economic and social policy, even where this appears to be detrimental to the interests of “capital.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 2001 , pp. 239 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2001 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1. We would like to acknowledge the support for this research provided by the Finnish Ministry of Interior, the Police College of Finland and the Centre for Criminal Justice, Liverpool John Moores University. Particular thanks are due to Teuvo Arolainen, Sari Heiskanen, Anne Jokinen, Timo Korander, Joonas Naava, Frank Pearce, Joe Sim, and to Dave Whyte, as well as to Cédric Dupont and three anonymous reviewers, who have all provided advice, assistance or comments in the course of our writing this article. We remain, of course, responsible for errors and omissions herein.

References

Alho, K., Widgren, M., Baldwin, R.E., Lundberg, and L. 1994. “Finland: economics and politics of EU accession.” World Economy 17 (5): 701–718.Google Scholar
Alvesalo, A. 1994. “The Phenomenon Called Economic Crime.” In Perspectives on Economic Crime, edited by Alvesalo, A. and Laitinen, A. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Alvesalo, A. 1998a. Ylämäki, Alamäki? Talousrikollisuuden Kontrolli ja Tutkimus Suomessa (Uphill, Downhill. The Control and Study of Economic Crime in Finland). Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
Alvesalo, A. 1998b. “They Are Not Honest Criminals.” In Organised Crime & Crime Prevention—What Works? Rapport fra NSfK's 40. forskeseminar. Espoo, Finland 1998. Copenhagen: Scandinavian Research Council from Criminology.Google Scholar
Alvesalo, A. 2000. “Downsized by Law, Ideology and Pragmatics—policing economic crime.” In Controversial Issues in Economic Crime, edited by Potter, G. Anderson Publishing, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Alvesalo, A. and Tombs, S. 2001. “Can Economic Crime Control be Sustained?” Innovation: the European Journal of the Social Sciences 14 (1): 35–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. (2000). “Editorial. Renewals,” New Left Review (January/February): 5–24.Google Scholar
Andersson, J.O. (1996). “Fundamental Values for a Third Left.” New Left Review (March/April): 66–78.Google Scholar
Andersson, J.O., Kosonen, P., Vartiainen, and J. 1993. The Finnish Model of Economic and Social Policy: from emulation to crash. Äbo: Äbo Akademic Tryckeri.Google Scholar
Berg, M. 1997. “Now it is Finland that is Leading Sweden in the Economic Stakes.” Business Economist 3: 35–42.Google Scholar
Berglund, S. 1990. “Finland in a Comparative Perspective.” In Finnish Democracy, edited by Sundberg, J. and Berglund, S. Jyvaskyla: The Finnish Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Bernauer, T. and Achini, C. 2000. “From ‘Real’ to ‘Virtual’ States? Integration of the World Economy and its Effects on Government Activity.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 223–276.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, T. 1996. “The Three Nordic 1994 Referenda Concerning Membership in the EU.” Cooperation and Conflict 31 (1): 11–36.Google Scholar
Bordes, D. 1993. “The Finnish Economy: the boom, the debt, the crisis and the prospects.” In Three Assessments of Finland's Economic Crisis and Crisis Policy, edited by Bordes, C., Currie, D., and Söderström, H. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.Google Scholar
Borg, O. 1990. “Neo-Corporatism and Incomes Policy: the Finnish Case.” In Finnish Democracy, edited by Sundberg, J. and Berglund, S. Jyvaskyla: The Finnish Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Grabosky, P., Wilson, and P. 1987. “The Myth of Community Tolerance Toward White-Collar Crime.” Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20: 33–44.Google Scholar
Calavita, K. and Pontell, H. 1990. “‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’: deregulation, crime and crisis in the savings and loan industry.” Crime and Delinquency, 36: 309–341.Google Scholar
Callaghan, J. and Tunney, S. 2000. “Prospects for Social Democracy: a critical review of the arguments and evidence.” Contemporary Politics 6 (1): 55–75.Google Scholar
Christie, N. 1986. “Suitable Enemies.” In Abolitionism. Towards non-repressive approach to crime, edited by Bianchi, H. and van Swaaningen, R. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, N. 1993. Crime Control as Industry. Towards GULAGS, Western Style? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Currie, D. 1993. “The Finnish Economic Crisis: analysis and prescription.” In Three Assessments of Finland's Economic Crisis and Crisis Policy, edited by Bordes, D. et al. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1990. Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. London: Chatto.Google Scholar
Dicken, P. 1992. Global Shift. The internationalization of economic activity. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
Drees, B. and Pazarbasioglu, C. 1998. The Nordic Banking Crises: Pitfalls in Financial Liberalization? Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Government, Finnish. 1996. Action Program of the Finnish Government to Reduce Economic Crime and Black Economy. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Fooks, G. 1999. “The Serious Fraud Office: policing the city or policing for the city?” Paper Presented at the British Criminology Conference, Liverpool, 13–16 July.Google Scholar
Forma, P. 1999. Interests, Institutions and the Welfare State. Studies on public opinion towards the welfare state. STAKES Research Report 102, Helsinki: STAKES.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, S. and Law, D. 1993. “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital.” In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, edited by Gill, S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P., Gustafsson, B., Palmer, and E., Eds. 1997. Changing Patterns in the Distribution of Economic Welfare: An International Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1998. False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. and Uusitalo, H. 1990. “The Welfare State and Poverty in Finland and Sweden from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s.” Review of Income and Wealth 36 (3): 249–266.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. and Palmer, E. 1997. “Changes in Swedish Inequality: a study of equivalent income, 1975–1991.” In Changing Patterns in the Distribution of Economic Welfare: an international perspective, edited by Gottschalk, P. et al. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Hakman, M. 1993. Sata Konkurssia. Verontarkastuksiin ja Asiantuntijahaastatteluihin Perustuva Tutkimus Konkursseihin Liittyvistä Rikoksista (One Hundred Bankruptcies. A Study of Criminality Connected with Bankruptcy Situations). Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitos.Google Scholar
Työryhmämuistio, Valtionvarainministeriön. 1999. Harmaan Talouden Projektiryhmän Loppuraportti. (The Report of the Project group on Grey Economy), Helsinki: Valtionvarainministeriö.Google Scholar
Hay, C. 1999. The Political Economy of New Labour. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Helleiner, E. 1996. “Post-Globalization: is the financial liberalization trend likely to be reversed?” In States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization, edited by Boyer, R. and Drache, D. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herrala, R. 1999. “Banking Crises vs. Depositor Crises: the era of the Finnish markka, 1865–1998.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 47 (2): 5–22 Google Scholar
Hillyard, P. and Tombs, S. 1999. “From Crime to Social Harm? Criminology, Zemiology and Justice,” 27th Annual Meeting of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, Palanga, Lithuania, 2–5 September.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. M. 1997. The Wealth of States: a comparative study of international economic and political change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. 1994. “Global Capital and the Nation-State.” Capital & Class 52 (Spring).Google Scholar
Honkapohja, S. and Koskela, E. 1999. “The Economic Crisis of the 1990s in Finland.” Economic Policy 29 (October): 401–412.Google Scholar
Honkapohja, S., Koskela, E., Paunio, and J. 1996. “The Depression of the 1990s in Finland: an analytic view.” Finnish Economic Papers 9: 37–54.Google Scholar
Huhtamäki, A. 1994. White-Collar Bank Crime in Finland: A study of insider abuse and outsider fraud as cause to banking crisis in Finland—with comparison to Sweden and to the USA (English Summary). Painatuskeskus Oy: Helsinki.Google Scholar
Isaksson, G. E. and Akademi, A. 1994. “Party Behavior in the Finnish Parliament.” Scandinavian Political Studies 17 (2): 91–107.Google Scholar
Jantti, M. and Ritakallio, V-M. 1997. “Income Inequality and Poverty in Finland in the 1980s.” In Changing Patterns in the Distribution of Economic Welfare: an international perspective, edited by Gottschalk, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1982. The Capitalist State. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1990. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, J. E. and Mattila, M. 1994. “The Vicious Circle of Cutback Policies: citizens’ attitudes toward cutbacks in Finnish welfare services.” Scandinavian Political Studies 17 (4): 289–304.Google Scholar
Jonkka, J. 1991. Syytekynnys (The Threshold to Prosecute), Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys.Google Scholar
Jonung, L., Soderstrom, H. T., Stymne, and J. 1996. “Depression in the North—Boom and Bust in Sweden and Finland, 1985–93,” Finnish Economic Papers 9 (1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Juusila, O., Hentila, S., Nevakivi, and J. 1999. From Grand Duchy to a Modern State. A political history of Finland since 1809. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. 1992. “The Politics of Universalism—the Case of Finnish Sickness Insurance.” Journal of Social Policy 21 (1): 25–52.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. 1993. “The Finnish Welfare State—a Scandinavian Welfare State?” In The Nordic Welfare State As An Idea And As Reality, edited by Kosonen, P. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. 1995. “Attitudes on Means-Tested Social Benefits in Finland.” Acta Sociologica 38 (4): 299–310.Google Scholar
Katz, J. 1980. “The Social Movement Against White-Collar Crime.” In Criminology Review Yearbook (Vol. 2), edited by Bittner, E. and Messinger, S. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. 1984. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland and the politics of industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keranen, M. 1990. “Introductory Notes.” In Finnish “Undemocracy”—essays on gender and politics, edited by Keranen, M. Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Kiander, J. and Vartia, P. 1996. “The Great Depression of the 1990s in Finland.” In Finnish Economic Papers 9 (1): 72–88.Google Scholar
Killick, M. 1999. Fraudbusters. The inside story of the Serious Fraud Office. London: Indigo.Google Scholar
Kivimaki, T. 1999. “Finland, a Case of Beneficial Integration.” Journal of International Relations and Development 2 (2): 154–168.Google Scholar
Klinge, M. 1999. A Brief History of Finland. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
Kontulainen, J. and Vilmunen, J. 1994. “Viewpoints on ‘Three Assessments of Finland's Economic Crisis and Economic Policy.’” Bank of Finland Discussion Paper (May). Helsinki: Bank of Finland.Google Scholar
Korander, T. 1994. Suomalaisten Turvallisuuden Kokeminen ja Suhtautuminen Poliisiin 1993 (Finns experience of security and attitudes towards the police 1993), Sisaasianministerio, Inkresministeriet.Google Scholar
Korander, T. 1998. “Katujen Nollatoleranssi, Tilastojen Kelvottomuus Ja Ongelmien Poliisisointi.” (Zero Tolerance, the Incompetecy of Statistics and the Policezation of Problems), Oikeus-lehti.Google Scholar
Korander, T. 1999. “‘Policezation’ and Zero Tolerance in Finland.” Paper Presented in American Society of Criminology Annual Meetings (17–20 November), Toronto.Google Scholar
Kosonen, P. 1993. “The Finnish Model and the Welfare State in Crisis.” In The Nordic welfare state as an idea and as reality, edited by Kosonen, P. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kramer, R.C. 1989. “Criminologists and the Social Movement Against Corporate Crime.” Social Justice 16 (2): 145–164.Google Scholar
Lahti, R. 1983. “Finland National Report.” Revue International de Droit Penal 54: 249–262.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A. and Alvesalo, A., 1994. Talouden Varjopuoli (The Dark Side of Economy), Helsinki: Sisäministeriö.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A. and Virta, E. 1998. Economic Crimes—theory and practice. Helsinki: The Police College of Finland.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppala, T. 1998. Regulating the Prison Population. Experiences from a long-term policy in Finland. National Institute of Legal Policy Research Communications 38, Helsinki: National Institute of Legal Policy Research.Google Scholar
Lazarus, N. 1998/99. “Charting Globalization.” Race & Class 40 (2/3): 92–109.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M. 1997. “Capital Flows Promote Finnish Integration into the Global Economy.” Bank of Finland Bulletin 71 (11): 8–11.Google Scholar
Levi, M. 1993. The Investigation, Prosecution and Trial of Serious Fraud. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Research Study No. 14. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Mattila, M. 1994. “Hierarchy or Competition?” Acta Sociologica 37 (4): 371–381.Google Scholar
Mattila, M. and Uusikyla, P. 1997. “The Politics of Scarcity: social-welfare and health-care cutbacks in Finland, 1991–1995.” West European Politics 20 (4): 146–163.Google Scholar
McRae, K.D. 1997. “Contrasting Styles of Democratic Decision Making: adversarial versus consensual politics.” International Political Science Review 18 (3): 279–295.Google Scholar
Michie, J. and Grieve Smith, J., Eds. 1999. Global Instability. The political economy of world governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Navarro, V. 1999. “The Political Economy of Welfare States in Developed Capitalist Countries.” International Journal of Health Services 29 (1): 1–50.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1999. Economic Survey of Finland. July 1999. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oy Dagmar Ab. 1996. “The Campaign Against Grey Economy Was Well Received By The Public.” Press Release, 12 May. Helsinki: Oy Dagmar Ab.Google Scholar
Pearce, F. and Tombs, S. 1998. Toxic Capitalism. Corporate crime and the chemical industry. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pearce, F. and Tombs, S. 2001. “States, Corporations and the ‘New’ World Order.” In Controversial Issues in Economic Crime, edited by Potter, G. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, J. 1992. “Corporatism and Economic Performance in Sweden, Norway, and Finland.” In Social Corporatism—a superior economic system? edited by Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M., Rowthorn, and B. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peltonen, M., ed. 1989. State, Culture and the Bourgeoise. Aspects of the Peculiarity of the Finnish. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Perraton, J., Goldblatt, D., Held, D., McGrew, and A. 1997. “The Globalization of Economic Activity.” New Political Economy 2 (2): 257–277.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1971/1944. The Great Transformation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. 1997. “The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 531–551.Google Scholar
Radice, H. 2000. “Responses to Globalization: a critique of progressive nationalism.” New Political Economy 5 (1): 5–19.Google Scholar
Raunio, T. 1999. “Facing The European Challenge: Finnish parties adjust to the integration process.” West European Politics 22 (1): 138–159.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. 1996. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” NBER Working Paper 5537 (April).Google Scholar
Ruostetsaari, I. 1993. “The Anatomy of the Finnish Power Elite.” Scandinavian Political Studies 16 (4): 305–338.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. 1995. Radical Political Economy. A critique. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Showstack Sassoon, A. 2001. “Globalization, Hegemony and Passive Revolution.” New Political Economy 6 (1): 5–17.Google Scholar
Sihvo, T. and Uusitalo, H. 1995. “Economic Crises and Support for the Welfare State in Finland, 1975–93.” Acta Sociologica 38 (3): 251–262.Google Scholar
Siisiainen, M. 1992. “Social Movements, Voluntary Associations and Cycles of Protest in Finland 1905–91.” Scandinavian Political Studies 15 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Singleton, F. 1987. The Economy of Finland in the Twentieth Century. Bradford: University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Slapper, G. and Tombs, S. 1999. Corporate Crime. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Snider, L. 1991. “The Regulatory Dance: understanding reform processes in corporate crime.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 19: 209–236.Google Scholar
Snider, L. 1993. Bad Business. Corporate Crime in Canada. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
Snider, L. 2000. “The Sociology of Corporate Crime: An Obituary (Or: Whose Knowledge Claims Have Legs?).” Theoretical Criminology 4 (2): 169–206.Google Scholar
Söderström, H. 1993. “Finland's Economic Crisis: causes, present nature, and policy options.” In Three Assessments of Finland's Economic Crisis and Crisis Policy, edited by Bordes, D. et al. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.Google Scholar
Soros, G. 1998. The Crisis of Global Capitalism. Open Society Endangered. London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1994. “Wake Up, Krasner! The world has changed.” Review of International Political Economy 1 (2) (Summer).Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1996. The Retreat of the State: the diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suontausta, S. and Hämäläinen, H. 2000. Report on Discontinuation of Bankruptcies due to lack of Funds, Helsinki: The Office of Bankruptcy Ombudsman (Konkurssiasiamiehen Toimisto).Google Scholar
Sutherland, E.H. 1983. White-Collar Crime. The Uncut Version. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taloudellisen rikollisuuden selvittelytyöryhmän mietintö (The Report of the Committee on Economic Crime). 1983. Oikeusministeriön lainvalmisteluosaston julkaisu (June). Helsinki.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2001). “The 2000 Corruption Perceptions Index,” www.gwdg.de/∼uwvw/2000Data.html.Google Scholar
Vayrynen, R. 1993. “Finland and the European Community—changing elite bargains.” Cooperation and Conflict 28 (1): 31–46.Google Scholar
Vento, H. 1992. Velallisen Rikoksista Konkurssissa (On Bankruptcy Crimes). Helsinki: Lakimiesliiton Kustannus.Google Scholar
Vihriälä, V. 1997. Banks and the Finnish Credit Cycle 1986–1995. Bank of Finland Studies E:7. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.Google Scholar
Virta, E. 1999. “A Thief is a Criminal Who has Not Had Enough Time to Start a Company.” In Crime-Risk-Security, edited by Laitinen, A. and Olgiati, V. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Virta, E. 2000. “Do Penniless White-Collar Offenders Steal, Batter Others and Drink-Drive?” Turku Law Journal 2 (1): 59–101.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weaitt, M. 1995. “The Serious Fraud Office: Nightmares (and Pipe Dreams) on Elm Street.” In Frontiers of Criminality, edited by Loveland, I. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. 1997. “Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State.” New Left Review 225 (September/October): 3–27.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. 1999. “Managed Openness: beyond neoliberal globalism.” New Left Review 238 (November/December): 126–140.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. and Hobson, J. M. 1995. States and Economic Development. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Whyte, D. and Tombs, S. 1998. “Capital Fights Back: risk, regulation and profit in the UK offshore oil industry.” Studies in Political Economy 57 (September): 73–101.Google Scholar