Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T01:29:40.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies of the responses of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera to carbon dioxide, acetone and other chemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. A. Vale
G. A. Vale
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P. O. Box 8283, Causeway, Salisbury, Zimbabwe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In studies in the Zambesi Valley, Zimbabwe, carbon dioxide alone dispensed at 2·5 to 15 litres/min, or acetone alone dispensed at 0·3 to 300 g·h, increased by up to six times the catches of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw, and G. pallidipes Aust. from stationary biconical traps, stationary electrocuting traps used with and without a visual target, and a mobile party of hand-net catchers. Catches were increased further when the chemicals were dispensed together. Carbon dioxide at 2·5 litres/min plus acetone at 15 g/h was about half as effective as ox odour for enhancing the catches from an electrocuting trap plus target; the efficacy of carbon dioxide at 15 litres/min plus acetone at 300 g/h was not significantly different from that of ox odour. Several short-chain ketones, and also formaldehyde and propionaldehyde, were attractive. Several long-chain ketones, and also heptaldehyde and caproic acid, were repellent. Carbon dioxide was attractive for Tabanidae, Stomoxyinae and non-biting Muscidae. Acetic acid was repellent for Stomoxyinae and non-biting Muscidae.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 563 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bursell, E. (1977). Chemosterilisation of tsetse flies using a pressurised metepa aerosol.—Trans. Rhod. scient. Ass. 58, 43–47.Google Scholar
Challier, A. & Laveissiere, C. (1973). Un nouveau piège pour la capture des glossines (Glossina: Diptera, Muscidae): description et essais sur le terrain.—Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Entomol. med. Parasitol. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
Frezil, J. L. & Carnevale, P. (1976). Utilisation de la carboglace pour la capture de Glossina fuscipes quanzensis Pires, 1948, avec le piège Challier-Laveissière. Conséquences épidémiologiques.—Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Entomol. med. Parasitol. 14, 225–233.Google Scholar
Gaddum, J. H. (1961). Pharmacology.—5th edn, 587 pp. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. & Vale, G. A. (1978). The effect of host odour concentration on catches of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera in the field.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974 a). New field methods for studying the responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to hosts.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974 b). The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545–588.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1979). Field responses of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) to odours of men, lactic acid and carbon dioxide.—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 459–467.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. & Hargrove, J. W. (1979). A method of studying the efficiency of traps for tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) and other insects.—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. & Phelps, R. J. (1978). Sampling problems with tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae).—J. appl. Ecol. 15, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar