Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:03:00.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis of milk fat and opportunities for nutritional manipulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J.J. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Dairy Production Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

Milk fat consists of approximately 960-980 g of triacylglycerol, 20-25 g of 1,2-diacylglycerol, 10 g of phospholipid, 5g of cholesterol and very small quantities of free fatty acids and monoacylglycerol per kg. There are three stages in milk fat biosynthesis: the accumulation of fatty acids in the mammary cells through de-novo synthesis or absorption from the blood stream, triacylglycerol construction and fat globule assembly and secretion. Fatty acids in mammary secretory cells arise from two sources. Those having between 4 and 14 carbon atoms are synthesised de-novo in the mammary gland whereas those with 18 carbon atoms are of dietary origin and are absorbed from the blood stream. Palmitic acid (16 carbon atoms) is supplied almost equally from the diet and de-novo synthesis. In ruminants the principal sources of carbon for fatty acid synthesis are acetic acid and b-hydroxybutyrate.

Alteration of milk fat concentration is achieved by changimore spreadable butter. Monounsaturated fatty acids in the diet have been shown to have beneficial effects on the plasma lipoprotein indicators of coronary heart disease risk. From a human nutrition point of view it could be beneficial to incorporate the long chain omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentanoic (EPA, C20:5) and docosahexanoic (C22:6) acids, into milk fat. The principal source of these fatty acids is fish oil but research to date indicates that their transfer into milk fat is inefficient. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a collective term describing one or more positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12 C18:2). CLA has been shown to have anticarcinogenic activity, antiatherogenic activity, an ability to reduce the catabolic effects of immune stimulation and an ability to enhance growth promotion and reduce body fat. It is present in ruminant milk and meat as a result of biohydrogenation in the rumen where it is an intermediate. Its concentration in bovine milk fat is influenced by dietary factors such as pasture feeding and supplementation with full fat oilseeds. Two other components of bovine milk fat which have been shown to have anticarcinogenic properties are butyric acid and sphingomyelin and their concentration warrants further study. It is likely that research will continue into means of manipulating both the content and composition of milk fat but ultimately the adoption of any of the strategies in practice is likely to depend on strong economic or consumer imperatives.ng either the level of de-novo synthesis in the mammary gland or the supply of long chain fatty acids in the diet. Dietary factors that affect the supply of acetic acid from the rumen for de-novo synthesis include fibre quantity and quality, forage to concentrate ratio, buffer inclusion, concentrate composition and concentrate feeding frequency. The effects of fat supplements on fat concentration are variable. In general, feeding rumen protected fat increases milk fat concentration whereas moderate amounts of unprotected unsaturated fat tend to decrease it.

Most nutritional manipulation has been directed at increasing the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids in milk fat in order to enhance its appeal to the consumer and to produce a softer fat. A more spreadable butter could be produced from such fat thus overcoming a major criticism of conventional butter.

If unsaturated fatty acids are fed to ruminants in an unprotected form rumen microbial digestion can be impaired and the unsaturated fatty acids are extensively saturated in the rumen. One strategy to overcome this is to include unsaturated fatty acids in a form protected from microbial digestion in the rumen. This resulted in the production of polyunsaturated milk fat from which a low melting point butter was produced. This product was predisposed to oxidative deterioration. More recently whole oilseeds have been fed to dairy cows. The unsaturated 18-carbon fatty acids in these seeds are hydrogenated in the rumen but the activity of a D-9 desaturase in the mammary gland and to a lesser extent the intestine converts the stearic acid (C18:0) to the monounsaturated fatty acid, oleic acid (C18:1). Milk fat rich in oleic acid is softer than conventional milk fat allowing the manufacture of a more spreadable butter. Monounsaturated fatty acids in the diet have been shown to have beneficial effects on the plasma lipoprotein indicators of coronary heart disease risk.

From a human nutrition point of view it could be beneficial to incorporate the long chain omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentanoic (EPA, C20:5) and docosahexanoic (C22:6) acids, into milk fat. The principal source of these fatty acids is fish oil but research to date indicates that their transfer into milk fat is inefficient. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a collective term describing one or more positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12 C18:2). CLA has been shown to have anticarcinogenic activity, antiatherogenic activity, an ability to reduce the catabolic effects of immune stimulation and an ability to enhance growth promotion and reduce body fat. It is present in ruminant milk and meat as a result of biohydrogenation in the rumen where it is an intermediate. Its concentration in bovine milk fat is influenced by dietary factors such as pasture feeding and supplementation with full fat oilseeds. Two other components of bovine milk fat which have been shown to have anticarcinogenic properties are butyric acid and sphingomyelin and their concentration warrants further study.

It is likely that research will continue into means of manipulating both the content and composition of milk fat but ultimately the adoption of any of the strategies in practice is likely to depend on strong economic or consumer imperative.

Type
Opportunities for nutritional manipulation of milk composition
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashes, J.R., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. 1997. Potential to alter the content and composition of milk fat through nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 22042212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashes, J.R., StVincent Welch, P., Gulati, S.K., Scott, T.W., Brown, G.H. and Blakeley, S. 1992. Manipulation of the fatty acid composition of milk by feeding protected canola seeds. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 10901096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Daley, S.R. and Sutton, J.D. 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of the composition of supplementary concentrates. Animal Production 59: 335344.Google Scholar
Banks, W., Clapperton, J.L. and Steele, W. 1983. Dietary manipulation of the content and fatty acid composition of milk fat. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42: 399406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, D.E. and Davis, C.L. 1974. Biosynthesis of milk fat. In Lactation – a comprehensive treatise 11 biosynthesis and secretion of milk/diseases, (ed Larson, B.L. and Smith, V.R.) pp. 31 75. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belury, M.A. 1995. Conjugated dienoic linoleate: a polyunsaturated fatty acid with unique chemoprotective properties. Nutrition Review 53: 8389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berner, L.A. 1993. Defining the role of milk fat in balanced diets. Advances in Food Nutrition Research 37: 131257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitman, J., Wrenn, T.R., Wood, D.L., Mustakes, G.C., Baker, E.C. and Wolf, W.J. 1975. Effects of feeding formaldehyde treated, full fat soyabean flours on milk fat polyunsaturated fatty acids. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 52: 415418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassidy, K.P., Murphy, J.J., O’Mara, F.P. and Rath, M. 1998. Effect of concentrate supplements differing in starch, sugar and fibre contents on cow performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 37: 134 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Cassidy, K., Murphy, J.J., O’Mara, F.P. and Rath, M. 1997. The effect of concentrate energy source on milk production and intake in mid-lactation dairy cows fed a grass-silage based diet. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 36: 129 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Castle, M.E., Gill, M.S. and Watson, J.N. 1981. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar beet pulp as silage supplements. Grass and Forage Science 36: 319324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, S.F., Storkson, K.J., Albright, K.J., Cook, M.E. and Pariza, M.W. 1994. Conjugated linoleic acid is a growth-factor for rats as shown by enhanced weight-gain and improved feed efficiency. Journal of Nutrition 124: 23442349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, W.W. 1995. Composition and structure of milk lipids. In Advanced dairy chemistry Volume 2, Lipids 2nd edition, (ed Fox, P.F.) pp. 136. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Christie, W.W. and Clapperton, J.L. 1982. Structures of cow's milk, fortified milks and human milk. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 35: 2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapperton, J.L. and Banks, W. 1985. Factors affecting the yield of milk and its constituents, particularly fatty acids, when dairy cows consume diets containing added fat. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 12051211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, L.J., Scott, T.W. and Pan, Y.S. 1972. Formaldehyde-treated casein-safflower oil supplement for dairy cows 11 Effect on the fatty acid composition of plasma and milk lipids. Journal of Dairy Research 39: 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullinane, N., Condon, D., Eason, D., Phelan, J.A. and Connolly, J.F. 1984. Influence of season and processing parameters on the physical properties of Irish butter. Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology 8: 1325.Google Scholar
Demeyer, D.I. and Henderickx, H.K. 1967. The effect of C18 unsaturated fatty acids on methane production in vitro by mixed rumen bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 137: 484497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewhurst, R.J., Aston, K., Fisher, W.J., Evans, R.T., Dhanoa, M.S. and McAllan, A.B. 1999. Comparison of energy and protein sources offered at low levels in grass–silage–based diets for dairy cows. Animal Science 68: 789799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiman, T.R., Anand, G.R., Satter, L.D. and Pariza, M.W. 1996. Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk from cows fed different diets. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 137 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Dhiman, T.R., Helmink, E.D., McMahon, D.J., Fife, R.L. and Pariza, M.W. 1999. Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk and cheese from cows fed extruded oilseeds. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 412419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhiman, T.R., Satter, L.D., Pariza, M.W., Galli, M.P. and Albright, K. 1997. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of milk from cows offered diets rich in linoleic and linolenic acid. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 184 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Dils, R.R. 1983. Milk fat synthesis. In Biochemistry of lactation, (ed Mepham, T.B.) pp. 141157. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Doreau, M. and Chilliard, Y. 1997. Effects of ruminal or post ruminal fish oil supplementation on intake and digestion in dairy cows. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 37: 113124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doreau, M. and Ferlay, A. 1994. Digestion and utilisation of fatty acids by ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45: 379396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S.A. and Poole, D.A. 1983. Effects of sodium bicarbonate in the diet of dairy cows. Animal Production 37: 183188.Google Scholar
Erdman, R.A. 1988. Dietary buffering requirements of the lactating dairy cow: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 32463266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German, J.B., Morand, L., Dillard, C.J. and Ruping, X. 1997. Milk fat composition: targets for alteration of function and nutrition. In Milk composition, production and biotechnology, (ed Welch, R.A.S., Burns, D.J.W., Davis, S.R., Popay, A.I. and Prosser, C.G.) pp. 3572. CAB International, New York.Google Scholar
Gibney, M.J. 1993. Animal products in a healthy diet. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, (ed Farrell, D.J.) pp. 145152. Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. 1984. The effects of frequency of feeding on milk production of dairy cattle: an analysis of published results. Animal Production 38: 181189.Google Scholar
Grummer, R.R. 1991. Effect of feed on the composition of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 32443257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunnet, I. and Knudsen, J. 1981. Direct transfer of fatty acids synthesised de-novo from fatty acid synthetase into triacylglycerols without activation. Biochimica et Biophysica Research Communications 100: 629636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, J.K. and Knudsen, J. 1980. Transacylation as a chain-termination mechanism in fatty acid synthesis by mammalian fatty acid synthetase. Synthesis of butyrate and hexanoate by lactating cow mammary gland fatty acid synthetase. Biochemical Journal 186: 287294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawke, J.C. and Taylor, M.W. 1995. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield, composition and physical properties of milk fat. In Advanced dairy chemistry Volume 2, Lipids 2nd edition, (ed Fox, P.F.) pp. 3788. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Herera-Saldana, R.E., Huber, J.T. and Poore, M.H. 1990. Dry matter, crude protein and starch degradability of five cereal grains. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 23862393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P., Jaakola, S. and Saarisalo, E. 1995. The effects of concentrate energy source on the milk production of dairy cows given a grass silage based diet. Animal Science 60: 3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1998. The world dairy situation 1998, Bulletin 333, 52 p.Google Scholar
Jensen, R.G. and Clarke, R.W. 1988. Lipid composition and properties. In Fundamentals of dairy chemistry, 3rd edition, (ed Wong, N.P., Jennes, R., Keeney, M. and Marth, E.H.) pp. 171213. Van Nostrand Rheinhold, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R.G., Ferris, A.M. and Lammi-Keefe, C.J. 1991. The composition of milk fat. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 32283243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, J., Bjoerck, L., Fonden, R. and Emanuelson, M. 1996. Occurrence of conjugated cis-9, trans-11-octadecadienoic acid in bovine milk: effects of feed and dietary regimen. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 438445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keady, T.W.J., Mayne, C.S. and Marsden, M. 1998. The effects of concentrate energy source on silage intake and animal performance with lactating dairy cows offered a range of grass silages. Animal Science 66: 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, T.W.J. and Mayne, C.S. 1998. An examination of the effects of level of fish oil inclusion in the diet on forage intake, milk yield and composition of lactating dairy cattle offered two levels of concentrates. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Scarborough page 37.Google Scholar
Keady, T.W.J., Mayne, C.S., Fitzpatrick, D.A. and Marsden, M. 1999. The effects of energy source and level of digestible undegradable protein in concentrates on silage intake and performance of lactating dairy cows offered a range of grass silages. Animal Science 68: 763777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M.L., Kolver, E.S., Bauman, D.E., Van Amburgh, M.E. and Muller, L.D. 1998. Effect of intake of pasture on concentrations of conjugated linoleic acid in milk of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 16301636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennelly, J.J. 1996. Producing milk with 2.5% fat - the biology and health implications for dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, J.E. 1970. Stearic acid metabolism by mammary cells. Journal of Dairy Science 53: 17571765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinsella, J.E. 1972. Stearyl CoA as a precursor of oleic acid and glycerolipids in mammary microsomes from lactating bovine: possible regulatory steps in milk triglyceride synthesis. Lipids 7: 349355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, J. 1972. Fatty acid synthetase from cow mammary tissue cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 280: 408414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawless, F., Murphy, J.J., Harrington, D., Devery, R. and Stanton, C. 1998. Elevation of conjugated cis-9, trans-11-octadecenoic acid in bovine milk because of dietary supplementation. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 32593267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K.N., Kritchevsky, D. and Pariza, M.W. 1994. Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 108: 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansbridge, R.J. and Blake, J.S. 1997. The effect of feeding fish oil on the fatty acid composition of bovine milk. Proceeding of the British Society of Animal Science, Scarborough page 22.Google Scholar
Mather, I.H. and Keenan., T.W. 1983. Function of endomembranes and the cell surface in the secretion of organic milk constituents. In Biochemistry of Lactation, (ed T.B. Mepham, ) pp. 231283. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Mattson, F.H. and Grundy, S.M. 1985. A comparison of effects of dietary saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in man. Journal of Lipid Research 26: 194202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayne, C.S. and Gordon, F.J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 6576.Google Scholar
McDonald, I.W. and Scott, T.W. 1977. Foods of ruminant origin with elevated content of polyunsaturated fatty acids. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 26: 144207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, J., Hojrup, P., Hansen, G.F. and Knudsen, J. 1985. Evidence that the mediumchain acyltransferase of lactating-goat mammary-gland fatty acid synthetase is identical with the acetyl/malonyltransferase. Biochemical Journal 227: 981985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, C.C., Park, Y., Pariza, M.W. and Cook, M.E. 1994. Feeding conjugated linoleic acid to animals partially overcomes catabolic responses due to endotoxin injection. Biochemical, Biophysical Research Communications 198: 11071112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, J.J. 1986. A note on the use of pressed sugar beet pulp in the diet of lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 561564.Google Scholar
Murphy, J.J., Connolly, J.F. and McNeill, G.P. 1995. Effects on cow performance and milk fat composition of feeding full fat soyabeans and rapeseeds to dairy cows at pasture. Livestock Production Science 44: 1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J.J., McNeill, G.P., Connolly, J.F. and Gleeson, P.A. 1990. Effect on cow performance and milk fat composition of including full fat soyabeans and rapeseeds in the concentrate mixture for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy research 57: 295306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council 1989. In Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Sixth revised edition, pp. 5556. National Academy Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Palmquist, D.L. 1993. Dietary factors affecting milk fat output. In Proceedings of the Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, (ed Thomas, O.P.) pp. 118128. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Palmquist, D.L. and Jenkins, T.C. 1980. Fat in lactation rations: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, D.L., Beaulieu, A.D. and Barbano, D.M. 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 17531771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pariza, M.W., Park, Y., Cook, M., Albright, K. and Liu, W. 1996. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduces body fat. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal 10: 3227 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Parodi, P.W. 1994. Conjugated linoleic acid: an anticarcinogenic fatty acid present in milk fat. Australian Journal of Dairy technology 49: 9397.Google Scholar
Parodi, P. W. 1999. Conjugated linoleic acid and other anticarcinogenic agents in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 13391349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanton, C., Lawless, F., Kjellmer, G., Harrington, D., Devery, R., Connolly, J.F. and Murphy, J. 1997a. Dietary influences on bovine milk cis-9, trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid content. Journal of Food Science 62: 10831086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, C., Lawless, F., Murphy, J.J. and Connolly, J.F. 1997b. Conjugated linoleic acid - a marketing advantage for animal fats. In Animal Fats : BSE and After, (ed Berger, K.) pp. 2741. P.J. Barnes and Associates, Bridgewater, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Sutton, J.D. 1989. Altering milk composition by feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 28012814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, L.D., Bines, J.A., Morant, S.V., Napper, D.J. and Givens, D.I. 1987. A comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for milk production, energy utilisation and hay intake by Friesian cows. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 109: 375386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tall, A.R. 1992. Metabolic and genetic control of HDL cholesterol levels. Journal of Internal Medicine 231: 661668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wonsil, B.J., Herbein, J.H. and Watkins, B.A. 1994. Dietary and ruminally derived trans-18:1 fatty acids alter bovine milk lipids. Journal of Nutrition 124: 556565.Google Scholar
Woodford, J.A., Jorgensen, N.A. and Barrington, G.P. 1986. Impact of dietary fibre and physical form on performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 10351047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrenn, T.R., Weyant, J.R., Wood, D.L., Bitman, J., Rawlings, R.M. and Lyon, K.E. 1976. Increasing polyunsaturation of milk fats by feeding formaldehyde protected sunflower-soyabean supplement. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 627635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed