Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:31:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency of MOET nucleus breeding schemes in selecting for traits with low heritability in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. Teepker  and
C. Smith
G. Teepker
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
C. Smith
Affiliation:
Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Theoretical rates of genetic response are calculated for adult multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) nucleus breeding schemes and conventional breeding systems in dairy cattle. For a single trait breeding objective, the relative responses with MOET schemes decline as the heritability falls and the number of progeny in the progeny test scheme increases. Selection for an aggregate breeding objective of milk yield and another trait, for different values of heritability, correlation and relative economic importance, is also examined. Generally, the overall response of efficient MOET schemes exceeds the progress of an efficient conventional breeding scheme with 50 to 100 daughters per bull. Only if the relative economic weight for the lowly heritable trait exceeds 0·60 and the progeny test is on 200 offspring are conventional systems superior. Testing additional paternal half-sib groups from a MOET scheme gives a considerable extra response, especially when lowly heritable traits have a dominating economic importance.

Keywords

dairy cattleembryo transferheritabilityselection
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 213 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fewson, D. 1989. Economic aspects of MOET breeding schemes. In New Selection Schemes in Cattle: Nucleus Programmes (ed. Kalm, E. and Liboriussen, T.). Publication, European Association for Animal Production, No. 44, pp. 143–160. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1976. Order statistics of correlated variables and implications in genetic selection programmes. Biometrics 32: 889–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juga, J. and Maki-Tanila, A. 1987. Genetic change in a nucleus breeding dairy herd using embryo transfer. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 37: 511–519.Google Scholar
Lucey, J. 1986. MOET in dairy cattle breeding programs. M.Sc. Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. and Smith, C. 1990. Comparison of theoretical and simulated equilibrium genetic response rates with progeny testing in dairy cattle. Animal Production 50: 207–212.Google Scholar
Nicholas, F. W. and Smith, C. 1983. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Animal Production 36: 341–353.Google Scholar
Ruane, J. and Thompson, R. 1989. Simulation of an adult MOET nucleus breeding scheme in dairy cattle. In New Selection Schemes in Cattle: Nucleus Programmes (ed. Kalm, E. and Liboriussen, T.). Publication, European Association for Animal Production, No. 44, pp. 72–80. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1983. Effects of changes in economic weights on the efficiency of index selection. Journal of Animal Science 56: 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1988. Checking rates of genetic response with new reproductive techniques. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding, Paris, Vol. 1, pp. 159–171. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Toro, M. A., Silió, L., Rodrigánez, J. and Dobao, M. T. 1988. Embryo transfer and genetic improvement of wool yield in sheep. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding, Paris, Vol. 1, pp. 214–216. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Smith, C. 1988. The value of indicator traits in the genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Animal Production 46: 333–345.Google Scholar