Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:50:44.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Simplified Approach to Free-Surface Wave Drag Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Peter R. Payne*
Affiliation:
Peter Ft. Payne Inc, Rockville, Md

Summary

The problem of a two-dimensional pressure field moving over a free surface is analysed by dynamic modelling techniques. Using a simple second order linear differential equation, it is possible to obtain all the classical theory rersults for a uniform field in deep water. Squire’s results for the non-uniform pressure field of a planing wedge are also duplicated. Further results, not hitherto obtained with classical theory, may explain some anomalies associated with the classical theory. The method has the advantage that results for a large number of “pressure field distributions” have already been tabulated by workers studying the response of simple lumped parameter mechanical dynamic systems.

A conclusion of some practical importance in applied hydrodynamics is that the wave drag of a pressure field varies with its distribution. The more non-uniform a pressure field the greater its wave drag. The theory also gives insight into the occurrence of “humps and hollows” in model resistance curves, and gives some insight as to why a minor change in form may cause a major change in wave resistance.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stoker, J. J. Water Waves. Interscience Publishers Inc, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
2. Lamb, sir H. Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. Dover Publications, New York, 1932.Google Scholar
3. Crewe, P. R. and Eggington, W. J. The Hovercraft—A New Concept in Maritime Transport. The Royal Institu tion of Naval Architects, 19th November 1959.Google Scholar
4. Newman, J. N. and Poole, F. A. P. Wave Resistance of a Moving Pressure Distribution in a Canal. DTMB Re port No. 1619, 1962.Google Scholar
5. Barratt, M. J. The Wave Drag of a Hovercraft. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 22, Part 1, 1965.Google Scholar
6. Jacobsen, L. S. and Ayre, R. S. Engineering Vibrations. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
7. Weinblum, G. P. Analysis of Wave Resistance. DTMB Report No. 740, 1950.Google Scholar
8. Squire, H. B. The Motion of a Simple Wedge Along the Water Surface. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Ser. A, Vol 243, 1957.Google Scholar
9. Murthy, T. K. S. The Wave Resistance of a Compart- mented Cushion. Hovering Craft and Hydrofoil, Vol 5, No. 11, August 1966.Google Scholar