Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:20:42.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenomena observed during aerofoil ramp-down motions from the fully separated state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. B. Green  and
R. A. McD. Galbraith
R. B. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Scotland
R. A. McD. Galbraith
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unsteady pressure data from seven aerofoil models performing constant pitch rate “ramp-down” motions from the fully separated state to low incidence have been analysed. It is observed that the time delay between attachment at the leading edge and the occurrence of minimum normal force is, to a first order, independent of reduced pitch rate. As a result, at sufficiently high pitch rate, negative normal force may be generated at large positive incidence. In contrast to this, the re-establishmeht of attached flow to the upper surface is strongly dependent upon pitch rate. The paper also contains a description of smoke flow visualisation tests. These were at a much lower Reynolds number than the pressure data tests, and consequently are of qualitative interest. Results of flow visualisation show that during a ramp-down test the near wake is much larger than in the corresponding static case, and that attachment is significantly delayed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 98 , Issue 979 , November 1994 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McCroskey, W.J., McAlister, K.W., Carr, L.W., Pucci, S.L., Lambert, O. and Indergrand, R.F. Dynamic stall on advanced air foil sections, J Am Helicopter Soc, 1981, 26, p 40.Google Scholar
2. Lorber, P.F. and Carta, F.O. Unsteady stall penetration experiments at high Reynolds number, AFOSR TR-97-1202, UTRC R87-956939-3, 1987.Google Scholar
3. Green, R.B., Galbraith, R.A.McD. and Niven, A.J. Measurements of the dynamic stall vortex convection speed, Aeronaut J, 1992, 96, (958), pp 319–327.Google Scholar
4. Leishman, J.G. and Beddoes, T.S. A generalised model for airfoil unsteady aerodynamic behaviour and dynamic stall using the indicial method, 42nd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, June 1986.Google Scholar
5. Galbraith, R.A.MCD., Gracey, M.W. and Leitch, E. Summary of Pressure Data for Thirteen Aerofoils on the University of Glasgow's Aerofoil Database, University of Glasgow, Dept Aero Eng, Rept No 9221, 1992.Google Scholar
6. Seto, L.Y. An Experimental Investigation of Low Speed Dynamic Stall and Reattachment of the NACA 23012 Under Constant Pitch Motion, PhD thesis, Dept Aero Eng, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, 1988.Google Scholar
7. Niven, A.J. Galbraith, R.A.McD. and Herring, D.G.F. Analysis of reattachment during ramp-down tests, Vertica, 1989, 13, p 187.Google Scholar
8. Niven, A.J. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Experiments on the establishment of fully attached aerofoil flow from the fully stalled condition during ramp-down motions, Proc 17th ICAS conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1990.Google Scholar
9. Ahmed, S. and Chandrasekhara, M.S. Reattachment studies of an oscillating airfoil dynamic stall flowfield, AIAA paper 91–3225, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Green, R.B. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. A demonstration of the effect of the testing environment on unsteady aerodynamics experiments, Aeronaut J, February 1994, 98, (982), pp 83–89.Google Scholar
11. Head, M.R. and Bandyopadhyay, P. New aspects of turbulent boundary layer structure, J Fluid Mech, 1981, 107, p 297.Google Scholar
12. Green, R.B. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. An investigation of dynamic stall through the application of leading edge roughness, Aeronaut 7, January 1994, 98, pp 17–25.Google Scholar