Element contents
Empirical Knowledge in the Eighteenth-Century Novel
Beyond Realism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2022
Summary
This Element examines the eighteenth-century novel's contributions to empirical knowledge. Realism has been the conventional framework for treating this subject within literary studies. This Element identifies the limitations of the realism framework for addressing the question of knowledge in the eighteenth-century novel. Moving beyond the familiar focus in the study of novelistic realism on problems of perception and representation, this Element focuses instead on how the eighteenth-century novel staged problems of inductive reasoning. It argues that we should understand the novel's contributions to empirical knowledge primarily in terms of what the novel offered as training ground for methods of reasoning, rather than what it offered in terms of formal innovations for representing knowledge. We learn from such a shift that the eighteenth-century novel was not a failed experiment in realism, or in representing things as they are, but a valuable system for reasoning and thought experiment.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108866378Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 17 November 2022
References
Arbuthnot, J. (1701). An Essay on the Usefulness of Mathematical Learning, Oxford: Printed at the Theatre in Oxford for Anth. Priestley.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1620). The Philosophical Works of Frances Bacon, Repr 1905, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bannet, E. T. (2007). Quixotes, Imitations, and Transatlantic Genres. Eighteenth-Century Studies 40(4), 553–569.Google Scholar
Batten, W. (1630). A Most Plaine and Easie Way for Finding the Sunne’s Amplitude and Azimuth, London.Google Scholar
Bender, J. (1998). Enlightenment Fiction and the Scientific Hypothesis. Representations 61(Winter), 6–28.Google Scholar
Bender, J. (2010). Novel Knowledge: Judgment, Experience, Experiment, in Siskin, C. and Warner, W. (eds.) This Is Enlightenment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 284–300.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. (1710). Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues, Repr 2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. (1661). Robert Boyle’s Air-Pump. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boyle_air_pump.jpg.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1990). How to Read Like a Gentleman: Burney’s Instructions to Her Critics in Evelina. English Literary History 57(3), 557–583.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. B. (1999). Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chico, T. (2018). The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crump, J. (2002). A Known Scribbler: Frances Burney on Literary Life, Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
Dale, A. (2019). The Printed Reader: Gender, Quixotism, and Textual Bodies in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
DeGabriele, P. (2014). The Legal Fiction and Epistolary Form: Frances Burney’s Evelina. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 14(2), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deringer, W. (2018). Calculated Values: Finance, Politics, and the Quantitative Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dicker, G. (2019). Locke on Knowledge and Reality: A Commentary on an Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, B. (2019). “Chequer Works of Providence”: Skeptical Providentialism in Daniel Defoe’s Fiction. Philosophy and Literature 43, 107–120.Google Scholar
Doody, M. A. (1997). The Short Fiction, in Copeland, E. and McMaster, J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–99.Google Scholar
Doré, G. (1863). Don Quijote and Sancho Panza. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Don_Quijote_and_Sancho_Panza.jpg.Google Scholar
Evelyn, J. (1667). Frontispiece to the History of the Royal Society of London. 1702 ed. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frontispiece_to_%27The_History_of_the_Royal-Society_of_London%27.jpg.Google Scholar
Fielding, H. (1752). Review of Charlotte Lennox’s The Female Quixote. The Covent Garden Journal 242, Repr 2011.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. (2006). The Rise of Fictionality, in Moretti, F. (ed.) The Novel, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 336–363.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. P. (2006). The Practice of Quixotism: Postmodern Theory and Eighteenth-Century Women’s Writing, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference, Repr 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, A. R. (2019). A World of Disorderly Notions: Quixote and the Logic of Exceptionalism, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming a). From Writing Lives to Scaling Lives in Joseph Priestley’s Chart of Biography. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 62(3–4).Google Scholar
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming b). Information and Credibility in Journal of the Plague Year. Digital Defoe.Google Scholar
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming c). Sense and Sensibility as Social-Epistemic System. Studies in the Novel 55(2).Google Scholar
Hastings, W. (1912). Errors and Inconsistencies in Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. English Language Notes 27(6), pp. 161–166.Google Scholar
Hershinow, S. (2019). Born Yesterday: Inexperience and the Early Realist Novel, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. (1665a). Micrographia, London: printed by Jo. Martyn and Ja. Allestry, printers to the Royal Society.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. (1665b). Stinging Nettle. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert_Hooke,_Micrographia,_stinging_nettle._Wellcome_L0013027.jpg.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature, Repr 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1757). Of the Standard of Taste, and Other Essays, Repr 1965, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Keiser, J. (2020). Nervous Fictions: Literary Form and the Enlightenment Origins of Neuroscience, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Kirkley, H. (2002). A Biographer at Work: Samuel Johnson’s Notes for the “Life of Pope”, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Kramnick, J. (2007). Empiricism, Cognitive Science, and the Novel. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 263–285.Google Scholar
Kramnick, J. (2010). Actions and Objects from Hobbes to Richardson, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, K. (2019). 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, C. (2020). Artifacts: How We Think and Write about Found Objects, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lamb, J. (2007). Locke’s Wild Fancies: Empiricism, Personhood, and Fictionality. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 187–204.Google Scholar
Loar, C. (2019). Plague’s Ecologies: Daniel Defoe and the Epidemic Constitution. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 32(1), 31–53.Google Scholar
Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupton, C. (2012). Knowing Books: The Consciousness of Mediation in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
MacDonnell, K. (2020). Beneath Defoe’s Island: Imperial Geopolitics and the Inorganic Economy in Robinson Crusoe. Philological Quarterly 99(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
McKeon, M. (2000). Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Molesworth, J. (2010). Chance and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Realism, Probability, Magic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Motooka, W. (1998). The Age of Reasons: Quixotism, Sentimentalism, and Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Britain, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. (2001). What Did Hume Really Show about Induction? The Philosophical Quarterly 51(204), 307–327.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, H. (1666). Philosophical Transactons Volume 1 Frontispiece. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Philosophical_Transactions_Volume_1_frontispiece.jpg.Google Scholar
Paulson, R. (1998). Don Quixote in England: The Aesthetics of Laughter, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1690). Political Arithmetick, London: Printed for Robert Clavel at the Peacock, and Hen. Mortlock at the Phoenix in St. Paul’s Church-yard.Google Scholar
Picciotto, J. (2010). Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pino, M. (2010). Burney’s Evelina and Aesthetics in Action. Modern Philology 108(2), 263–303.Google Scholar
Poovey, M. (1998). A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, D. (2018). Science, Form, and the Problem of Induction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, C. (2016). The Poetics of Scientific Investigation in Seventeenth-Century England, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Principe, L. M. (1995). Virtuous Romance and Romantic Virtuoso: The Shaping of Robert Boyle’s Literary Style. Journal of the History of Ideas 56(3), 377–397.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. (2008). Is Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Inconsistent? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(1), 83–104.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the Fact, in Gitelman, L. (ed.) Raw Data is an Oxymoron, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. (2020). We are Interested in What Happens When People Disagree. Accessed August 18, 2020. www.uab.cat/web?cid=1096481466574&pagename=UABDivulga%2FPage%2FTemplatePageDetallArticleInvestigar¶m1=1321342540533.Google Scholar
Schmidgen, W. (2001). Robinson Crusoe, Enumeration, and the Mercantile Fetish. Eighteenth-Century Studies 35(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
Schmidgen, W. (2016). The Metaphysics of Robinson Crusoe. English Literary History 83(1), 101–126.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1995). Cordelia’s Love: Credibility and the Social Study of Science. Perspectives on Science 3(3), 255–275.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (2011). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, revised ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. W. (2016). Empiricist Devotions: Science, Religion, and Poetry in Early Eighteenth-Century England, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Spacks, P. M. (1974). Ev’ry Woman is at Heart a Rake. Eighteenth-Century Studies 8(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
Spacks, P. M. (1988). The Subtle Sophistry of Desire: Dr. Johnson and The Female Quixote. Modern Philology 85, 532–542.Google Scholar
Spacks, P. M. (1990). Desire and Truth: Functions of Plot in Eighteenth-Century English Novels, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Straub, K. (1989). Reconstructing the Gaze: Voyeurism in Richardson’s Pamela. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18, 419–431.Google Scholar
Swenson, R. (2010). Optics, Gender, and the Eighteenth-Century Gaze: Looking at Eliza Haywood’s Anti-Pamela. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 51(1–2), 27–43.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. (2016). Fictional Matter: Empiricism, Corpuscles, and the Novel, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. and Meeker, N. (2007). Empiricism, Substance, Narrative: An Introduction. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 183–186.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (2002). “Words” and “Things” – or, “Words, Concepts, and Things”? Rhetorical and Linguistic Categories in the Renaissance, in Kessler, E. and Maclean, I. (eds.) Res et Verba in der Renaissance, Weissbaden: Harassowitz Verglag, pp. 287–335.Google Scholar
Wales, S. (1751). A Prospect of Vauxhall Gardens. Accessed August 5, 2022. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vauxhall_Gardens_by_Samuel_Wale_c1751.jpg.Google Scholar
Warner, W. (1998). Licensing Entertainment: The Elevation of Novel Reading in Britain, 1684–1750, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watt, I. (2001). The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding, 2nd ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2008). Shame and Necessity, 2nd ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wong, B. (2016). Pamela, Part II: Richardson’s Trial by Theatre. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 29(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2020). Robinson Crusoe and the Earthly Ground. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 32(3), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. (2005). Quixotic Fictions of the USA, 1792–1815, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wragge-Morley, A. (2020). Aesthetic Science: Representing Nature in the Royal Society of London, 1650–1720, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by