Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:07:07.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Plenoptic Cameras

from Part III - Systems and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Andreas Tünnermann
Affiliation:
Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
Sylvia Gebhardt
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems, Dresden, Germany
Henning Fouckhardt
Affiliation:
University of Kaiserslautern
Hans Zappe
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Claudia Duppé
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Plenoptic cameras are hybrid imaging systems combining a microlens array with a larger objective lens. In this chapter, we examine the optical limits of these systems and describe techniques to expand them. Before we do so, we start with providing an overview of the history, terminology and capabilities of plenoptic cameras.

History of Light Field Capturing

Plenoptic imaging was invented multiple times during the history of photography, each time changing its name and physical form. Initially, it was called integral photography. The first system was realised with photographic film by the Franco-Luxembourgian scientist and inventor Gabriel Lippmann at the Sorbonne (Lippmann 1908). An integral camera is equipped with multiple lenses arranged side by side in a square grid. Each lens creates a unique image on the film. Each image is slightly different from that of its neighbour. Like in stereoscopy, this difference is caused by the relative displacement of the lenses, an effect known as parallax.

In Lippmann's time, the production and alignment of the lenses was a manual and error-prone process. Imaging quality and light sensitivity were poor. Hence, Lippmann and his assistants could only build lab prototypes. Because no computing technology to process the images was available, the developed film was used as a projection slide, with another array of lenses as the imaging optics. Projection superimposed the individual images optically to form an integral image, which gives the process its name. Rather than being projected on a screen, the image is viewed directly. In the integral image, the observer could perceive depth in the recorded scene through stereoscopy and motion parallax. Throughout the twentieth century, Lippmann's idea was re-discovered every few decades (Ives 1930, Dudnikov 1970), advancing theory and manufacturing technology each time. The current renaissance started in the 1990s and was made possible by contributions from different fields of science and engineering, each with its unique terminology.

Now, light field is the commonly accepted term for the light quantities recorded from a scene. It is an abstraction of the electromagnetic field that describes both intensity and directional distribution of light for every three-dimensional (3D) point in space, but discards polarisation and phase. The term was popularised in computer graphics by Levoy & Hanrahan (1996). Light fields were first applied as a more robust starting point to the problem of view interpolation in image based rendering (Shum & Kang 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
Tunable Micro-optics , pp. 417 - 438
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelson, E. & Wang, J. (1992), ‘Single lens stereo with a plenoptic camera’, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 14(2), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, W. & Kreher, W. (2003), ‘Modelling piezoelectric modules with interdigitated electrode structures’, Computational Materials Science 26, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, B. (1993), ‘Électrocapillarité et mouillage de films isolants par l'eau’, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 317, Série II pp. 157–163.Google Scholar
Bramlage, B., Ernst, D. & Gebhardt, S. (2014), ‘Monolithic micro-positioning stage in piezo thick film technology’, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on New Actuators (ACTUATOR), pp. 381–384.Google Scholar
Bramlage, B. & Gebhardt, S. (2010), ‘Development of PZT thick film actuators for active micro-optics’, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on New Actuators (ACTUATOR), Bremen, pp. 594–596.Google Scholar
Brückner, A., Duparré, J., Leitel, R., Dannberg, P., Bräuer, A. & Tünnermann, A. (2010), ‘Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes’, Optics Express 18(24), 24379–24394.Google ScholarPubMed
Chai, J.-X., Tong, X., Chan, S.-C. & Shum, H.-Y. (2000), ‘Plenoptic sampling’, in Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp. 307–318.Google Scholar
Cossairt, O. (2011), Tradeoffs and Limits in Computational Imaging, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Dudnikov, Y. A. (1970), ‘Autostereoscopy and integral photography’, Optical Technology 7(37), 422–426.
Ernst, D., Bramlage, B. & Gebhardt, S. (2012), ‘In-plane polarized PZT thick film actuators by screen printing technology’, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on New Actuators (ACTUATOR), pp. 128–131.Google Scholar
Ernst, D., Bramlage, B., Gebhardt, S., Oberdörster, A., Pabst, O. & Wippermann, F. (2014), ‘Plenoptic camera with adaptable depth of field using PZT thick film actuators’, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on New Actuators (ACTUATOR), pp. 134–137.Google Scholar
Ernst, D., Bramlage, B., Gebhardt, S. & Schönecker, A. (2013), ‘High performance screen printed PZT thick film actuators by in-plane mode of excitation’, in Proceedings Electroceramics for End-users VII conference, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, S., Ernst, D., Bramlage, B., Flössel, M. & Schönecker, A. (2013), ‘Integrated piezoelectrics for smart microsystems – a teamwork of substrate and piezo’, in Advances in Science and Technology, Vol. 77-86, Trans Tech Publications, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Gortler, S. J., Grzeszczuk, R., Szeliski, R. & Cohen, M. F. (1996), ‘The lumigraph’, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
Harrison, H. (1949), ‘Fluid diaphragm’, US Patent (2,481,660).Google Scholar
Ives, H. E. (1930), ‘Parallax panoramagrams made with a large diameter lens’, Journal of the Optical Society of America 20(6), 332–340.Google Scholar
Kimmle, C., Schmittat, U., Döring, C. & Fouckhardt, H. (2011), ‘Compact dynamic microfluidiciris array’, in Proc. SPIE Optomechanics 2011: Innovations and Solutions, Vol. 8125, p. 81250Z (6pp).
Krogmann, F., Qu, H., Mönch, W. & Zappe, H. (2008), ‘Push/pull actuation using opto-electrowetting’, Sensors and Actuators A 141, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Moon, H., Fowler, J., Schoellhammer, T. & Kim, C. J. (2002), ‘Electrowetting and electrowetting-on-dielectrics for microscale liquid handling’, Sensors and Actuators A 95(9), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levoy, M. & Hanrahan, P. (1996), ‘Light field rendering’, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Lippmann, G. (1908), ‘Épreuves réversibles donnant la sensation du relief’, Journal de Physique 7(4), 821–825.Google Scholar
Lohmann, A. W. (1989), ‘Scaling laws for lens systems’, Applied Optics 28(23), 4996–4998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mugele, F., Klingner, A., Bührle, J., Steinhauser, D. & Herminghaus, S. (2005), ‘Electrowetting: a convenient way to switchable wettability patterns’, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17, S559–S576.Google Scholar
Müller, P., Kloss, A., Liebetraut, P., Mönch, W. & Zappe, H. (2011), ‘A fully integrated optofluidic attenuator’, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 21, 125027 (14pp), doi:10.1088/0960–1317/21/12/125027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, R. (2005), ‘Fourier slice photography’, in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 24, ACM, pp. 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, R., Levoy, M., Brédif, M., Duval, G., Horowitz, M. & Hanrahan, P. (2005), ‘Light field photography with a hand-held plenoptic camera’, Stanford Tech Report CTSR 2005-02.
Oberdörster, A. & Lensch, H. P. (2013), ‘Adaptive dof for plenoptic cameras’, in IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 86671R–86671R.
Perwaß, C. & Wietzke, L. (2012), ‘Single lens 3d-camera with extended depth-of-field’, in IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 829108–829108.
Quilliet, C. & Berge, B. (2001), ‘Electrowetting: a recent outbreak’, Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science 6, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöberl, M., Brückner, A., Foessel, S. & Kaup, A. (2012), ‘Photometric limits for digital camera systems’, Journal of Electronic Imaging 21(2), 020501–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shum, H. & Kang, S. B. (2000), ‘Review of image-based rendering techniques’, in Visual Communications and Image Processing 2000, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
Tanida, J., Kumagai, T., Yamada, K., Miyatake, S., Ishida, K., Morimoto, T., Kondou, N., Miyazaki, D. & Ichioka, Y. (2001), ‘Thin observation module by bound optics (tombo): Concept and experimental verification’, Applied Optics 40(11), 1806–1813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voelkel, R., Duparré, J., Wippermann, F., Dannberg, P., Bräuer, A., Zoberbier, R., Gabriel, M., Hornung, M., Hansen, S. & Süss, R. (2008), ‘Technology trends of microlens imprint lithography and wafer level cameras (WLC)’, in MOC '08, Conference on Micro-Optics, pp. 312–315.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Plenoptic Cameras
  • Edited by Hans Zappe, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Claudia Duppé, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Tunable Micro-optics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506052.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Plenoptic Cameras
  • Edited by Hans Zappe, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Claudia Duppé, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Tunable Micro-optics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506052.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Plenoptic Cameras
  • Edited by Hans Zappe, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Claudia Duppé, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Tunable Micro-optics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506052.017
Available formats
×