Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:25:56.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Climate Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bjørn Lomborg
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Considering Climate Engineering as a Response to Climate Change

Climate Change and Benefit-Cost Analysis

The task of this chapter is to answer a question that has been posed as part of the Copenhagen Consensus exploration of climate policy. That question is:

If the global community wants to spend up to, say, $250 billion per year over the next 10 years to diminish the adverse effects of climate changes, and to do most good for the world, which solutions would yield the greatest net benefits?

To address this question, we agreed to summarize the existing literature regarding the costs and benefits of geoengineering (GE), supplement these estimates where needed and feasible, and to provide benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) for at least two GE alternatives. Based on this analysis, the current chapter argues that some portion (0.3%) of the hypothetical $250 billion a year should be devoted to the task of researching and developing two GE areas: solar radiation management (SRM) and air capture (AC). As the reader will see, we argue that more emphasis should be placed on SRM but that AC merits some research support.

The reader should not interpret our focus on climate engineering (CE) as implying that other responses to climate change are unneeded. The proper mix and relative priority of various responses to climate change is in the purview of the expert panel, to which our chapter is one input.

Type
Chapter
Information
Smart Solutions to Climate Change
Comparing Costs and Benefits
, pp. 9 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbari, H., Menson, S., and Rosenfeld, A., 2009: Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2, Climatic Change 94(3–4), 275–86
Angel, R., 2006: Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(46), 17184–89
Arrow, K., 2007: Global climate change: a challenge to policy, The Economists' Voice 4(3), 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S., 2007a: Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S., 2007b: The incredible economics of geoengineering, Environmental and Resource Economics 39(1), 45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S., 2009: Geoengineering's role in climate change policy, Working Paper for the AEI Geoengineering Project
Bial, J.R., Houser, D., and Libecap, G.D., 2000: Public choice issues in international collective action: global warming regulation, Working Paper 00–05, Arizona University, Tucson, AZ
Borenstein, S., 2009: Obama looking at cooling air to fight warming, The Associated Press, April 9
Bower, K., Choularton, T., Latham, J., Sahraei, J., and Salter, S., 2006: Computational assessment of a proposed technique for global warming mitigation via albedo-enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds, Atmospheric Research 82(1–2), 328–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, J.M. and Wald, M.L., 2009: Big science role is seen in global warming cure, New York Times, February 12, A24
Caldeira, K. and Wood, L., 2008: Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 366(1882), 4039–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, L. and Caldeira, K., 2008: Atmospheric CO2 stabilization and ocean acidification, Geophysical Research Letters 35(19), L19609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, P. and Hambrey, M.J., 2006: Is the Greenland Ice Sheet in a state of collapse?, Geology Today 22(3), 98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L.R. and Noll, R.G., with Banks, J.S., Edelman, S.A., and Pegram, W.M., 1991: The Technology Pork Barrel, The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.N., 2000: International approaches to global climate change, World Bank Research Observer 15(2), 145–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corell, R.W., Hassol, S.J., and Melillo, J., 2008: Emerging challenges – methane from the Arctic: global warming wildcard, UNEP Year Book 2008: An Overview of Our Changing Environment, United Nations Environment Programme, Stevenage, UK
Crutzen, P.J., 2006: Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?, Climatic Change 77(3–4), 211–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W., 2006: The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good, Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, D., 2007: The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2009: Economics of Climate Change, National Center for Environmental Economics, July 21, http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/webpages/ClimateEconomics.html
Fleming, J.R., 2007: The climate engineers, The Wilson Quarterly 31(2), 46–60Google Scholar
Gaskill, A., 2004: Summary of meeting with US DOE to discuss geoengineering options to prevent abrupt and long-term climate change, www.global-warming-geo-engineering.org/DOE-Meeting/DOE-Geoengineering-Climate-Change-Meeting/org.html
Global Carbon Project, 2008: Carbon Budgets and Trends 2007, September 26
Goes, M., Keller, K., and Tuana, N., 2009: The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering, submitted to Climate Change
Govindasamy, B. and Caldeira, K., 2000: Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2 induced climate change, Geophysical Research Letters 27(14), 2141–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulledge, J., 2008: Three plausible scenarios of future climate change, in K.M. Campbell (ed.), Climatic Cataclysm: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Climate Change, Campbell, K.M., The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Hamwey, R.M., 2007: Active amplification of the terrestrial albedo to mitigate climate change: an exploratory study, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12(4), 419–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Z.-Z., Latif, M., Roeckner, E., and Bengtsson, L., 2000: Intensified Asian summer monsoon and its variability in a coupled model forced by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, Geophysical Research Letters 27(17), 2681–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Metz, B., Davidson, O., Bosch, P., Dave, R., and Meyer, L. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York
Jacoby, H.D., Babiker, M.H., Paltsev, S., and Reilly, J.M., 2008: Sharing the burden of GHG reductions, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 167
Keith, D.W. and Ha-Duong, M., 2003: CO2 capture from the air: technology assessment and implications for climate policy, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies – 6th International Conference: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: October 1–4, 2002, Kyoto, Japan, Pergamon, Oxford
Keith, D.W., Ha-Duong, M., and Stolaroff, J.K., 2006: Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air, Climatic Change 74(1–3), 17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R.A., 2007: Is battered Arctic sea ice down for the count?, Science 318(5847), 33–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiehl, J.T. and Trenberth, K.E., 1997: Earth's annual global mean energy budget, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78(2), 197–2082.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleypas, J.A., Feely, R.A., Fabry, V.J., Langdon, C., Sabine, C.L., and Robbins, L.L., 2006: Impacts of ocean acidification on coral reefs and other marine calcifiers: a guide for future research, Workshop report sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the US Geological Survey
Kravitz, B., Robock, A., Oman, L., Stenchikov, G., and Marquardt, A.B., 2009: Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres 114(D14109)
Kuylenstierna, J.C.I., Rodhe, H., Cinderby, S., and Hicks, K., 2001: Acidification in developing countries: ecosystem sensitivity and the critical load approach on a global scale, Ambio 30(1), 20–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lackner, K.S., Grimes, P., and Ziock, H.-J., 2001: Capturing carbon dioxide from air, Proceedings of the First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC
Lal, M., Cubasch, U., Voss, R., and Waszkewitz, J., 1995: Effect of transient Increase in Greenhouse Gases and sulphate aerosols on monsoon climate, Current Science 69(9), 752–63Google Scholar
Lane, L., Caldeira, K., Chatfield, R., and Langhoff, S., 2007: Workshop Report on Managing Solar Radiation, NASA Ames Research Center, Carnegie Institute of Washington Department of Global Ecology, NASA/CP-2007–214558
Lane, L. and Montgomery, D., 2008: Political institutions and greenhouse gas controls, AEI Center for Regulatory and Market Studies, Related Publication 08–09
Latham, J., 1990: Control of global warming?, Nature, 347, 339–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, J., Rasch, P.J., Chen, C.C., Kettles, L., Gadian, A., Gettleman, A., Morrison, H., Bower, K., and Choularton, T., 2008: Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds, Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A 366(1882), 3969–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenton, T.M. and Vaughan, N.E., 2009: The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 9, 2559–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCracken, M.C., 2006: Geoengineering: worthy of cautious evaluation?, Climatic Change 77(3–4), 235–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, H.D. and Caldeira, K., 2007: Transient climate – carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(24), 9949–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, W., 2002: Simulated changes of the Indian summer monsoon under enhanced greenhouse gas conditions in a global time-slice experiment, Geophysical Research Letters 29(7), 22.1–22.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J., 1994: The false promise of international institutions, International Security 19(3), 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, G.A. and Washington, W.M., 1993: South Asian summer monsoon variability in a model with doubled atmospheric Carbon Dioxide concentration, Science 260(5111), 1101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 1992: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
,National Research Council, 2005: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties, Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate, Climate Research Committe Board on Atmospheric Sciences and climate, Division on Earth and Life Studies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 1977: In search of useful theory of innovation, Research Policy 6(1), 36–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 1982: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., 1994: Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., 2002: Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy, Technological Change and the Environment, Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N., and Nordhaus, W.D. (eds), RFF Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., 2008: A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D., and Boyer, J., 2000: Warming the World: Economics Models of Global Warming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
North, D.C., 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C., 2005: Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C., Wallis, J.J., and Weingast, B.R., 2009: Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur, 1982: The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Pacala, S. and Socolow, R., 2004: Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science 305(5686), 968–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, J., Oldson, J., and Levin, E., 2006: Earth rings for planetary environment control, Acta Astronautica 58(1), 44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, R.A. Jr., 2009: An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy, Environmental Science & Policy 12(3), 216–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, P.J., Crutzen, P.J., and Coleman, D.B., 2008: Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: the role of particle size, Geophysical Research Letters 35(2), L02809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, P.J., Tilmes, S., Turco, R.P., Robock, A., Oman, L., Chen, C.-C., Stenchikov, G.L., and Garcia, R.R., 2008: An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A 366, 4007–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rau, G.H., Knauss, K.G., Langer, W.H., and Caldeira, K., 2007: Reducing energy-related CO2 emissions using accelerated weathering of limestone, Energy 32(8), 1471–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richels, R.G., Manne, A.S., and Wigley, T.M.L., 2004: Moving beyond concentrations: the challenge of limiting temperature change, AEI–Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper 04–11
Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J.S., Hetherington, A.M., and Valdes, P.J., 2009: Tackling regional climate change by leaf albedo bio-geoengineering, Current Biology 19(2), 146–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robock, A., 2008a: Whither geoengineering?, Science 320, 1166–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robock, A., 2008b: 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64(2), 14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, A. and Mao, J., 1995: The volcanic signal in surface temperature observations, Journal of Climate 8(5), 1086–11032.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, A., Marquardt, A.B., Kravitz, B., and Stenchikov, G., 2009: The benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters 36(L19703)
Robock, A., Oman, L., and Stenchikov, G., 2008: Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, D16101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Society, 2005: Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, Policy Document 12/05
Salter, S., Sortino, G., and Latham, J., 2008: Sea-going hardware for the cloud albedo method of reversing global warming, Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A 366(1882), 3989–4006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarewitz, D. and Nelson, R., 2008: Three rules for technological fixes, Nature 456, 871–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, T.C., 2002: What makes greenhouse sense?: time to rethink the Kyoto Protocol, Foreign Affairs 81(3), 2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeffington, R.A., 2006: Quantifying uncertainty in critical loads: (A) literature review, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 169(1–4), 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D.I., 2005: Global sulfur emissions from 1850 to 2000, Chemosphere 58(2), 163–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N., 2007: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stocker, Thomas F., 2003: Changes in the global carbon cycle and ocean circulation on the millennial time scale, Global Climate: Current Research and Uncertainties in the Climate System, Rodó, X. and Comín, F.A. (eds), Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Summers, L., 2007: Foreword, Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World, Aldy, J. and Stavins, R. (eds), Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Teller, E., Wood, L., and Hyde, R., 1997: Global warming and ice ages: I. Prospects for physics-based modulation of global change, University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Teller, E., Hyde, R., and Wood, L., 2002: Active climate stabilization: practical physics-based approaches to prevention of climate change, University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Teller, E., Hyde, R., Ishikawa, M., Nuckolls, J., and Wood, L., 2003: Active stabilization of climate: inexpensive, low-risk, near-term options for preventing global warming and ice ages via technologically varied solar radiative forcing, University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Tetlock, P.E. and Oppenheimer, M., 2008: The boundaries of the thinkable, Daedalus 137(2), 59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilmes, S., Müller, R., and Salawitch, R., 2008: The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes, Science 320(5880), 1201–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tol, R.S.J., 2006: The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: a comment, Energy & Environment 17(6), 977–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., 2008: The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers and catastrophes, Economics 2, 2008–25Google Scholar
Travis, W.R., 2009: Geo-engineering the climate: an emerging technology assessment, Discussion Paper prepared for the National Research Council, Committee on America's Climate Choices, http://americasclimatechoices.org/Geoengineering_Input/attachments/Travis_geoengineering.pdf
Trenberth, K.E., Fasullo, J.T., and Kiehl, J.T., 2009: Earth's global energy budget, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90(2), 311–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2008: UNFCCC: rising industrialized countries' emissions underscore urgent need for political action on climate change at Poznan meeting, Press Release, November 17
,United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2009: Changes in GHG emissions from 1990 to 2004 for Annex I Parties, July 21, http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/ghg_table_06.pdf
,United Nations Statistics Division, 2008: National Accounts, UN Statistics Division
,United States Department of Energy, 2002: Response options to limit rapid or severe climate change: assessment of research needs, National Climate Change Technology Initiative
,United States Energy Information Administration, 2006: International Energy Outlook, 2006, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2009: Economics of climate change, US EPA National Center for Environmental Economics
Victor, D.G., Morgan, M.G., Apt, J., Steinbruner, J., and Ricke, K., 2009: The geoengineering option: a last resort against global warming?, Foreign Affairs 88(2), 64–76Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 2007: A review of The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Journal of Economic Literature 45(3), 703–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L., 2009: On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change, Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T.M.L., 2006: A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization, Science 314(5798), 452–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wingenter, O.W., Elliot, S.M., and Blake, D.R., 2007: New directions: enhancing the natural sulfur cycle to slow global warming, Atmospheric Environment 41(34) 7373–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zickfeld, K., Knopf, B., Petoukhov, V., and Schellnhuber, H.J., 2005: Is the Indian summer monsoon stable against global change?, Geophysical Research Letters 32, L15707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, J.E. and Lane, L., 2009: An analysis of climate change as a response to global warming, Copenhagen Consensus Center, August 7
,COSEPUP [NRC] 1992. Policy implications of greenhouse warming: mitigation, adaptation, and the science base. National Academy of Science, Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP), National Academy Press. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Goes, M., Keller, K., and Tuana, N., 2009: The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering, submitted to Climatic Change
Graham-Rowe, D., 2007: Scientists attempt to roll back emissions, Guardian Unlimited, July 30, www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/jul/30/news.greentech
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2005: Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007a: Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007b: Summary for Policy Makers of Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007c: Working Group III – Mitigation, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, www.mnp.nl/ipcc/pages_media/AR4-chapters.html
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007d: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III – Chapter 3 Issues Related to Mitigation in the Long-term Context, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, www.mnp.nl/ipcc/pages_media/FAR4docs/chapters/Ch3_Longterm.pdf
,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007e: Summary for Policy Makers, Report of Working Group II – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, www.ipcc.ch/SPM040507.pdf
Keith, D.W., Ha-Duong, M., and Stolaroff, J.K., 2006: Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air, Climatic Change 74, 17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, D.J., Ridgwell, A., Valdes, P.J., and Seale, A., 2008: “Sunshade world”: a fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters 35(L12710).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey & Co., 2008: The carbon productivity challenge: curbing climate change and sustaining economic growth, June, www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/Carbon_Productivity/MGI_carbon_productivity_full_report.pdf
,National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 1992: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
,National Research Council (NRC), 2005: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties, Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Pielke, R. A.., 2009: “An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy,” Environmental Science & Policy 12, 216–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, A., 2008: 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64, 14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, A., Oman, L., and Stenchikov, G.L., 2008: Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 113(D16101).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarewitz, D. and Nelson, R., 2008: Three rules for technological fixes, Nature 456: 871–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N., 2007: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, www.hmtreasury.gov.uk./media/F/0/Chapter_9_Identifying_the_Costs_of_Mitigation.pdf; www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./media/B/7/Chapter_10_Macroeconomic_Models_of_Costs.pdf
Travis, W., 2009: Geo-engineering the climate: an emerging technology assessment, Discussion Paper prepared for the National Research Council, Committee on America's Climate Choices, americasclimatechoices.org/Geoengineering_Input/attachments/Travis_geoengineering.pdf
Trenberth, K.E. and Dai, A., 2007: Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters 34(L15702).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigley, T.M.L., 2006: A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization, Science 314, 452–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickel, J.E. and Lane, L., 2009: An analysis of climate change as a response to global warming, Copenhagen Consensus Center, August 7

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×