Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:37:37.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - An Update on “Does Culture Always Matter”: For Creativity, Yes, for Deductive Reasoning, No!

from SECTION THREE - CREATIVITY AND REASON: INTERACTIONS AND RELATED CONSTRUCTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

By
Weihua Niu ,
Sophia Braha  and
John X. Zhang
Edited by
James C. Kaufman  and
John Baer
Weihua Niu
Affiliation:
Pace University
Sophia Braha
Affiliation:
Pace University
John X. Zhang
Affiliation:
Fudan University
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

The work of Nisbett, Peng, Choi, and Norenzayan (2001) on culture and systems of thought has drawn much attention from psychologists. The authors presented a strong and provocative view of cultural influence on human cognition. According to Nisbett et al., culture can influence not only our belief systems, languages, and social cognitive systems, but also the very basic cognitive processes of how we perceive and think. Their paper reviewed studies showing how culture penetrated almost every aspect of our cognitive processing, such as focus of attention, cognitive control, knowledge acquisition, attribution, prediction and “post-diction” (ad hoc explanation), reasoning, cognitive styles, categorization, judgment, and problem solving.

Is the influence of culture on cognition as pervasive as Nisbett et al. suggested? In this chapter, we examine the extent of cultural influence on human thinking by focusing on two types of thinking: deductive reasoning and creativity, which are both fundamental human abilities but are commonly considered different cognitive processes.

To many psychologists, deductive reasoning and creativity are like two antitheses, representing two modes of thinking (e.g., de Bono, 1991; Johnson-Laird, 1987, 1993; Lavric, Forstmeier, & Rippon, 2000; Runco, 2002; Sternberg & O'Hara, 1999). Johnson-Laird (1987) once stated that the cognitive process of human creativity was beyond a scientific explanation, and certainly different from that of logical reasoning. De Bono (1991), who invented the terms vertical and lateral thinking, roughly paralleling the contrast between analytical and creative thinking, made clear distinctions between these two modes of thinking. According to de Bono, while vertical thinking proceeds along well-established patterns, follows a closed procedure, and promises a minimal result, lateral thinking seeks to avoid the obvious, has open-ended maximum solutions, and promises no single correct result.

Sternberg (1997a, 2012), in his successful intelligence theory, advocated that there were three aspects of intelligence: analytical, creative, and practical. Those three aspects can be independent from each other, such that a person strong in one aspect may not be necessarily strong in the other two.

As an important factor in individual differences, culture stands out as a crucial next step to be examined. A significant number of studies to date have explored cultural influence on deductive reasoning and creativity, but most focused on just one cognitive process. As critical as this topic is, the existing evidence is far from adequate. Therefore cultural influence on these two important modes of thinking deserves more attention.

Type
Chapter
Information
Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development , pp. 354 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansburg, P. I, & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality & Individual Differences. 34(7), 1141–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atchley, R. A., Keeney, M., & Burgess, C. (1999) Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms linking ambiguous word meaning retrieval and creativity. Brain and Cognition, 40, 479–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avitia, M. J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2014). Beyond g and c: The relationship of rated creativity to long-term storage and retrieval (Glr). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(3), 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, P. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity?Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekhtereva, N. P., Dan'ko, S. G., Starchenko, M. G., Pakhomov, S. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2001). Study of the brain organization of creativity: III Brain activation accessed by the local cerebral blood flow and EEG. Human Physiology, 27(4), 390–397.Google Scholar
Bickersteth, P., & Das, J. P. (1981). Syllogistic reasoning among school children from Canada and Sierra Leone. International Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. E., & Bogen, G. M. (1969). The other side of the brain. III. The corpus callosum and creativity. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 34. 191–220.Google Scholar
Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(4), 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, R. W., & Kennedy, D. (2005). Math and science achievement. Science, 307, 481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving of process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 2(4), 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I. (1989). Lateralization of defence mechanisms in a visual half-field paradigm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 330, 296–303.Google Scholar
Carlsson, I. (1990). Lateralization of defence mechanisms related to creative functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 31, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I., Wendt, J. R., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Difference in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 383–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., (2000). Cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(6), 890–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, A., & Koechlin, E. (2012). Reasoning, learning, and creativity: Frontal lobe function and human decision-making. PloS Biology, 10(3), e1001293, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2001). The influence of cultural styles of reasoning on attitudinal and cognitive responses to persuasive messages. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.
de Bono, E. (1991). Lateral and vertical thinking. In Henry, J. (Ed). Creative management (pp. 16–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
deSouza, L. C., Guimaraes, H. C., Teixeira, A. L, Caramelli, P., Levy, R., Dubois, B., & Volle, E. (2014). Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(761): 1–21.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Flanders, J. L., & Peterson, J. B. (2008). Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fangmeier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C. C., & Sloutsky, V. (2006). fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18(3), 320–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D. C, Hamson, C. O., Chen, G.Liu, F., Hoard, M. K, & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Computational and reasoning abilities in arithmetic: Cross-generational change in China and the United States. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 4(3), 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking through creativity and culture: Toward an integrated model. Piscataway, NJ, Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
Goel, V. (2007). Anatomy of deductive reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10). 435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortexin inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition, 93(3), B109–B121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., deSouza, L.C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(465), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity, American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Haberstroh, S.Oyserman, D.Schwarz, N., Kuehnen, U. & Ji, L. (2002). Is the interdependent-self more sensitive to question context than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, D., & Rucklidge, J. J. (2006). An investigat ion into the relationship among ADHD symptomatology, creativity and neuropsychological functioning in children. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 421–438.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(5), 253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaquish, G. A., & Ripple, R. E. (1984-1985). A life-span developmental cross-cultural study of divergent thinking abilities. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 20(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellen, H. U., & Urban, K. K. (1988). Assessing creative potential worldwide: The first cross-cultural application of the test for creative thinking – drawing production (TCT-DP). Gifted Education International, 6, 78–86.Google Scholar
Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Reasoning, imagining, and creating. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. 40, 121–129.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). Mental models, deductive reasoning, and the brain. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 999–1008). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N. (1985). Setting the record right: Comments on creativity and hemispheric functioning. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 3(1), 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ testing 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative?Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395–412). New York,: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., & Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(2), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam, K., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). The prepared mind neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17(10), 882–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavric, A., Forstmeier, S., & Rippon, G. (2000). Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks: An ERP study. Neuroreport. 11(8), 1613–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, N. L., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). Are there cross-cultural differences in reasoning. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 459–464).
Lopez, E. C., Esquivel, G. B, & Houtz, J. C. (1993). The creative skills of culturally and linguistically diverse gifted students. Creativity Research Journal, 6(4), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maltheis, F. E., Spooner, W. E., Coble, C. R., Takemura, S., Matsumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., & Yoshida, A. (1992). A study of the logical thinking skills and integrated process skills of junior high school students in North Carolina and Japan. Science Education. 76(2), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1977). Creativity, consciousness, and cortical arousal. Journal of Altered States of Arousal, 3(1), 69–87.Google Scholar
Martindale, C., Hines, D., Mitchell, L., & Covello, E. (1984). EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity. Personality & Individual Differences. 5(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2009). The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(30), 12554–12559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, A. H., MacDonald, H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1974). EEG alpha: Lateral asymmetry related to task, and hypnotizability. Psychophysiology. 11(3), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, A. K. (1996). Development of algebraic reasoning in children and adolescents: Cultural, curricular, and age-related effects. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67(6) 949–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niaz, M., & Saud de Nunez, G. (1991). The relationship of mobility-fixity to creativity formal reasoning and intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior. 25(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niu, W. (2007). Individual and environmental influences on Chinese student creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W. (2012). Confucian ideology and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creativity of Chinese and American cultures: A synthetic analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influence of artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W., Zhang, J., & Yang, Y. (2007). Deductive reasoning and creativity: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Report, 100: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noppe, L., & Gallagher, J. M. (1977). A cognitive style approach to creative thought. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(1), 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A. (1999). Rule-based and experience-based thinking: The cognitive consequences of intellectual traditions. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan.
Norenzayan, A., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E, Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pornrungroj, C. (1992). A comparison of creativity test scores between Thai children in a Thai culture and Thai-American children who were born and reared in an American culture. Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University.
Prado, J., Chadha, A., & Booth, J. R. (2011). The brain network for deductive reasoning: A quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3483–3497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudowicz, E., & Hui, A. (1997). The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12(1), 139–157.Google Scholar
Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30(4), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudowicz, E., & Yue, X. (2000). Concepts of creativity: similarities and differences among Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2002). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In Runco, M. (Ed.), Critical creative process (pp. 69–94). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, G., & Brown, G. (1990). Laterality and creativity concomitants of attention problems. Development Neuropsychology, 6(1). 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351.CrossRef
Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative Intelligence determine success in life. New York: Dutton Plume.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). Thinking styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The triarchic theory of successful intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues, 3rd ed. (pp. 156–177). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, P. E. (1982). Hemisphericity and creative functioning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15, 29–37.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. J., & Medin, D. L. (2005). Cultural differences in belief bias associated with deductive reasoning?. Cognitive science, 29(4), 525–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S., & Graves, R. E. (2002). Are creativity and schizotypy products of a right hemisphere bias? Brain and Cognition, 49, 138–151.CrossRef
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
White, A. H., & Shah, P. (2006). Uninhibited imaginations: creativity in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1121–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A. H., (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 673–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, R., & Niu, W. (2013). Cultural difference in stereotype perceptions and performances in non-verbal deductive reasoning and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Mental models and logical reasoning problems in GRE. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 7(4), 308–316.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Zeng, J., Guo, J.Ju, S., & Brinsjord, S. (2004). Empirical justification for the universalness of the mental logic and mental paradigm. Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 23992404.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×