Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:07:14.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Force and Determination

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Alan Gabbey
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

Physical force is as puzzling as Saint Augustine found time to be. We know what force is if no one asks us, but if we want to explain it to someone, we don't know. We know force as a bodily sensation, and we believe it is implicated in efficient causation; we have ways of measuring it, but we cannot explain its essence. That alone would account for the absence of a systematic metaphysics of force in Descartes’ writings, which in turn would account for it being the most intractable problem posed by his physics. He never defines force per se, yet he has a concept of extension and of motion and therefore a conception of physical force expressible as a mathematical quantity. Forces are measurable in terms of the same independent variables, which enables Descartes to compare forces of the same category. For the ontological ground of forces he appeals to God's continuous creative and conserving activity in the physical world (see concurrence versus conservation, divine). It is no surprise that complete agreement among Descartes scholars on the topic of force is in short supply.

Descartes categorizes force in two ways. First, in statics or traditional mechanics, the key notion is the force or effort required to raise a body against gravity, either vertically or along lines inclined to the vertical. The measure of such a force is the product of the body's weight and the vertical distance through which it is raised. It follows that the same force will raise bodies through vertical distances inversely proportional to their weights, a rule that in various forms goes back to antiquity. Descartes’ statement of this rule may be called his “General Statical Principle” (GSP) (Gabbey 1993; Slowik 2002, 113–17).

The second category of force applies in domains outside traditional mechanics: collisions between bodies, stones in slings, rigid-body rotation, planetary motion, ballistic phenomena, and free fall under gravity. By the first law of nature, a body in motion has a force to remain in motion; at rest it has a force to remain at rest (see inertia). The quantity of motion, given by the speed times the body's volume or corporeal quantity, measures the motive force. The body's “rest force,” peculiar to Descartes, is the force with which a body at rest resists any action that would dislodge it from its state of rest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Des Chene, Dennis. 2000. “On Laws and Ends: A Response to Hattab and Menn,” Perspectives on Science 8: 144–63.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. 1996. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1993. “Descartes's Physics and Descartes's Mechanics: Chicken and Egg?,” in Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes, ed. Voss, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 310–23.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan. 1980. “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton,” in Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, S.. Brighton: Harvester Press, 230–320.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1980. “The Metaphysics and Physics of Force in Descartes,” in Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, S.. Brighton: Harvester Press, 196–229.Google Scholar
Hattab, Helen. 2000. “The Problem of Secondary Causation in Descartes: A Response to Des Chene,” Perspectives on Science 8: 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchak, John. 2009. “On Force in Cartesian Physics,” Philosophy of Science, 76: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2000. “Force, Determination and Impact,” in Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, ed. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., and Sutton, J.. London: Routledge, 81–112.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. 1967. Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton.London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2008. Descartes on Causation.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schuster, John A. 2000. “Descartes Opticien: The Construction of the Laws of Refraction and the Manufacture of Its Physical Rationales, 1618–29,” in Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, ed. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., and Sutton, J.. London: Routledge, 258–312.Google Scholar
Slowik, Edward. 2002. Cartesian Spacetime. Descartes's Physics and the Relational Theory of Space and Motion, International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol. 181. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard. 1971. Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century, appendix B. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Force and Determination
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.108
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Force and Determination
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.108
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Force and Determination
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.108
Available formats
×