Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T18:45:32.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Daniel Bodansky
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Over the past couple of decades, there has been an explosion of interest, both among international lawyers and international relations scholars, in the legitimacy of international institutions (IOs) – what Ian Clark (2005: 12) has described as a “veritable renaissance of international legitimacy talk.” Studies have:

  • historically traced the changing conceptions of legitimacy in “international society” and “world society” (Clark 2005, 2007);

  • theorized about the concept of legitimacy (Simmons 1999; Applbaum 2010; Buchanan 2010; Tasioulas 2010);

  • advanced general normative conceptions of legitimacy (Buchanan 2003; Buchanan and Keohane 2006; Caney 2009);

  • surveyed the legitimacy of different types of international institutions, including global governance organizations (Koppell 2010), international financial institutions (Porter 2001; Woods 2003, 2006); private governance systems (Cashore 2002; Bernstein and Cashore 2007; Schaller 2007); and public–private partnerships (Bäckstrand 2006); and

  • examined the legitimacy of particular international institutions, including, among others, the World Trade Organization (WTO) (Howse 2000, 2001; Weiler 2000; Howse and Nicolaidis 2001; Esty 2002; Cass 2005; Picciotto 2005; Conti 2010), the International Criminal Court (Danner 2003), the Security Council (Caron 1993; Sato 2001; Jodoin 2005; Voeten 2005; Hurd 2008), the treaty bodies of multilateral environmental agreements (Brunnée 2002), investor–state arbitral tribunals (Brower 2003; Franck 2005), the Global Reporting Initiative (Beisheim and Dingwerth 2008), the World Commission on Dams (Dingwerth 2005), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (Clapp 1998; Raines 2003).

This recent burgeoning of interest in legitimacy represents a significant shift. Historically, neither international law (IL) nor international relations (IR) had paid much attention to the issue. International lawyers tended to focus on legality rather than legitimacy. And political scientists tended to focus on power and interests, rather than on normative factors such as legitimacy. The newfound concern about legitimacy reflects the growing interest by international lawyers in interdisciplinary studies and the greater openness of political scientists to constructivist perspectives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 321 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applbaum, Arthur Isak (2010). “Legitimacy without the Duty to Obey,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 215–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karin (2006). “Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness,” European Environment, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David (1991). The Legitimation of Power (Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beishem, Marianne, and Dingwerth, Klaus (2008). “Procedural Legitimacy and Private Transnational Governance,” SFB-Governance Working Paper Series No. 14.
Bernstein, Steven (2005). “Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance,” Journal of International Law and International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 139–66.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven (2010). “When Is Non-state Global Governance Really Governance?,” Utah Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin (2007). “Can Non-state Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework,” Regulation & Governance, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Julia (2008). “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes,” Regulation & Governance, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (1999). “The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 596–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (2007). “Legitimacy,” in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta, and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 704–23.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (2008). “The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
Breitmeier, Helmut (2008). The Legitimacy of International Regimes (Surrey, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H., II (2003). “Structure, Legitimacy and NAFTA's Investment Chapter,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 37–94.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta (2002). “COPing with Consent: Lawmaking under Multilateral Environmental Agreements,” Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2010). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2003). Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2010). “The Legitimacy of International Law,” in Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samantha (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O. (2006). “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,” Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 405–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, Simon (2009). “The Responsibilities and Legitimacy of Economic International Institutions,” in Meyer, Lukas (ed.), Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 92–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, David D. (1993). “The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 552–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin (2002). “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-state Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority,” Governance, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Deborah Z. (2005). The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy and Community in the International Trading System (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Jennifer (1998). “The Privatization of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World,” Global Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 295–316.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2005). Legitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (2007). International Legitimacy and World Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Claude, Inis (1966). “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coicaud, Jean-Marc, and Heiskanen, Veijo (eds.) (2001). The Legitimacy of International Organizations (Tokyo: UN University Press).Google Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. (2010). “Producing Legitimacy at the World Trade Organization: The Role of Expertise and Legal Capacity,” Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1999). “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View,” in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano (eds.), Democracy's Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston (2003). “Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 510–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus (2005). “The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Commission on Dams?” Global Governance, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Trachtman, Joel P. (2009). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. (2002). “The World Trade Organization's Legitimacy Crisis,” World Trade Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. (2006). “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 115, No. 7, pp. 1490–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Susan D. (2005). “The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions,” Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 1521–1625.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. (1990). The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. (1964). The Morality of Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1995). “The Legitimacy of Transnational Institutions: Compliance, Support and the European Court of Justice,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L (2003). “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A. (1998). “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta (2005). “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with Survey-Based Experiment,” Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth W., and Keohane, Robert O. (2005). “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, Scott (2003). “Legitimacy, Democracy, and Razian Authority,” Legal Theory, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlavac, Monica (2008). “A Developmental Approach to the Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,” in Reidy, David A. and Riker, Walter J. (eds.), Coercion and the State (New York: Springer), pp. 203–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert (2000). “Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H. (ed.), The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert (2001). “The Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization,” in Coicaud, Jean-Marc and Heiskanen, Veijo (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Organizations (New York: UN University Press), pp. 355–407.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (2001). “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far,” in Porter, Roger B., Sauve, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind, and Zampetti, Americo Beviglia (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 227–52.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian (1999). “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian (2008). “Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform,” Global Governance, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 199–217.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2005). “Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can the Circle Be Squared?” Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, Supp. S1, pp. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodoin, Sébastien (2005). “Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of the U.N. Security Council: A Normative and Empirical Assessment,” Sri Lanka Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan, and Braman, Donald (2006). “Cultural Cognition and Public Policy,” Yale Law and Policy Review, Vol. 24, pp. 147–70.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B. (2005). “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 68, No. 3–4, pp. 15–61.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir (2009). The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppell, Jonathan G. S. (2010). World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy, and the Design of Global Governance (Chicago: University Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias (2004). “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 907–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, Peter L. (2010). Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Lukas H. (2009). Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2004). “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 336–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, Sol (2005). “The WTO's Appellate Body: Legal Formalism as a Legitimation of Global Governance,” Governance, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Tony (2001). “The Democratic Deficit in the Institutional Arrangements for Regulating Global Finance,” Global Governance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 427–39.Google Scholar
Raines, Susan Summers (2003). “Perceptions of Legitimacy and Efficacy in International Environmental Management Standards: The Impact of the Participation Gap,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1986). The Morality of Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2007). “International Crises of Legitimacy,” International Politics, Vol. 44, No. 2–3, pp. 157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2006). “Transnational Governance and Legitimacy” in Benz, Arthur and Papadopoulos, Yannis (eds.), Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences (London: Routledge), pp. 179–99.Google Scholar
Sato, Tetsuo (2001). “The Legitimacy of Security Council Activities under Chapter VII of the UN Charter at the End of the Cold War,” in Coicaud, Jean-Marc and Heiskanen, Veijo (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Organizations (Tokyo: UN University Press), pp. 309–54.Google Scholar
Schaller, Susanne (2007). “The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Governance: An Analysis of the Ethical Trading Initiative,” INEF Report 91/2007.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1997). “Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare State,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, John A. (1999). “Justification and Legitimacy,” Ethics, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 739–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffek, Jens (2003). “The Legitimization of International Governance: A Discourse Approach,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. (1995). “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John (2010). “The Legitimacy of International Law,” in Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samantha (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 97–118.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006). “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voeten, Erik (2005). “The Political Origins of the UN Security Council's Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 527–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen (1992). “Measuring Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2001). “The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Porter, Roger, et al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press), pp. 334–50.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2004). “The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy,” ZaöRV, Vol. 64, pp. 547–62.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, and Röben, Volker (2008) (eds.). Legitimacy in International Law (Berlin: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Ngaire (1999). “Good Governance in International Organizations,” Global Governance, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire (2003). “Holding Intergovernmental Institutions to Account,” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Ngaire (2006). The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and Their Borrowers (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael (2004). “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems,” Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 260–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×